-------------------------------------------------------------------

DAWN WIRE SERVICE

------------------------------------------------------------------- Week Ending : 12 April 1997 Issue : 03/15 -------------------------------------------------------------------

Contents | National News | Business & Economy | Editorials & Features | Sports

The DAWN Wire Service (DWS) is a free weekly news-service from Pakistan's largest English language newspaper, the daily DAWN. DWS offers news, analysis and features of particular interest to the Pakistani Community on the Internet. Extracts from DWS can be used provided that this entire header is included at the beginning of each extract. We encourage comments & suggestions. We can be reached at: e-mail dws@dawn.khi.erum.com.pk dws%dawn%khi@sdnpk.undp.org fax +'(21) 568-3188 & 568-3801 mail Pakistan Herald Publications (Pvt.) Limited DAWN Group of Newspapers Haroon House, Karachi 74400, Pakistan TO START RECEIVING DWS FREE EVERY WEEK, JUST SEND US YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS! (c) Pakistan Herald Publications (Pvt.) Ltd., Pakistan - 1996 ******************************************************************** *****DAWN - the Internet Edition ** DAWN - the Internet Edition***** ******************************************************************** Read DAWN - the Internet Edition on the WWW ! http://xiber.com/dawn Pakistan's largest English language newspaper, DAWN, is now Pakistan's first newspaper on the WWW. DAWN - the Internet Edition will be published daily (except on Fridays and public holidays in Pakistan) and would be available on the Web by noon GMT. Check us out ! DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS

CONTENTS

===================================================================

NATIONAL NEWS

Pakistan & Indian PMs to meet in May President says he supported repeal of 8th Amendment No secret deal with govt, says Benazir Benazir rules out rapprochement with Leghari Major reshuffle in PPP hierarchy Punjab, Sindh rift may delay census 2m tons of wheat being imported Bill to suppress sectarianism soon, says PM ---------------------------------

BUSINESS & ECONOMY

Excessive borrowing stymies monetary stability Fiscal package: 'management by hope' Raising our stature in international trade Three-dimensional power crisis looms on horizon A spectacular act of faith Consultation on Islamic banking IMF keen to know cost of economic reforms Working group to simplify IT Ordinance KSE 100-share index suffers fresh fall of 6.31 points ---------------------------------------

EDITORIALS & FEATURES

Consistent honesty? Ardeshir Cowasjee Let 8th Amendment go as a whole Senator Iqbal Haider Destiny of the subcontinent Mazdak -----------

SPORTS

Nottinghamshire sign Pakistan pacer Zahid Betting & bribery charges damaging Sports conference; will it benefit the country? Jansher bags British Open title for 6th time in a row

=================================================================== 
DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 
=================================================================== 

NATIONAL NEWS

970408 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pakistan & Indian PMs to meet in May ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bureau Report ISLAMABAD, April 7: The prime ministers of Pakistan and India will meet in Maldives in May during the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation summit, Foreign Secretary Shamshad Ahmad told reporters. Talking informally with reporters at an international conference on human development in South Asia, the foreign secretary said prime ministers of the two countries would certainly meet in Maldives next month. He said the two heads of the government would discuss all outstanding issues between India and Pakistan, including Kashmir. Shamshad Ahmad said it was normal for the regional leaders to hold bilateral meetings on the sidelines of such a summit. "We have to go a long way," he said referring to the efforts being made by the two countries to resolve their disputes through negotiations. "The issues involved are complex and deep-rooted, he said but added it was gratifying that the two countries had agreed to continue talks." Foreign ministry sources confirmed that Foreign Minister Gohar Ayub Khan, who left for New Delhi, would hold talks with his Indian counterpart Inder Kumar Gujral before his return to Pakistan on April 9. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970408 ------------------------------------------------------------------- President says he supported repeal of 8th Amendment ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nasir Malick ISLAMABAD, April 7: President Farooq Leghari said he avidly supported the scrapping of the controversial parts of the 8th Amendment which gave the president the power to dissolve the assembly and added that he had invoked Article 58(2)(b) in the national interest and with a heavy heart. Talking to reporters after inaugurating the human development conference he said he did not understand why people thought he would be upset with the scrapping of the 8th Amendment which stripped him of the powers to dissolve the National Assembly. He said he never expressed anger at the scrapping of the parts of the 8th Amendment. This was the first public reaction of the president on the 13th Amendment passed by the parliament which vested in the prime minister the powers to appoint governors and armed forces chiefs previously held by the president. Newspapers had quoted PML leader Abdul Majid Malik as having said that the president was upset when informed by the prime minister that the government was scrapping the 8th Amendment. However, later Abdul Majeed Malik denied having made such remarks. The president said strange things were being said about him. He said with the repeal of the controversial portions of the 8th Amendment, democracy had been strengthened in Pakistan. Asked whether by removing the presidential powers, a way had been opened for the intervention of third force, the president said that from his past experience, he could easily say that the people were the biggest defenders of the constitution and democracy and hoped there would never be any such crisis in future which would warrant extra-constitutional action. Farooq Leghari said that during his entire political career, he had struggled for the supremacy of the constitution and even went to the jail for this cause. He recalled that soon after being elected as president, he had asked the parliament members to undo the amendment which was hanging as a sword of Damocles over their heads. But, he said, the then PPP government did not enjoy the two-thirds majority to pass the constitutional amendment. The president said when the situation in the country started deteriorating, he twice warned the PPP government that he would exercise his power under the 8th Amendment if the country's situation did not improve. He said he had warned the government at least six or seven months before dissolving the National Assembly. "So when the conditions deteriorated, the economy was on the verge of collapse and constitutional violations became rampant, I did what was possible only through the Eighth Amendment," he said. "I invoked Article 58(2)(b) with a heavy heart but in the interest of the country as it had become inevitable." The president said that after sacking the PPP government, he immediately announced the election date as per the constitutional requirement. "After this action, staying within the constitution, I held elections which were fair and free," he said. "As a result of the elections, a party came into power with two-thirds majority and they had the power to scrap the 8th Amendment. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970409 ------------------------------------------------------------------- No secret deal with govt, says Benazir ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, April 8: PPP chairperson Benazir Bhutto, who left for London, denied she had entered into any "secret deal" with the government. " I am not running away, I am not going under any secret deal with the government and I have never compromised on principles, whether it was during Gen Zia's rule or now," she said while talking to newsmen before her departure, apparently to meet her sister Sanam Bhutto. Ms Bhutto was bitter about press reports in this regard and said they were part of a character-assassination campaign launched against her and the family by those opposed to her "politics of the downtrodden." "I wish there were laws to punish those involved in publishing baseless and scandalous stories," Ms Bhutto said, opposing media trial of anyone in the country. "I wish parliament or the press itself framed laws through which elements who published baseless stories about a sell-out on Gwadar or Chakwal, sale of Bilawal House or containers and other stories," she said. Ms Bhutto said there were laws to punish corrupt politicians, generals and judges "but how many are punished?" She was of the view that laws were only for the poor and political opponents. . Ms Bhutto said that, despite the "media trial", claims about the Surrey mansion and other allegations could not be proved. She replied in the negative when asked if she was going to London in connection with admission of her children , and said they were studying in the country. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970406 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Benazir rules out rapprochement with Leghari ------------------------------------------------------------------- Our Correspondent LARKANA, April 5: Benazir Bhutto, chairperson of the PPP, has ruled out any compromise with President Leghari even if he steps down. Addressing a Press conference at Naudero on Saturday, the former prime minister said that she would not consider a rapprochement until the assassins of her brother Mir Murtaza Bhutto were exposed. She claimed that her sister-in-law, Ghinwa Bhutto, was brainwashed by the president and that the latter was pitted against her after being granted citizenship. Questioning Mr Leghari's sincerity with the party, Ms Bhutto said he should have tendered his resignation as president on Nov 4, when the PPP government was dismissed. Asked about chances of her reconciliation with the widow of Mir Murtaza, Benazir Bhutto said: "We have been keeping silence while every move came from the other side. The dispute within this family has been created by those who do not want to see PPP in power. Murder of my brother was also part of the conspiracy hatched by such people." Regarding policy and achievements of the PPP, she said: "We strongly believe in a stable and strong Pakistan, stood for the just cause of Muslim Ummah and raised voice for the Third World. Perhaps we could not convey our achievements to the media properly." DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970406 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Major reshuffle in PPP hierarchy ------------------------------------------------------------------- Our Reporter KARACHI, April 5: The PPP on Saturday announced a reorganised party structure in which Begum Nusrat Bhutto was officially named Rehbar chairperson of the party, while former prime minister Benazir Bhutto remains party chairperson. According to details faxed from Bilawal House, former commerce minister Chaudhry Ahmed Mukhtar was made party secretary general, a post for which former law minister Senator Chaudhry Aitzaz Ahsan had been tipped. In the fax message, which gave details of all the new posts, the reorganised PPP did not include the names of Jehangir Badar, Mushtaq Awan, N.D. Khan, Iqbal Haider, Naseerullah Khan Babar, Senator Ali Nawaz Shah, and Dr Ashraf Abbasi. The restructuring follows the crushing defeat of the party in the February 3 elections. Former NWFP chief minister and PPP chief of that province, Aftab Ahmed Khan Sherpao was elevated to the post of senior vice chairperson of the party. Makhdoom Amin Fahim, originally expected to be made Sindh PPP president, and Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani, former speaker of the National Assembly were both made vice presidents of the party. Makhdoom Shah Mohammad Qureshi and Senator Raza Rabbani were made deputy secretaries general. The post of information secretary, until now held by Senator Iqbal Haider, had been left vacant, but Barrister Iftekhar Ahmed was named deputy information secretary. Senator Ehsan Paracha was named treasurer and Pervaiz Khatak named the coordination secretary. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970410 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Punjab, Sindh rift may delay census ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bureau Report ISLAMABAD, April 9: After a first round of talks with two major provinces - Punjab and Sindh- the authorities are not sure about the holding of census this year, as decided earlier by the federal cabinet, it is learnt. Sources in the Population Census Organisation confided to Dawn that the fears of Punjab that Sindh may record inflated figures of its population, are still there, making it difficult for the authorities to get the two reach an agreement. "We believe that the census issue has been politicised badly. It requires a political solution, for which only the prime minister will have to take a decision after consulting Punjab and Sindh," a source said. They said the politicisation of the issue had complicated the situation. Punjab had fears that its population percentage would drop tremendously if the head count was not done properly in Sindh, which would consequently reduce its share in the divisible pool, besides reducing National Assembly seats and quota in jobs, they added. The sources said Punjab had proposed to conduct census on the basis of registration done by the passport and registration department. But the record of the registration department had shown a rise of hardly 0.9 per cent from 1981 to 1996, they said. The authorities did not approve Punjab's previous demand for freezing the existing share of provinces in the divisible pool by amending the Constitution. The authorities said it would not be acceptable to other provinces, particularly Sindh which believed that its population had increased since 1981 when the last census was conducted, the sources added. They said there was also a division in Sindh on the basis of urban and rural populations , and added that the urban population in Sindh was of the view that their percentage had increased tremendously. Because of this, the rural population in Sindh had its own fears. Balochistan, the sources said, was also divided on ethnic basis. Balochs believed that the Pakhtoon population, because of Afghan refugees, would undermine their domination in the province. About the NWFP , the sources said, it had no reservations except the demand that its overseas population also be counted while conducting census. "In view of these problems we believe that the census can only be held if the provinces show their commitment," a senior source in the census organisation commented. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970410 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2m tons of wheat being imported ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bureau Report ISLAMABAD, April 9: The Economic Coordination Committee of the cabinet, decided to import 2 million tons of wheat and 50,000 tons of sugar to pre- empt any future crisis. The ECC meeting, chaired by Finance Minister Sartaj Aziz, reviewed wheat and sugar stocks in the country and asked the ministry of agriculture to float international tenders for the import of wheat and sugar. The 2 million tons of wheat which will be in addition to the 320,000 tons of wheat being imported from the US, will be meant for the next year as the present estimates show that total production this year will remain slightly less than the country's total consumption of 17 million tons. However, the ECC noted that import of sugar was urgently required as the total production this year was less by about 0.6 million tons of the estimated consumption of 2.8 million tons. sugar was being imported to pre-empt any Atta -like crisis and maintain prices at a reasonable level, an official said. The ECC was informed that 1.1 million tons of sugar was in stock while the country's monthly requirement was about 200,000 to 250,000 tons. Reviewing the situation, the EEC noted that two ships carrying "500 tons of wheat would reach Karachi on April 13 and April 15. The committee directed the concerned agencies to ensure expeditious transportation of wheat from Karachi to upcountry. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970412 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill to suppress sectarianism soon, says PM ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bureau Report ISLAMABAD, April 11: Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Friday said a constitutional amendment bill was being prepared to control sectarianism, purge society of heinous crimes and improve law and order. He was talking to newsmen in his chamber in the Parliament House after presiding over the parliamentary party meeting of the PML(N) and its allied parties. The prime minister said his government was firmly committed to reform both the government and society and rid them of corruption. He advised his colleagues not to recommend or bring any kind of pressure on him in support of corrupt officials. "No one should support any corrupt official or show any favouritism towards any corrupt official otherwise he too would be considered as corrupt," the prime minister said. He said that the government was satisfied with the steps being taken to fight corruption but added that the people should not expect overnight changes. The prime minister regretted that an Urdu language newspaper had tried to create an impression that the suspension of 87 officers was an act of victimisation. He said there was no such thing in the mind of the government and it would not be deterred by any one. Nawaz Sharif said the government would not tolerate any obstruction in the way of accountability. "Any effort to create any hindrance will be thwarted," he said. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970409 ------------------------------------------------------------------- PIA to cut some international routes to save money ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, April 8: The PIA plans to cut back several flight operations on some international routes which are not profitable, a senior airline official said. The official while explaining the airline's recently-introduced 'Denied Boarding Compensation Plan' also said that the estimated annual cost to the PIA of such a plan would be between Rs 10 and 15 million. The airline's marketing director Saleh Tareen told a Press conference at PIA headquarters that flights to Athens, Zurich, Beirut and Almaty in Kazakhstan were under review and their sales performance would be evaluated till June after which a decision would be taken whether or not to continue them. The official said that the PIA would start a new flight to Johannesburg by October this year and a new flight to Islamabad at 9 pm every day would be added after the summer. The general manager for reservations, Hamid Khan, who was also present at the briefing said in response to a question said that if any travel agent deliberately overbooks a passenger then that agent would have to pay part of the cost of the compensation promised to the passenger. To another question he said that since the past few months no quotas were set aside for any government officials or parliamentarians. The marketing director said that from May 15 this year the airline would make it possible for travellers on the Lahore, Islamabad and Karachi domestic routes to get their boarding card a day or two in advance provided they were not going to check in any luggage and take only carry-on baggage.

=================================================================== 

BUSINESS & ECONOMY

970407 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Excessive borrowing stymies monetary stability ------------------------------------------------------------------- Muhammad Imtiaz Ali THE Central Board of Directors of the State Bank of Pakistan at its meeting held recently in Lahore has shown its concern over the massive bank borrowing by the government for budgetary support from the banking system. Bank borrowing for budgetary support crossed the Rs. 77 billion mark by the end of February, 1997, a Rs. 40 billion shortfall is feared by year-end and current account is massively imbalanced and consequently recent improvement in the external sector would be neutraliised by the monetary instability. This trend would exert an adverse impact on the country's balance of payments and undo the efforts for the containment of inflation besides crowding out bank credit to the private sector. During the seven months of the current fiscal year, the limits of borrowing fixed in the budget have been crossed by a wide margin. Cutting the government borrowings is also one of the conditionalities of the IMF and the government would find itself in great trouble with the fund (IMF) if the borrowing is not reduced to 4 per cent of the GDP by June, 1997 from its existing level of well over 6 per cent. The grave consequences of uncontrolled bank borrowings were certainly not beyond the comprehension of the government, but it appears to have continue to indulge in this practice detrimental to economic health, under a combination of compulsions, where the government found itself left in a position with no other option but to resort to bank borrowings to meet its current expenditure. In Pakistan revenue generation from both the tax sources and non- tax receipts are quite below their potentials. The statement of the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State, that Pakistan has Rs. 120 billion ($3 billion) work of taxes which has remained uncollected is relevant in this context. The government does not have the political will to tax the feudal lords, particularly in agriculture sector. Lack of documentation of the economy is another major reason for revenue leakage, which is costing the government enormously in terms of tax evasion, made easy by the help of the corrupt bureaucracy. The central bank failed to pursue an appropriate monetary policy during the first three years of the 8th Five-Year Plan, namely, 1993-" to 1995-96. The Central Bank was not able to restrict monetary growth to the Plan's monetary expansion target of 12 per cent per annum mainly because of higher than the targeted expansion of credit to the government to the tune of 30.8 per cent. During these three years the average growth rate of money supply remained 16.1 per cent per yar as against average annual GDP growth rate of 5 per cent, thus creating a massive inflationary gap in the economy. The collection of proper taxes would wipe out the gap and do away the compulsion for burdening the people with additional taxes. The government borrowings being inherently inflationary in nature, not only fuels a general increase in prices of essential commodities in the country but also undermines the economic recovery by taking the funds otherwise available to private sector whose poor performance due to lack of funds available to them, but can frustrate all the efforts targeted at improving the desired level of GDP growth rate. The Government needs to tighten its belt in this regard which calls for a bold exercise backed by a strong political will keeping in view the national interest. Similarly, the recovery of Rs. 140 billion worth of non- performing and defaulted loans can considerably increase the availability of credit in the country. The caretaker government made necessary amendments in the laws on the role of State Bank, enabling the Central Bank to fully control banking sector besides exercising full authority over the formulation and enforcement of monetary policy. The government must taken notice of the State Bank's warning about the excessive borrowing and concentrate its attention on mobilisation of resources through recovery of the defaulted bank loans and accumulated arrears of taxes. Until and unless the government's pre-emotion of bank borrowings for budgetary support is not changed, the private sector would have to face stringency in the availability of bank credit. Thus, the Central Bank should start exerting its weight with a view to check drastically the government spree of bank borrowings, as it now claims to enjoy full autonomy over monetary issues. This will be greatly facilitated by the pursuit of an integrated package of fiscal and monetary reforms designed to bring down the fiscal deficit to 4 per cent of GDP and reduce the current account deficit to 3 per cent of GDP. The consequences of reverting to the excessive bank borrowings by the government for the budget deficit would further add to the difficulties of the present government to deal comfortably with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and any delay in the release of the fund from IMF out of the standby credit, would add to the critical foreign exchange reserves situation, as the current liquid foreign exchange reserves are in the range of $700 to 800 million, i.e. around four weeks import cover barely enough to meet the next quarterly debt repayment. This would adversely effect Pakistan's credit-worthiness. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970407 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal package: 'management by hope' ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Mahnaz Fatima WHILE one would wish the current fiscal effort Godspeed,people are keeping their fingers crossed as the estimated revenue impact has not been announced by the government which is unusual. The package attempts to mobilise the will to pay by bringing about a significant reduction in individual income tax rates and in the corporate tax rates. At the same time, several of the individual income tax exemptions have been withdrawn. Also, the tax credits and exemptions given to the domestic business/industrial sector, amounting to some Rs. 40 billion, will be withdrawn over the next two to three months. One would, therefore, like to know the exact favourable impact on the corporate tax payers as lowering of tax rates, followed by withdrawal of exemptions, might not alter the tax payable significantly. Should this happen, one would then like to know as to how the fiscal package expects to mobilise the will-to-pay if the tax burden is not reduced significantly. Do they expect a significant increase in tax collection by merely simplifying tax calculations? If so, then the claim, about a higher will-to-pay mainly because of reduced tax rates would lose validity. Also, it is the decrease in effective corporate tax rates that needs to be determined. Further, one would like to know the percentage of individual income tax payers who belong to the salaried classes. If their percentage is high, then the claim regarding increased tax collection through a better will to pay, by reducing individual income tax rates, would need to be verified, for, this tax would be less likely to post an increase if contributed mainly by the salaried classes whose income tax is deducted at source regardless of the rates of income tax. Vertical equity An attempt has, however, been made to introduce greater vertical equity in the income tax structure. While the individual income tax rates have been lowered for all, several exemptions on perquisites have been withdrawn and the amount of income tax credit has been reduced. Some people might try to blow income tax exemption withdrawals out of proportion by interpreting this measure as an excess on the salaried classes. It might, however, need to be asserted that those drawing high five-figure and six- figure salaries have absolutely no reason to have their perks exempted from income tax. In fact, the employers and the high- salaried classes connive to have the salaries structured in such a manner that would minimise the tax incidence on them. In a resource-starved country, this disposition of the high-salaried class is no better than the tax evasion tendency in the business classes whom the educated salaried class also condemn routinely for evading taxes. In the interest of vertical equity, it is important to have the perks of high- salaried classes brought into the tax net which is one of the few measures of this fiscal package that deserves strong support. Also, this time, this exemption withdrawal is applicable to both the government and the private sector because of which the private sector employees should have no reason to feel discriminated against. Further, reduction of income tax credit should not be too bothersome for the salaried classes who should be contributing willingly to a troubled economy as they are amongst those fortunate people who can still find gainful employment despite the economic crisis in the country. So, while the package attempts to introduce more vertical equity in the income tax structure, the concept of horizontal equity will be properly introduced only if and when the farm incomes are also taxed commensurately. This serious revenue generation issue has, however, been explained away by simply instructing the provinces to legislate. It is important to recall that while the three smaller provincial governments legislated it, the province of Punjab has been posing the greatest difficulty in this regard as could also be gauged from the failure of the last caretakers who could not even have an ordinance promulgated to this effect there. The intent was announced which never materialised. So, the issue of introducing horizontal equity in the taxation structure has yet to be addressed satisfactorily. The drastic reduction in the rates of Customs duty is worrisome on two counts. First, it is not known as to how the revenue loss will be compensated for in the short to medium-term until the supply-side policies show results if at all and until the irresistible chronic urge to smuggle is overcome. Even if the supply-side works, there will be a time lag which might perhaps be filled with the help of external borrowings which, in turn, will add to the longer term debt burden in case the supply-side measures fail to show the desired results. Second, while some protection has been afforded the engineering sector from competing imports by levying a 35 per cent custom duty on imported engineering goods, there is no mention of protection to the country's electronics and consumer goods industry from competing imports of finished goods. So, cheaper imports, under a liberalised trade regime, will not only convert Pakistan into a dumping ground for foreign imported goods but will also lead to a still more consumptive society developing tastes that will be difficult to satisfy by local producers. Also, it is trading activity that will tend to be encouraged more than domestic production capability and enterprise. And, one wonders as to how the people will be integrated into the development process unless labour-intensive indigenous technology is encouraged in both the industrial and agricultural sectors. The above measures might, however, serve to attract foreign investment by MNCs who already enjoy economies of scale in manufacturing and marketing. Reliance cannot, however, be made for employment generation on foreign investors alone who will bring with them capital-intensive and labour- saving technologies. If the idea is to follow strictly in the footsteps of some rapidly growing East Asian countries, then one would need to learn some other lessons also from their experiences. As stated by the Malaysian Deputy-Prime Minister and Finance Minister Anwar Ibrahim in the context of foreign investment during his last month's visit to Pakistan, "I value contribution and concern of several (industrial) conglomerates who agree to housing, education, and transfer of technology .... you cannot expect a country to grow on imported technology". So, the Malaysian government, while encouraging foreign investment, seeks spill- over social benefits for whatever numbers are employed by MNCs and, above all, transfer of technology so as to develop indigenous capability vital for national economic sovereignty and self-reliance. While the Pakistan government's fiscal package touches upon the 2 per cent contribution from profits to education and health of workers, it will be the practical emphasis and scope that will matter. In reducing tax and tariff rates with a view to encouraging domestic investment, there is again a similarity with the Malaysian economic policy. So, in this context as well, it would again be important to recall what Anwar Ibrahim said. While advocating government supervision and monitoring of private sector activity, the Malaysian finance minister asserted, "The government must also see that companies balance their pursuit of profit with a firm commitment to discharge social responsibility. A government that goes all out to promote private businesses must ensure, through laws and regulations as well as informal incentives and disincentives, that these companies behave as responsible corporate citizens ..... a government that gave unqualified support in selfish businesses would also have to face the anger of the ordinary citizen". Selfish businesses And, it is precisely the selfish pursuit of profits that Pakistan's businesses have remained engaged in primarily in the past which is one of the critical factors that has contributed to the problems of tax evasion and loan defaults. In the 80s, when the private sector was pronounced the engine of growth, businesses proliferated by taking full advantage of the 70-30 per cent debt-equity ratio. Even out of the 30 per cent equity, the sponsors' original contribution came to about 5 per cent with the remaining portion of the equity shared either with institutions, other sponsors, and the general public. So, the original sponsor would recover his 5 per cent share fast, make gains, and move on to go getting other units sanctioned and installed. As the sponsors spread themselves too thin, the units set up thus, met with sponsor/management apathy and neglect which was one of the various factors that contributed to poor business performance and inability to service the loans that the enterprises had obtained. So, while political influences did contribute to loan defaults, another significant contribution was made by management's own lack of interest and attention ion the sponsored units for which they had even borrowed heavily. This is the significance of micro-level business behaviour which, if repeated, will bring us to yet another dead end from which it might be even more difficult to reverse and start another journey. It is little wonder then that all and sundry including the government are adopting a "wait and see" posture and hoping for a miraculous turnaround in the behaviour of business and industry in the country. It is being hoped that growth and development will now occur as a result of tax and tariff cuts. Since many in the country seem inspired by Malaysia in the light of which the rapid tax and tariff cuts are being further justified, it is important to draw even greater insight from their experience, for even if growth occurs, the fruits of growth should be widely shared without expecting another generation or two to wait for the trickle. As aptly stated by the Malaysian finance minister, "By growth we mean good growth, that is, growth with equity, growth that builds solidarity, growth that enhances cultural identity, growth that promotes democracy and civic consciousness, growth that keeps the environment in tact, and, above all, growth guided by ethical precepts". Application of just one or two factors from a successful country's experience will show results only if these factors are supplemented and complemented by a most of all those other factors whose combined application was actually responsible for the success. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970407 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Raising our stature in international trade ------------------------------------------------------------------- Javed Bashir THE REMOVAL of regulatory duty on imports and reduction in customs tariff carries forward the process of reform to encourage export growth However, if Pakistan is to substantially increase its share in world trade from the current 0.2 per cent, a comprehensive approach will have to be adopted for the purpose. The government plans to double its share which means that trade will have to grow at the rate of 20 per cent per annum. Pakistan was not able to benefit from the Uruguay Round due to less than average tariff reduction in its export product area and the slow integration of the textile sector into GATT. Not only must it contribute to development of an efficient export sector, but also meet the challenge of non-tariff barriers being erected by the developed countries. Obligations under the WTO, especially as regards labour standards, health and environment also have to be met. Probably the most worrisome aspect in the export sector is the vulnerability of our leading export products textiles and clothing to restrictive trade regime. There are other significant exports, including leather products, rice, fish and carpets, but the concentrated export structure has led to distortions and restrictions, especially under the MFA. Opportunities in this product area have a major influence on economic growth. With the deadline for the integration into WTO drawing near, the key question is how will Pakistan's textile and clothing industry react to the shock of unrestrained competition with major suppliers. How is Pakistan preparing itself for competition when quotas are phased out by the year 2005? There admittedly will be transitional safeguards whereby an estimated 80 per cent of textile and clothing products, including a large number of value added items, will not be integrated until 2005. This is the time to prepare for the challenge and also adopt short-term measures to boost exports. Recent moves regarding elimination of SROs help to remove some of the perverse features of the tariff structure and aim at making exports relatively efficiency-based. However, additional measures are required to make our exports competitive. Several countries have called for tougher rules that would address anti-competition practices. Their argument is that many international monopolies and cartels generally fall outside the reach of national authorities. Appeals are being made that the WTO should have a role in regulating their activities to ensure that foreigners are not discriminated against. Unfortunately, an understanding of the complex international trading system is lacking just when the powerful industrial countries are adapting WTO rules to their advantage while Pakistan has not even started legislation work for dealing with pressing concerns like customs valuation, intellectual property rights, services, including banking and insurance. Pakistan must identify its weaknesses and strengths to improve its exports because it has the potential to benefit from the tariff reductions by industrial countries in manufactured goods. Under the Uruguay Round, there will be no tariff or quantitative curbs on exports from developing countries on labour-intensive products like furniture and toys. The quality of these products of course has to meet international standards for better market access. In this regard, however, concerns arise from threats posed by new entrants. About 40 per cent of our exports are low skill-based and labour-intensive and hence vulnerable to shifts in demand. Pakistan ought to upgrade the value of goods and also introduce skill intensity into exports. The modern investor is no longer only attracted by low wages leading to low productivity. More and more developing countries are laying emphasis on literacy enhancement and trainability of their workers which have paid dividends. Together with a better understanding of the international trading system joint venture programmes can be evolved to reduce dependence on textile and clothing. To make Pakistan competitive means producing more and more of what the world demands. In this context, increasingly it will be called upon to diversify production by going into new industries and evolving a viable industrial policy. The government has addressed some key aspects of tariff reform. Devaluation has not particularly helped in the past, though an overvalued exchange rate is usually a deterrent to export growth. In Pakistan's context, massive devaluation can have serious implications for debt-servicing in particular. Thus, tackling the high inflation rate should be a major concern. Bringing it down is not easy, but if sustained measures are taken to reduce expenditure, minimise taxation on production, discourage consumption and meet the fiscal deficit, the results can be encouraging. The business community, too, must make efforts to meet the challenge. The task has to take account of market-depressing measures including anti- dumping and counter-vailing duties, but with a better understanding of the WTO and an open trade environment, the going can improve. After all, if Pakistan, like other developing countries, has obligations, it also has rights in the trade regime. The business community would do well to adjust itself to the new challenge in its own interest, updating procedures and modernising trade practices. New issues A whole lot of new issues have been brought into trade. Corruption is also likely to be on the agenda in future. Lack of experience can be major handicap. In this context, the responsibility of the government has also increased manifold. It can greatly help by providing information about standards required, including those in the field of labour and environment, as well as safeguards available to compete in the international market. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970407 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Three-dimensional power crisis looms on horizon ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sultan Ahmed PAKISTAN is heading towards a major three-dimensional power crisis with new developments adding to the old complications. If the chronic shortage of power along with frequent breakdown in supply and planned loadshedding created one set of critical problems for the country, the coming surplus in power and the varied incentives for corruption it offers in our context would create another set of major problems with their tremendous adverse impact on the economy and the balance of payments crisis. Pakistan is committed to buying power from the private sector power producers at 6.5 US cents per unit or kilowatt hour, and that keeps on expressing itself in rising rupee prices as the Pakistan currency continues to be devalued steadily. The higher the power prices and more frequent the rise in rates the stronger the incentive to steal power not only by those living in Katchi Abadis who use Kundas, with or without the help of the KESC staff, but also by industrialists and those who live in posh housing societies and use many air-conditioners. Theft rate A few years ago the rate of theft and loss of power in KESC was around 26 per cent, and as the price of power kept on rising, the rate of theft and loss went on soaring and it now stays at 40 per cent. Mr Mustafa Khar, as minister for power, had ordered the rate of loss and theft should be brought down by June 30 to 24 per cent, but that remains a distant dream, Meanwhile the rate of loss of KESC has risen far above that of WAPDA with its 30 per cent of the power produced, and WAPDA caters to the whole country instead of Karachi alone as KESC does. More and more power is coming on-stream like the 1,350 MW of HUBCO. In addition, other private sector power plants, including those of foreign producers, are coming on-line along with many of the major companies like ICI or the Kohinoor or Mansha Group producing their own power to meet to meet their needs instead of having to pay high prices for the power produced by the private sector and distributed by WAPDA or KESC at a far higher cost. That means the surplus power is on the increase as a result of reduction in demand through under-utilisation by the 4,000 sick industrial units -- of which 2,500 are closed, according to finance minister Sartaj Aziz -- some of the industries producing their own power and selling their surplus, and more large units like coming in stream with HUBCO's 1,350 MW and KESC's own output increasing. The government is committed to buying 60 per cent of the output of private plants but cannot distribute all of it to industrial and commercial users and domestic consumers because of the old transmission and distribution lines. Karachi's transmission and distribution systems are as old as 30 years. Only a small part of that has been replaced in recent years. There, too, very shoddy work has been done as in the case of the two towers at Boating Basin, erected at a cost of Rs 10 million which collapsed after they had lasted for just a year and the guarantees had expired. The official responsible for the loss was not punished but had prior to that been promoted as Managing Director. Inefficient KESC Maintenance and efficiency levels in KESC are so low that last month when the Jamshoro power main to Karachi failed suddenly, the system tripped in too many places in Karachi, but no one seemed to know for long the basic reason. The WAPDA officials at the Jamshoro did not care to inform the KESC officials who suspected all kinds of failures in the city as the main reason for the day long power failure in most parts of the city. This level of inefficiency would not to tolerated, and much less condoned, in any modern country which cares for its industrial efficiency but this has been the norm in Pakistan. Power theft by the powerful is so blatant that a federal minister stole power for his apartment in a luxury complex in the city for years. And that encouraged the sister of a senior staffer of the Prime Minister's secretariat to do alike with absolute impunity. That means the higher the output of power and higher the power rate, the larger will be the theft rate, and consumers who do not steal power pay for those who those who steal. The third dimension of this problem is that as the new power, including HUBCO is based on fuel oil, the oil import bill which is around $2.5 billion now, will go on rising and the projection is that after two years the oil bill may rise to $5 billion. How are we to pay for this additional $2.5 billion at a time when our exports are inching up too slowly and the foreign trade deficit which last year recorded a deficit of $3.6 billion is expanding. The fact is that Pakistan has not only to provide for foreign exchange to import increasing quantities of oil but also furnish the foreign exchange to remit the larger profits of the foreign power producers as well as import spares and other equipment for power production. All that will inflate the foreign exchange needs of the power industry a great deal. We now ought to have rapidly rising foreign exchange earnings to meet such commitments. And they can be come available only if our exports rise rapidly and the value-added in the exports increase steadily. And that calls for a real industrial revolution beginning with full revival of the 4,000 sick industrial units and setting up of new units, particularly in the textile sector, for increasingly value-added exports. Heroin earnings Persons who live in posh bungalows and use a great deal of power and pay for that too, because of their heroin earnings or income from corrupt and criminal practices, will not bring in foreign exchange to the country, at least not to the foreign exchange kitty of the country. So we need a lasting and total industrial and export revolution to pay for the cost of oil and other needs of the new power industry. Meanwhile, there is a real crisis in the established power sector in the country. WAPDA and KESC do not have the money to pay their Rs.6.5 billion oil bills of the PSO. So PSO, the state oil company, has no money to pay Rs 5 billion to the Pakistan Refinery, National Refinery and others. At the other end, the contractors and suppliers of WAPDA have been protesting they have been hit hard by the failure of WAPDA to clear their dues of Rs 2 billion, which they themselves have to pay in their turn to their suppliers. Sui Gas and Sui Northern are in real trouble as the government increased the prices they had to pay to the producers of gas like Pakistan Petroleum, and at the same time the two gas companies have not been allowed to increase their sale price. As a result, the companies are not paying PPL and other gas producers who are in real financial trouble as a result. Sui Southern had assets of Rs 20 billion last year but its pre-tax profit was only Rs 1.04 billion. Sui Northern too had assets of Rs 20 billion last year but its pre-tax profits sank to a dismal Rs.0.67 billion. Compared to that, the PSO had sales of Rs 80.5 billion and pre-tax profit of Rs.4.15 billion, but has a real cash crunch as WAPDA and KESC are not paying their oil bills. Now there is a critical shortfall in gas production which is expected to increase from 1,400 million cubic feet per day now to 8,400 MMCFD per day in December and far worse in the coming years. The shortage is to be met through indigenous efforts to boost gas production following a new policy and import of gas from abroad. But the cost of building a gas pipeline of 910 miles from Turkmenistan to Multan is $2 billion dollars and from South Pars in Iran to Karachi $3 billion, where to get the foreign exchange when the light at the end of our balance of payments tunnel is too murky? Increasing hydel power output can be a better solution ecologically and would cost far less in foreign exchange. But while Kalabagh dam remains too contentious to be built, Ghazi Barotha which is to produce 1,450 MW at a cost $2.25 billion by the year 2000 is making too small a headway for want of enough money. The NWFP has now come up with a scheme to set up 12 hydel plants there with a total capacity of 3,610 MW at a cost of $4,280 million and it has set up a Sarhad Hydel Development Organisation which estimates the province has a total hydel power capacity of 20,000 MW. The problem again will be money and that also means large areas of the province going under water and possible objection from the inhabitants of such areas. Now the government proposes to privates the POL, Oil and Gas Development Corporation and the two gas companies with estimated assets of Rs 81 billion. But how soon will that be done is unclear. Meanwhile, the government has to agree to increase gas prices and lower the theft and loss of gas which has risen to 11 per cent compared to the world average of two per cent. Mr Sartaj Aziz has said that the prices of gas and power would not be increased. But this scribes believes that assurance is valid only until the next budget and not perennially. The new buyers of the gas companies would certainly ask for higher gas prices and preferably a free hand in fixing gas prices. That may become all the more necessary if the massive investment sought for bringing gas from Turkemenistan and Iran are to materialise and foreign investors are to be sufficiently interested in expansion projects with their long gestation periods. The government also proposes to privatise power distribution in Karachi, preferably through four companies as reported, while power production and transmission would remain in government hands. The government hopes to cut down theft of power in this manner. But the unions which vehemently oppose privatising billing in KESC would try to block this process as well in view of the large illegal gains of their members. The model for KESC should be Singapore where the state-owned Singapore Power has lost is monopoly in the island and is going into various new ventures including tele-communication with its large assets of 7 billion dollars and major investments abroad. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970407 ------------------------------------------------------------------- A spectacular act of faith ------------------------------------------------------------------- M.B. Naqvi THE SHORTEST comment on the economic policy package announced by the Finance Minister Sartaj Aziz on March 28 can be: it is a massive act of faith in the business community by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. However, such brief descriptions are not enough in daily life. All the issues involved have to be underlined and interpreted. The government is proposing to forego possibly a lot of money at a time when it is so strapped for cash. Some estimates of the losses to be incurred initially go up to Rs 40 billion. No doubt Mr Sharif regards them as an investment. If Pakistani businessmen respond the way he expects, the eventual results will more than recompense for the losses now being willingly suffered. But it is not a question of simple personal trust by the PM in the good intentions of businessmen and their expected moral behaviour in paying up all the due taxes. There is more to it than individual trust. All of it is based on orthodox economic doctrines that inspire the thinking of his economic team. Only, these doctrines are variously known as Friedmanism, Reaganomics, Neo-classicism or the supply-side economics. The engine of growth under this doctrine is investment. It envisages policies that favour businessmen and enables them to save more of their profits so as to invest more. This is achieved by giving them tax concessions and various incentives to make their job of investment-making easier. This was a sharp departure from the school that had held sway till the late 9170s and early 9180s. The earlier school had relied on demand: An increase in demand was held to drive all the economic motors. Create demand and businessmen will fall over one another to invest in the hope of making profits simply because the demand exists. This particular orientation of economic policies (or demand-led growth) had come to be known as Keynesianism, derived from J.M. Keynes. The Keynesian technique was first designed to tackle the economic mess that the earlier (classical or orthodox) economic policies had created in the 1"0s. Now, those earlier orthodox economic policies were based on ideas that are substantially the same as now underlie Friedmanism. The 1970s was the period when most (developed) governments went broke and their economies were in an unending slump, with widespread unemployment and hunger. By acting according to Keynesian doctrine, Europe, America and other OECD countries performed miracles and overcame and rectified the destruction and dislocation of history's greatest war (1939-45). For about 30 years or more after that war, the world witnessed an unparalleled prosperity; even some newly decolonised economies made limited progress. But Keynsianism also caused a lot of trouble by unleashing inflationary spirals that were sought to be corrected by Friedmanism. This historical reference is only for perspective's sake. No theoretical discussion is intended. In principle the chances of the success of the economic policies now being put in place by Mr Sartaj Aziz are broadly the same as for supply side economics anywhere else. Not that these policies are entirely new. Most finance ministers in recent years have come to believe in them and have been moving in the same direction, only Mr Aziz has moved quickly virtually headlong. Since such policies are working in so many developed countries and also in India reportedly to much advantage, we Pakistanis can also reasonably hope that Mr Sharif is not doing something altogether too extraordinary. The BoP crisis That brings us to the central question. The number one task for the Sharif government is to resolve the balance of payments crisis and then to set the economy on the path of steady growth and further development. He has been explaining his strategy and it made sense (mostly in theory): he would, with the help of his Debt Retirement Fund (DRF) and the proceeds of privatisation retire the outstanding loans, the short-term ones being the first because they carry high interest rates. The revitalisation of the economy and putting it on a growth projector, both as an objective in itself and as a supplementary help for tackling the BoPs crisis. Indeed the primary interest at this stage in the economic package would be whether it would actually serve the subsidiary purpose of helping overcome the BoP crisis the way the PM originally thought. That requires to be assessed. Insofar as the economic package is concerned, it should primarily be seen as an objective in itself, though its utility in the short run is also important. The process that Finance Minister has now started and will be furthered with the next 1997-98 budget. But that will be the initial stage. It will take sometime to get into stride and start producing results. There will be an inevitable time lag. The famous bugbear, viz budget deficit, is not likely to be meaningfully tackled in this and many be even the 1998-99 budget; indeed the next fiscal year would start with a big handicap of reduced resource mobilisation as a result of the tax breaks and other downward rationalisation on tariffs and taxes. That the effect to these measures is likely to be good in subsequent years, though growth processes should be getting into stride soon after the start of 1997-98. That would open up brighter prospects and everyone will agree that this part of the strategy may not offer any material help in the immediate worry over the BoP deficit. On the contrary, the immediate impact might not be good at all. Thus the reliance for tackling the BoP crisis will remain on (a) DRF; (b) other short-term loans and (c) IMF help, as an outside chance. Something more needs to be said about the IMF. Ties with IMF As of now, relations with the IMF are in deep freeze and the hopeful sounding statements from it notwithstanding. It has suspended the Standby arrangements and no money is to be expected on that account. The government hopes that the economic policy package of March 28, would impress the IMF -- indeed it was calculated to do so seems to have done so -- that it may start negotiations with Islamabad for a ESAF/EFF loan of $1.5 billion over three years at 0.5 per cent. The hope includes the time-frame, i.e. that by August/ September. But the negotiations can only start by the third quarter of the current calendar year or perhaps just after it; IMF can scarcely afford not to examine the 1997-98 Budget for its likely impact. Insofar as hopes are concerned, there is nothing more to be said; they are just hopes. For its part, IMF authorities are neither hobgoblins nor are they simpletons. As hard-nosed bankers they would assess the chances of the hopes and would wait until the expected results start flowing in before they disburse any tranche of the new loan, supposing they agree to negotiate and do make the agreement in about the timeframe that Mr Sartaj Aziz has in mind. The IMF people have actually been exasperated by the conduct of Islamabad over the implementation of agreed conditionalities. They are also probably somewhat frightened by Islamabad's inability to deliver. Insofar as it can be ascertained and assessed, their quiet insistence on such stark reductions in expenditures is still there. The reason is that they do not believe that the government can actually realise all the taxes it imposes, thanks largely to the non-tax paying culture of the business community, the obverse of which is the corruption in tax collecting machinery. It will take some time and actual results to convince the IMF that a turnaround has taken place in revenue collections; mere statements, new policies and hopes are not going to be enough for them. That leaves the BoP problem where it was. The purport of all this is that the IMF help for the BoP crisis cannot be relied upon in any near future. The effort has to concentrate on the DRF and more loans. The real difficulty in the BoP today is that most of the short-term loans that become due for repayment are required to be paid back; most international banks, with the given credit rating of the country, may be reluctant to let them be rolled over. That is the real crisis. Which is why debt servicing requirements have shot through the roof. The reliance, as we have seen, has to be on the DRF and whatever money the Privatisation Fund can spare in hard currencies. Insofar as the latter is concerned, its ability to foot the entire bill for retiring the short-term loans is limited by its own cash inflows that are themselves relatively a longer-term proposition. The PF's ability to provide substantial amount of hard currencies in the short run is doubtful. Its contributions can only be expected in the next two or three years, at the earliest, if the privatisation processes are to remain scientific and transparent. One particular difficulty that the government will face is the Budget of 1997-98. It is bound to show reduced revenues and thus higher budget deficits. This is sure to put off the IMF and World Bank experts. Insofar as their recommendation on drastic reductions in budget deficit is concerned, it is easier said than done. Islamabad and IMF cannot be accused of contemplating a reduction in debt servicing, much less in defence, which are the only two substantially big items in which cuts will mean anything. The problem is sure to be aggravated with the multilateral agencies largely because of the twin failures of Islamabad: in cutting expenditures by notably hefty margins and in raising more revenues while the ambience of high inflation persists. Meanwhile, the BoP crisis seems likely to persist for the next two to three years. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970408 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Consultation on Islamic banking ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ansar Abbasi ISLAMABAD, April 7: The government is contacting top bankers both within and outside the country to evolve an Islamic banking system in Pakistan as announced by the Prime Minister in his inaugural speech on February 26. Senator Raja Zafarul Haq, who has been made chairman of the committee for the elimination of Riba (interest) from economic system of Pakistan, told Dawn that a senior official of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had also been invited to give his views on the government's proposed move. The Senator, said that he had already contacted the experts from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Sudan and some other Islamic countries to propose a practicable Islamic economic system for Pakistan. Abbas Mirakhor, the Executive Director in the IMF, Raja said, had also been contacted to give his view on the subject. "I have already met the senior executives of Al-Faysal Bank and heads of different banks in Pakistan to take advantage of their experiences," he said. The Senator said that the recommendations of the Council of Islamic Ideology and works of scholars like Dr Ziauddin, head of Islamic Department, Islamic University Islamabad, Dr Nijatullah Siddiqi were also being consulted for switchover to the new system. He expected that the members of the committee would be appointed anytime during this week so that the assignment could be completed without unnecessary delay. Responding to a query, he said there would be no compromise on Sharia't and the recommendations would be formulated with utmost care. He informed that a very large number of banks in different parts of the world were operating without Riba. "Even the international banks like Merill Lynch have also introduced a section of interest-free banking," he said and added, "this is being done because it has been found feasible and practicable by the international bankers." Without giving any deadline for the completion of committee's recommendations, he said the proposal when framed would be put before the country's top economists and Ulema for further consideration. To understand the exact meaning of Riba which is an evil in Islam, he said the people were required to be educated. He disagreed with the existing general perception of Riba. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970410 ------------------------------------------------------------------- IMF keen to know cost of economic reforms ------------------------------------------------------------------- Mohiuddin Aazim KARACHI, April 9: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has asked Pakistan to disclose the cost of the recently-announced economic reforms but it has set no deadline for the purpose. "There is no question of setting deadlines," a source close to the IMF told Dawn on Wednesday. "But we are consulting Pakistani authorities to know what is the cost of the reforms." The Fund is eager to know this so that it can evaluate the reforms and project its possible impacts. "Pakistan also needs to work out the cost of the reforms for its own use," said the source adding that it would help in drawing up the budget. Finance Minister Mr. Sartaj Aziz and Finance Secretary Mr. Moin Afzal could not be reached immediately to learn what is being done in this regard. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970411 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Working group to simplify IT Ordinance ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ihtashamul Haq ISLAMABAD, April 10: The federal government has appointed a six-member working group headed by deputy chairman planning commission Dr. Hafiz Pasha to recommend improvement in the "Income Tax Ordinance" for increasing the number of tax-payers in the country. Informed sources told Dawn that the minister for commerce Ishaq Dar presided over here on Thursday a meeting of the Tariff Reform Committee to look into the issue of increasing the tax payers without harassing them. Dar is the Convener of the Committee while prime minister's advisor on law and justice, Khalid Anwar, Interior minister Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, Lt.Gen(retd) Majid Malik, Secretary finance and chairman Central Board of Revenue(CBR) are the member of the committee. Sources said that the commerce minister told the meeting that the government desperately needed funds which could only be generated if the number of tax payers were increased without harassing and creating problems for them. And that was why a working group was set up which will finalise its recommendations before the end of April to be placed before the cabinet for final approval and effective implementation. Advisor on Law and parliamentary affairs Khalid Anwar inquired about various things to improve the prevailing Income Tax Ordinance. He particularly asked secretary commerce Iqbal Farid, who has long been associated with the CBR specially as member income tax, as to why there has not been any serious effort to increases the number of tax-payers. Sources said that the meeting also deliberated on the issue of simplifying the Income tax Ordinance which was said to be too complicated and vague. The meeting was of the view that since there was no documentation of the economy, the effective implementation on the ordinance was not possible. Khalid Anwar told the meeting that prime minister did not want harassment of the old and new tax payers and that matters pertaining to increasing tax base of the country be sorted out in a harmonious manner. However sources said that it was the consensus of the meeting that the concealment of income tax be taken very seriously and that new laws be framed to deal with the problem. Both the minister for Commerce and advisor on Law said that those who had the potential to pay their tax should be advised to pay before any strict action was taken against them. The meeting expressed satisfaction over the curtailment of the powers of the income tax officers to visit the premises of the tax-payers. Sources said that the working group would assess as to how much was being paid as income tax by the bigger markets such as Liberty and Shah Almi of Lahore and various others of the country. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970412 ------------------------------------------------------------------- KSE 100-share index suffers fresh fall of 6.31 points ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, April 11: Share values on the Karachi Stock Exchange on Friday fell further but larger decline was resisted thanks to the presence of stray institutional support at the dips. However, physical activity was significantly affected by Sharjah cricket cup final match between Pakistan and Sri Lanka as a good number of leading brokers were busy listening to commentary rather than share trading. The absence of cricket lovers from the rings is well reflected in the lower volume of about 27m shares from the average daily turnover of 40m shares. The KSE 100-share index showed a fresh fall of 6.31 points at 1,549.83 as compared to 1,556.14 a day earlier, reflecting the weakness of the base shares. The breach of the resistance level of 1,550 though fractionally signals that the current downward slide will continue during the next week too despite strong selective support on some of the blue chips, some dealers said. But some others said the market did rebound more than twice after breaching the psychological barrier of 1,550 during the last three months and this time too it will behave in the same fashion and the coming week could see a lot of covering purchases at the lower levels. Floor brokers said although there was no change in political background news, notably the Sindh politics, as meeting between the leaders of the Sindh coalition partners has partially defused the current tension. "News that the government has finalized a package $2.3bn for the consortium aid after the budget sometime in June is expected to boost the market by the next week", they added. They based their perception on expected boost as it reflected the confidence of donor countries in the potentials of Pakistan's economy. What was more disturbing was that the textile sector which had been showing signs of recovery during the last several weeks again ran into profit- selling and erasing most of the previous gains. Cement, energy and bank shares did attract stray support at the lower levels but it was too feeble to evoke a sympathetic support on other counters. The declining issues were,therefore, again led by some leading MNC, notably Lever Brothers, Pakistan Gum Chemicals, Pak-Suzuki Motors and Parke-Davis, which suffered decline ranging from Rs 1.25 to 5. Among the local blue chips, which followed their lead included PSO,ICP SEMF, Adamjee Insurance, Gatron Textiles and IGI, falling by one rupee to Rs.2. Textile shares, which showed large decline were led by Ideal Spinning, Premier Textiles, Tariq Cotton and Star Textiles, while others fell fractionally. However, all was not bad as some of the leading shares managed to finish modestly higher under the lead of Pakistan Oilfields, Singer Pakistan, D.G.Khan Cement and Grays Leasing, falling by one rupee to Rs 2. Javed Omer, Ghani Glass, Burshane Pakistan and Benz Industries also rose modestly on stray short-covering. Trading volume fell to 26.520m shares from the previous 48.752m shares owing to the absence of leading dealers. The interesting feature was that PTC again assumed the role of the most active scrips after relegating the ICI Pakistan into the secondary position. The most active list was topped by PTC vouchers, lower 15 paisa on 8m shares followed by ICI Pakistan, easy five paisa on 6.500m shares, Hub- Power, down 15 paisa on 5m,Dewan Salman, easy five paisa on 3.100m and FFC- Jordan Fertilizer, off 25 paisa on 1.200m shares. Other actively traded shares were led by D.G.Khan Cement, up 15 paisa on 0.600m shares, followed by Dhan Fibre, easy five paisa on 0.500m, Maple Lead Cement, unchanged on 0.2'm and Nishat Fabrics, up 70 paisa on 0.135m shares. There were some other actively traded shares also. There were 296 actives, out of which 183 shares suffered fall while 43 rose, with 70 holding on to the last levels. ------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBSCRIBE TO HERALD TODAY ! ------------------------------------------------------------------- Every month the Herald captures the issues, the pace and the action, shaping events across Pakistan's lively, fast-moving current affairs spectrum. Subscribe to Herald and get the whole story. Annual Subscription Rates : Latin America & Caribbean US$ " Rs. 2,700 North America & Australasia US$ " Rs. 2,700 Africa, East Asia Europe & UK US$ 63 Rs. 1,824 Middle East, Indian Sub-Continent & CAS US$ 63 Rs. 1,824 Please send the following information : Payments (payable to Herald) can be by crossed cheque (for Pakistani Rupees), or by demand draft drawn on a bank in New York, NY (for US Dollars). Name, Postal Address, Telephone, Fax, e-mail address, old subscription number (where applicable). Send payments and subscriber information to : G.M Circulation, The Herald P.O.Box 3740, Karachi, Pakistan We also accept payments through American Express, Visa or Master Card. Allow 45 days for first issue.
Back to the top.
=================================================================== 

EDITORIALS & FEATURES

970406 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Consistent honesty? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ardeshir Cowasjee HOW fortunate can a man be? Take me, for example. I have had the pleasure of knowing, partaking of their wisdom, and enjoying the company of Allah Baksh Kadir Baksh Brohi, Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada, and Brohi's protege, Khalid Anwer. Friend Brohi is with us no more. Friend Sharifuddin is very much around, but for the time being enjoying a sabbatical. One can but admire his self- confidence, as he is still sure that he can convince his Maker (if his Maker will hear him) that all he has done upon this earth has been good and just. Khalid is on his way up. He successfully had Nawaz's dissolution overturned. He successfully had Benazir's dissolution upheld. Now he has had 58(2)(b) erased from the Book. As a member of the government, he bears a great deal of the collective responsibility for any action taken by this government, for he is by far the brightest, the most finely educated, the most well-read, and the most balanced of the democrats amongst whom he sits. How often can a man write the same thing, over and over again: "Every citizen of this country who can read, write and think, can say without any fear of contradiction that it is, and always has been, the intent of all our leaders (barring the first), to enforce their will, to tailor the constitution and all of the laws of the land and to interpret them to suit their own special needs so that they may remain in power for ever. During the early years, the leaders did make some sort of effort to pretend that they had the interests of the country and its people at heart, bogus though it may have been, but since 1 -- 1 even pretence has been discarded. Now, it is total blatant glasnost; machinations, schemes and scams are publicly, fearlessly and contemptuously aired. "The whole wise world knows that whatsoever be the foundation of a democratic government, whether it be the Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence, 'Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite', the Objectives Resolution, or whatever, the democratic grundnorm is firmly based on the belief expostulated by Jefferson,'that all men are created equal and independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent and inalienable, among which are the preservation of life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness' ". The 1973 Constitution was passed by consensus by the many members who believed that as it guaranteed fundamental rights it was better than no constitution at all -- and certainly better than martial law. None dissented. The few who were not happy with it abstained. Before the ink was dry, within four hours of its promulgation, the people of Pakistan were deprived of all their constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights through a Gazette Notification issued by the maker of the Constitution, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Fundamental rights having been rendered non-justifiable, he had all his political opponents arrested. They were held in various jails until released by Zia four years later. Not satisfied with the Notification, Bhutto had his constitution amended seven times between its promulgation on August 14, 1973, and July 5, 1977, the date of his fall from grace. An amendment of a constitution is an extraordinary measure necessitating a great deal of deliberation on the part of the ruling party, consultation with the opposition, and a careful and objective study of public opinion on the subject. Its passage through the legislature must be deliberately regulated to ensure full discussion, to provide ample opportunity for criticism. According to the rules of procedure that govern parliamentary procedure under the 1973 Constitution, a bill, other than a finance bill, upon its introduction in the house must be referred to the relevant standing committee, unless the requirements of the rules have been dispensed with by the house through a motion of the relevant member. The standing committee is asked to present its report within 30 days. When this is received, copies of the bill (and any changes recommended by the committee) are to be supplied to each member within seven days. Two clear days must then elapse before the bill can be sent down for motion. These rules were suspended by Bhutto for the passage of the Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh amendment Bills. The First Amendment Bill was introduced in the house on April 15, 1974. The standing committee presented its report the next day and within a week it was passed leaving no time for debate. The Third Amendment Bill was introduced on February 11, 1975, the required report was presented and the Bill passed the next day. However, in those days men did exist who did object to the roughshod methods used to bulldoze amendments through the house, men such as 'Tiger' Mahmud Ali Kasuri, Malik Mohammed Suleman, Chaudhry Zahur Elahi, Mufti Mahmood, Prof Ghafoor Ahmed, and Ahmed Raza Kasuri. At one point, upon the instructions of the Speaker, Mahmud Ali Kasuri, and Zahur Elahi were physically lifted and thrown out of the house. The others were manhandled and pushed out. This was done by men brought in by the Sergeant-at-Arms as instructed by the Prime Minister who was in the house that day watching the operation. Then came the Zia-Junejo era. The Eighth Amendment Bill was passed in 1985. The rules were not suspended. Debates continued for around six months before it was passed. The Ninth Amendment Bill (concerning Islamic injunctions) was introduced but never passed. The Tenth Amendment Bill, a bread-and-butter bill (amending Article 54 and 61) was passed after due deliberation. The Eleventh Amendment Bill (women's seats) was introduced in Benazir Bhutto's first round and was not passed. The Twelfth Amendment Bill (special courts) was introduced by Nawaz Sharif in his firs round, the rules were suspended, it was rushed through with little discussion and passed. The thirteenth Amendment Bill was introduced in both the National Assembly and the Senate on the same day, April 1, and it was passed that same day, without any discussion, without one member ever rising to ask why the rules were suspended, or to suggest there be a discussion. The government and the opposition unanimously approved its passage. Not a dog barked. The only occasions in the past where there has been complete unanimity between the treasury and the opposition have been on those occasions when bills have been introduced concerning the salaries, perks and privileges of the honourable members. The motivation on those occasions was pure greed. The motivation on April 1, was also greed, greed for unrestrained power. This is what the Thirteenth Amendment is all about: Article 58(2): Notwithstanding anything contained in clause 2 of Article 48, the President may also dissolve the National Assembly in his discretion where, in his opinion -- (a) a vote of no-confidence having been passed against the Prime Minister, no other member of the National Assembly is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the National Assembly in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, as ascertained in a session of the National Assembly summoned for the purpose; or (b) a situation has arisen in which the Government of the Federation cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and an appeal to the electorate is necessary. (b) deleted Article 101 (1): There shall be a Governor for each Province who shall be appointed by the President after consultation with the Prime Minister. Now reads: There shall be a Governor for each province who shall be appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister. Article 112(2): The Governor may also dissolve the Provincial Assembly in his discretion, but subject to the previous approval of the President, where in his opinion: (a) a vote of no-confidence having been passed against the Chief Minister, no other member of the Provincial Assembly is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Provincial Assembly in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, as ascertained in a session of the Provincial Assembly summoned for the purpose; or (b) a situation has arisen in which the Government of the Province cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and an appeal to the electorate is necessary. (b) deleted Article 243 (2): The President shall, subject to law, have power -- (a) to raise and maintain the Military, Naval and Air Forces of Pakistan; and the Reserves of such Forces; (b) to grant Commissions in such Forces; and (c) to appoint in his discretion the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, the Chief of the Army Staff, the Chief of the Naval Staff and the Chief of the Air Staff, and determine their salaries and allowances. In (c) "the words in his discretion" are omitted. Nawaz Sharif and his government had all the power needed with their two- thirds majority to enable them to do good by the people. Were their intentions honest and clean, they should have had absolutely no fears of even the possibility of 58(2)(b) being used against them. However, they know that amendment or no amendment, the real power rests where it always has rested. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970410 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Let 8th Amendment go as a whole ------------------------------------------------------------------- Senator Iqbal Haider AT long last the controversial Article 58(2)(b) of the Constitution has been repealed by the Constitution (thirteenth Amendment) Bill passed unanimously by both houses of the Parliament. Such unanimity on a constitutional issue is by itself an event to cherish and be proud of. It is almost after 24 years that the nation has seen such a demonstration of unanimity/consensus among all the political parties in the parliament. The Thirteenth Amendment Bill is historic not only for repealing the infamous Article 58(2)(b) but also for creating the needed understanding, harmony and consensus among the political leaders in this otherwise polarised political atmosphere. It is a matter of pride that when the nation is celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of its independence such an unprecedented demonstration of unity and understanding has taken place, giving the lie to the propaganda that even after fifty years of its existence, Pakistan is still in search of a viable system of governance. Now we can claim with confidence that people of Pakistan continue to have faith in the federal parliamentary democracy as envisaged by the father of the nation, Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah. Such consensus and understanding is not easy to achieve. We were fortunate to have it on this constitutional issue. This congenial atmosphere should be used for achieving consensus on other issues and challenges faced by the nation. It is necessary to take the initiatives now on other national issues before the new bipartisan spirit is ruined by events and developments generating conflicts and contention. The issues which need immediate attention and consensus are those relating to: (a) National security and foreign policy; (b) nuclear technology; (c) solution of the Kashmir issue; (d) restoration of peace in Afghanistan; (e) economic reforms, including settlement of terms and conditions with donor countries and institutions; (f) administrative reforms to curb corruption and promote efficiency; (g) Electoral reforms, including introduction of proportional system of representation; (h) census; and (i) accountability in a transparent and effective manner and eradication of ethnic and sectarian prejudices, conflicts, etc. The Pakistan People's Party by lending wholehearted cooperation and support (which was not even sought by the other side) to the PML has once again demonstrated that irrespective of personal gains or losses, the PPP does not hesitate to co-operate with its opponents on national issues. It can, therefore, be reasonably inferred that the government would enjoy the co- operation and support of the PPP on other national issues listed above. Some critics are of the view that the repeal of Article 58(2)(b) will create an imbalance in power and there will be no effective check on the abuse of authority by the prime minister. This is not a well-founded criticism simply because if Article 58(2)(b) is retained then, there is no check on the abuse of authority by the president. At least on two occasions -- the dismissal of the Junejo government in 1988 and the dismissal of Nawaz Sharif's government in 1993 97 the Supreme Court held that there was no justification in law for dissolving the assemblies and dismissing the governments by the then presidents in exercise of powers under Article 58(2)(b). Since the president is not answerable to the parliament or the people, there are virtually no checks on him in the event of abuse of authority by him. In case of the prime minister, he can be held accountable not only by the people when elections take place but also by the representatives of the people in the two houses of parliament. In comparison to the president, there are more checks built into the system for the prime minister. However, one can justifiably argue that there is need to have more effective checks on the abuse of authority by the prime minister or the cabinet but such checks should be exercised more effectively by improving the performance of the parliament and its standing committees instead of empowering the president who is neither answerable to the parliament nor to the people. Abuse of power can also be effectively prevented by exercise of self- restraint. The greater the power vested in any office, greater is the restraint that has to be exercised to ensure effective full-term governmental tenure. If this principle is followed by the persons in authority, may it be prime minister or president, lesser violation, lesser objection and lesser confusion will arise. One cannot emphasise more on exercise of power with restraint, moderation and tolerance. The thirteenth Constitution Amendment is no doubt a very positive and bold step to strengthen the parliamentary form of government and to remove undesirable provisions inserted into the basic law during the martial law. The only disappointing aspect of the Thirteenth Amendment is that it seeks to delete just those provisions of the Constitution which had curtailed powers of the prime minister. It appears that perhaps the Bill has been motivated with the personal desire to seek more powers and protection for the prime minister rather than to correct and strengthen the system and institutions of parliamentary democracy. I am constrained to say so because the Eighth Amendment had made more than 40 changes in the Constitution. Besides the four provisions deleted by the last Amendment, there are other provisions of the Eighth Amendment which are equally undesirable and consensus exists for further amending or repealing the same. Some of such non-controversial but undesirable provisions of the Eighth Amendment which deserve immediate attention and action by the Parliament are: 1. Article 41(7) relating to the appointment of Gen. Ziaul Haq as president of Pakistan for a further period of five years from the date of the joint sitting of the parliament after the general elections of 1985, without following the procedure prescribed in the Constitution for the election of the president. This Article has become redundant and deserves to be deleted forthwith. 2. Article 51(4) relating to the reserved seats for women. Lack of representation of women in the assemblies, who constitute about 50% of our population has been resented by most political parties and all sections of opinion. There is consensus on the restoration of reserved seats for women. Now that the PML is committed to the restoration of reserved seats for women and enjoys more than two-thirds parliamentary majority, there is no reason or justification to defer or delay the matter of women's seats. In fact, it should have been its priority to make the two houses of parliament more representative. 3. Article 51(1) was amended in an attempt to establish separate electorate for minorities. The issue whether the separate electorate system introduced during Zia's martial law period is valid and in accordance with the Constitution is still pending before the Supreme Court. The joint electorate system was envisaged by the Quaid-i-Azam and was followed until the martial law of Gen. Zia-ul-Haq. The addition of words "Muslim seats" made through the Eighth Amendment, should be deleted to ensure that the joint electorate system is restored. 4. In Article 51(2)(b) the age-limit of votes was increased from 18 to 21 years through the Eighth Amendment. This Article needs to be amended forthwith to restore the limit of 18 years for the voters. 5. Like Article 58(2)(b), there is another Article 210A which has also remained the centre of controversy. Though during debate in the parliament, in 1985 this Article was improved as compared to its original version, it is still far too wide in its application and is undesirable. It has to be replaced by a more appropriate and reasonable provision which may facilitate the repeal or amendment of many of the orders and actions of Gen. Ziaul Haq to ensure the supremacy of parliament and protection of fundamental rights. I have listed above only few of the provisions of the Eighth Amendment which, in my view, are least controversial and deserve correction, amendment or repeal at the earliest. It appears that perhaps to minimise the controversy and expedite the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, the treasury benches avoided touching the provisions listed above. It is still not too late to present before the budget session of the National Assembly another comprehensive bill to amend the Constitution to make necessary amendments and deletions as suggested above as well as to remove the other undesirable provisions of the Eighth Amendment. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970412 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Destiny of the subcontinent ------------------------------------------------------------------- Mazdak A BREAKFAST meeting does not often hold out the possibility of shaping the destiny of a subcontinent, but when the Indian and Pakistani foreign ministers broke bread together in New Delhi, their talks had a symbolic importance far greater than the outcome. It has never ceased to amaze me that two neighbouring nations with a combined population of a billion people could adopt such a childish stance towards sorting out their differences. While individuals -- and immature individuals at that -- may be able to afford the luxury of living in a perpetual sulk, states cannot. There has been so much talk of principles in both capitals that one would think that the rest of the world is totally unprincipled, while only India and Pakistan adhere to lofty moral ideals. And yet the rest of the world is moving rapidly forward, while South Asia slips further and further behind: according to a recent UN report, we figure behind even sub-Saharan Africa in the poverty sweepstakes. And Pakistan is among the most illiterate nations on earth; not surprisingly, it also has one of the highest population growth rates in the world. But despite our ignorance, an unsophisticated, unlettered villager from the remotest part of the country could put his finger on the problem: we have to reduce our defence spending if we are to break free of the vicious cycle of poverty, low productivity and backwardness. Despite the obvious inference to be drawn from the bloated and no-longer- tenable defence budgets in both nations, there are powerful vested interests that have consistently opposed and blocked rapprochement. The fact that we have been unable to even initiate a dialogue for years speaks volumes for the frozen attitudes and rigid mindset governing decision- making in Islamabad and New Delhi. The conventional wisdom so far has been that being the bigger power, India should make the first conciliatory move. However, this equation has been overturned with the emergence of new political realities: while Pakistan now enjoys a strong, stable government for the first time in years, India seems destined to suffer under weak and shaky coalitions for the foreseeable future. Thus, it will be for Nawaz Sharif to set the tempo, and it is within his reach to make the concessions necessary to achieve lasting peace. This does not imply that we give up any of our key demands; it does, however, make it possible for the Pakistan government to defer negotiations on the thorny issue of Kashmir to some future date, while addressing other, less contentious problems at the initial stage. Indeed, this is what Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general has suggested recently. Granted that this seems a step backward from our maximalist, Kashmir-or-nothing stand, but in the real world, one often has to make some concessions initially to get part of what one wants. While the explosive Kashmir problem is put on the back-burner -- hopefully with the heat turned low -- we can get on with life and discuss a host of outstanding issues without compromising our security or our basic interests. The idea is for both countries to benefit from normalized relations and then come back to Kashmir when the temperature has dropped to normal. For instance, consumers, businessmen and the exchequers of both countries stand to gain through an increase in trade. The fear in Islamabad is that we will be overwhelmed by Indian products; according to friends in the manufacturing sector, this apprehension is unjustified as they are confident that our products have a qualitative edge that would offset the price advantage enjoyed by their Indian counterparts. Also, we can establish a system of quotas to ensure a reasonable balance. In any case, if our consumers do get a break, why should we object when we are willing to import finished goods from Europe and the far East at higher prices? We should also remember that within a year or so, we will be surplus in electricity, while India is suffering from serious shortages. Also, with gas pipelines planned from Central Asia and Iran, Pakistan is ideally placed to charge substantial royalty payments from India. All these will offset any surplus India accumulates on trade. The attraction of such a huge market will also lure in foreign investment for projects based in Pakistan but exporting to India. Our own entrepreneurs will also enjoy economies of scale hitherto not available to them. One low-cost, low-risk area to explore is an increase in cultural exchanges. In 1989, the governments of Benazir Bhutto and Rajiv Gandhi had concluded a cultural agreement which included cooperation across a wide spectrum of activities. As far as I know, this pact is still theoretically in force, and can be reactivated. Here again is a domain where we do not need to fear an Indian invasion: our ghazal singers command vast followings in India, as does Nusrat Fateh Ali. Performers and audiences will both benefit, and our artists in both countries will gain from exposure to each others' work. Our cinema might not survive the celluloid onslaught from across the border, but I don't think it deserves to. Sports is another area that has suffered from the freeze in relations: regular exchanges will raise the standards, and would enhance the income of our poorly paid sportsmen. It is a disgrace that our cricket teams have to travel to third countries like Canada to compete against each other, thus denying us the pleasure of seeing them in action. It will be argued that these contacts will somehow weaken the resolve of the Kashmiri freedom fighters and devalue their struggle. But if the stakes are lowered, Indian repression would be proportionately reduced. In any case, it is abundantly clear after two wars and eight years of bloodshed that freedom cannot be won for Kashmiris by force of arms alone. Also, the divergence between the Pakistani and the majority Muslim Kashmiri positions has become more marked with the passage of time: Islamabad has continued to insist on the 50-year old formula of a plebiscite to decide whether the state will go to India or Pakistan, while a section of the younger generation of Kashmiris is fighting for freedom from both their neighbours. Given the passions this bone of contention continues to arouse, it makes eminent sense to put it aside for the time being. In the long run, Kashmiris will benefit from economic growth in India and Pakistan. During the onerous restrictions that are in force today. The consulates in Karachi and Bombay -- closed in a fit of pique -- can be re-opened. None of these measures will cost very much to implement, but their tangible and intangible benefits to a billion people will be incalculable. Nawaz Sharif has shown great political maturity and courage in initiating a fresh dialogue, and the ball is in the Indian court. Hopefully, the leadership that emerges out of the current crisis in New Delhi will match the Pakistani initiative, so the rest of us can get on with life without forever being held hostage by the past.

===================================================================

SPORTS

970406 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nottinghamshire sign Pakistan pacer Zahid ------------------------------------------------------------------- Samiul Hasan KARACHI, April 5: Pakistan's representation in the English County circuit increased to five when immensely talented Mohammad Zahid signed a one-year contract with Nottinghamshire. Nottinghamshire has now pinned their hopes on Mohammad Zahid as their last season's overseas player, Chris Cairns, has expressed his inability to come down because of a likely surgery of the knee. "I have signed a one-year contract with Nottinghamshire at a lucrative amount," the 21-year-old Zahid said from Sharjah where he is with the Pakistan cricket team, adding: "I signed the contract some 15 days ago." "I have been given an understanding that if the county finishes among top 10, I will be awarded another six-year contract. However, if the county finished low with my performance being good I will be booked for three years," Zahid added. The Chief Executive of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), Majid Khan, confirmed late Saturday evening that the Notts had approached him for Zahid. "But I have told them clearly that it was a matter between the player and the county and it had nothing to do with the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). Sources, requesting anonymity, said Zahid has signed a pound sterling 60,000 contract besides other financial benefits chiefly through sponsorships. Zahid, who sounded excited, said he had consulted his seniors before accepting the proposal. "I talked to Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis and Mushtaq Mohammad. The three were unanimous in their opinion that I should grasp the opportunity with both hands because County cricket was still one of the best institutions to hone the skills of a bowler." Mohammad Zahid burst into international scene in the home series against New Zealand when he grabbed a match haul of 11 wickets on his debut -- the best-ever performance by a Pakistani on his maiden appearance. But Zahid earned real fame when he caused problems for world's best batsman, Brian Lara, in the World Series Cup which Pakistan won for the first time in 17 years. Zahid, born on Aug 2, 1976 in Gaggu Mandi, a village 12-km outside Burewala, is said to be a yard quicker than Waqar Younis and Allan Donald. "He is very very fast. He is not only quicker off the wicket but also in the air. His yorkers are well directed," Wasim Akram, upon his return from Australia, had said about Zahid. After Zahid has accepted the offer, he becomes the fifth Pakistan bowler to play in the English County Championship. Others are Wasim Akram (Lancashire), Waqar Younis (Glamorgan), Mushtaq Ahmad (Somerset) and Mohammad Akram (Northamptonshire). The interesting point to be noted here is that in the past, it were the Pakistan batsmen that dominated the English circuit while now it is the supremacy of the bowlers. The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) not only needs to keep a closer eye that none of its bowlers are over-bowled, positive steps are required to be taken so that some more stroke-makers come in the limelight and attract the English counties after excelling while playing for Pakistan. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970407 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Betting & bribery charges damaging ------------------------------------------------------------------- Qamar Ahmed Pawnbrokers, punters and the betting shops are a part of the economy of a great number of the countries. The sight of people waging money on one of their favourite horses or on a greyhound to get past the post first is not uncommon even in cricket playing countries like Britain, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, West Indies or India. What is unusual in countries where betting is legal is the element of bribery. Not to say that it does not happen. In fact it does, but in very rare cases, and the officials and the people connected with sports are known to have been apprehended because of it and held in contempt. The bribery controversy that rages now in Pakistan because of allegations made by a couple of cricketers against their colleagues is indeed alarming. It has unquestionably tarnished Pakistan's cricket image. If only Justice Fakhruddin Ebrahim had in his verdict on Salim Malik taken full account of the whole allegations, things would not have come to this, the ugly accusations and allegations being hurled from every corner. Pakistan in its Golden Jubilee Year cannot afford to malign its sportsmen for what they have achieved over the years for their country, without any concrete evidence. People incharge of the inquiry must sit down along with the accusers and the accused to sort out the controversy. Or else there will be a lot more to lose than to gain. Pakistan has a very tough schedule ahead. After Sharjah, a Test tour to Sri Lanka, Independence Cup in India, Pakistan 'A' tour to England, Asia Cup in Sri Lanka, Sahara Cup in Canada, India in Pakistan in September, South Africa and West Indies in Pakistan during the year and then Pakistan touring South Africa and West Indies in the early part of the next year is a programme which will need a lot of thinking and planning. What Pakistan should do now is to concentrate more on how to keep the players in good trim for such a rigorous schedule than to grind them and grill them under the pressure of allegations which may adversely affect everyone if no proper evidence is provided. For Pakistan it is non-stop cricket for next twelve months if one takes into account the engagements of the Pakistani professionals in the English counties and there after Pakistan 'A' team's tour to England coming June is also very vital. The second string must always be ready and in fine fiddle to take over from people who succumb to injury or fall foul of the administration. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970407 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sports conference; will it benefit the country? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lateef Jafri MR Mushahid Husain was a noted home and international affairs analyst before he decided to take to the unchartered field of politics and now he sits on the treasury benches of the upper house of Parliament. Sports was outside his chosen environ but the new government thought that a neutral person would objectively study and assess the malaise that afflicts the many disciplines in which the country had a pre-eminent status some years ago. Having considerable liaison with the national Press his main portfolio is supposed to be media development but with other departments sports too came to his lot to put it back on the right course. The Adviser, having the status of a Federal Minister, decided to meet sports personages to evaluate the progress and decadence in various areas of recreational activities. However, his initial step of meeting the officials who, to a considerable extent, are responsible for harming many sporting segments, was not taken as a good beginning by several right- thinking people, particularly the veterans of the games. Why should he take notes from an administrator in Islamabad, who is blamed for playing a role in spoiling sports and enjoying joy rides as radio and TV commentator. Such persons will naturally present a blinkered picture to the top representative of the government. Similarly in Lahore a visit to the headquarters of cricket and a conversation with the Chief Executive of the board may not have proved helpful, howsoever the former Test star may have been cogent in the reminiscences of his playing days. Is Majid Khan carrying out his assignment in a fair manner, ask the fans of the game? Is he taking the game forward or backward? Is the great nursery of cricket, having one of the largest and finest grounds and stadia in Asia, being ignored or not? All the domestic cricket finals are being switched to other centres, instead of the National Stadium of Karachi. Has not injustice been done to numberless cricketers of the southern zone and they have been dislodged from their slots in the national squad? When the National Stadium's right to stage international matches will be restored? Why small issues are being magnified to drive famed cricketers out of the national mainstream? Why is the issue of bribery and match-fixing not being seriously taken note of and show cause notices being given to cricketers? Certainly the cricket supremo will not candidly admit his failings and faults and will try to shield himself when a cricket-knowing Prime Minister is at the helm of affairs of the country. Mr Mushahid Husain wants to shape a policy for the development of sports and for getting rid of a feeling of pessimism in sporting circles. The monopolists from the associations and federations have to make way for honest and energetic workers. The deserving players have to get their rightful place in the national sets, be it cricket, hockey, football, athletics, swimming, badminton, tennis and table tennis. The finances have to be audited and vetted. Sports activities have to be initiated in the neglected areas of the country. For bunching together proper ideas and then thrashing out a sports policy a conference representing famed personalities, management officials, commentators and scribes was a priority. This should have been held purely under the aegis of the Federal Government for it is the latter which has to take a decision and formulate a sports policy for the first time in the history of the country. Regrettably, the forum was hijacked by a self-styled organisation of the sports journalists with their own angles and opinions concerning sports. What is more, the association, with limited membership, was allowed to form the list of invitees, some of whom had questionable credentials. Mr Mushahid Husain as also the conference had to pursue a heavy agenda. Mr Mushahid Husain would have got the right suggestion if he would have invited genuine sports writers through the newspapers. Certainly a policy to put sports back on the rails, to curb foreign joy-rides, to remove exploiters from sporting organisations and to reform administrative apparatuses and improve and enhance recreational activities throughout the country cannot be shaped with the ideas coming forth from the gathering present at the sumptuous venue in Islamabad. The persons will more conceal things which will not help the Government in its genuine and honest initiative. One finds from the reports emanating from the federal capital that more conferences, especially in the provincial centres, have been planned by the new government to get a full view of the sports situation in the country before the structure and parameters of a policy are worked out and enforced in the form of an Act of Parliament. One expects the ministry handling sports to invite true and legitimate representatives of newspapers and honest veterans of various games to future meetings so that the Adviser is not dodged and misled by a mafia trying to damage sports for a considerably long time. It seems that the Adviser, having taken up the task of streamlining the sporting setups in a spirit of challenge, has already moved up some steps to clamp a ban on foreign travels. A list is reportedly being prepared of persons undertaking trips for no good to sporting disciplines. One of decisions taken at the Islamabad caucus was to set up a national task force to implement the measures at which consensus is reached at future moots. Will the panel be composed of honest persons to carry out an assignment given to it or will it put into cold storage matters for immediate action? One finds that in line with the idea of convoking conferences a permanent advisory committee has to be established to monitor sports activities and to evaluate the progress or the process of decline in any sector or discipline. Who will be the members of the committee? Will they be right- thinking and honest persons wanting to improve and reform the games or will they be the exploiters to harm the cause of the country? Perhaps the committee will be asked to recast the associations and federations so that lethargic and dishonest persons are removed from them and all games may look up and march forward. Perhaps the Adviser feels that democratic structures may help the cause of sports in the days of democratic institutions in the country. No clear-cut picture has yet emerged of democratic organisations. Will democracy start from the grass- root level and lead up to the higher echelons of the administrative organs? Will the process of appointing the top officials by the government come to an end, especially because most of the disciplines are Olympic ones, where government interference is strictly banned?. Cricket will be a problem since it has its own constitution and three top officials are appointees of the President of the State. Will the cricket board constitution go through the necessary changes and election methods will be used for choosing its administrative setup as is the procedure in other cricket-playing countries. The idea of extending the facilities of the games to rural or neglected areas appears good on paper though one cannot but have his reservations because the whole scheme may become a victim of mismanagement and the capital invested may go down the drain. If the plan is properly run many- sided benefits may accrue to the nation. Similarly encouraging and enhancing sports activities in schools will lead to considerable gains to the country and many talented boys and girls may be prepared for national and international competitions right from an early age. The sports fans have pinned their hopes on the Adviser who may have his own long-term strategy to see that wretched days in sports are ended, not in a brusque way but in an ordered fashion. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 970408 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Jansher bags British Open title for 6th time in a row ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dicky Rutnagur CARDIFF, April 7: Jansher Khan extended his run of wins in the British Open Squash Championships to six and Pakistan's monopoly of the title to 16 years by beating Peter Nicol, of Scotland, 17-15, 9-15, 15-12, 8-15, 15-8, in a dour, 126-minute final last night. Jansher attaches immense importance to winning the first game and the cushion of a 2-1 lead in games. These objectives he achieved, despite having started the match very nervously. The first game occupied 25 minutes. hitting three winners in a row, Jansher established a seemingly unassailable lead - 13-9. But the gap had been narrowed down to two when he first served for the game. He hit the tin on his first game point. On his second he gambled on a winner with his return of service. That shot too went down. The first of the three points of setting went to Nicol on a penalty. The next rally ended with a penalty point to Jansher, who took the remaining two points with a volleyed kill and a volley-drop. Nicol, surer on his shot game than Jansher, took the second game comfortably. The third stood in the balance until 8-all. But then Jansher worked Nicol very hard and winning five points in a row, forged a lead that stood him in good stead. Jansher looked tired in the fourth game and five of the last six points Nicol won to capture the game were gained from Jansher's errors. However, Nicol returned the compliment - at least in part - the start of the decider to send him 4-1 up. But then three penalty points in a span of four rallies put Nicol 6-4 ahead. Tension mounted as the game developed and pushing and barging increased. The last time Nicol led was at 7-6. Jansher now began to assert himself and moved ahead, but the gap was still a mere two points until a return by Nicol flew out of the court to put Jansher 11-8 in front. Two winners gave the Pakistani a clear lead and Nicol's failure to keep a backhand drop above the tin put him on match point. A drive to Nicol's backhand corner was magnificently dug out, but the court lay wide open and Jansher delivered the coup de grace with another imperious backhander. Back to the top.

Dawn page