-------------------------------------------------------------------

DAWN WIRE SERVICE

------------------------------------------------------------------- Week Ending : 11 January, 1996 Issue : 02/02 -------------------------------------------------------------------
Contents | National News | Business & Economy | Editorials and Features | Sports
The DAWN Wire Service (DWS) is a free weekly news-service from Pakistan's largest English language newspaper, the daily DAWN. DWS offers news, analysis and features of particular interest to the Pakistani Community on the Internet. Extracts from DWS can be used provided that this entire header is included at the beginning of each extract. We encourage comments & suggestions. We can be reached at: e-mail dws@dawn.khi.erum.com.pk dws%dawn%khi@sdnpk.undp.org fax +92(21) 568-3188 & 568-3801 mail Pakistan Herald Publications (Pvt.) Limited DAWN Group of Newspapers Haroon House, Karachi 74400, Pakistan TO START RECEIVING DWS FREE EVERY WEEK, JUST SEND US YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS! (c) Pakistan Herald Publications (Pvt.) Ltd., Pakistan - 1996


CONTENTS


-------------------------

NATIONAL NEWS

Karachi Carnage ..........Two PPP leaders among seven shot dead ..........Victims father had already moved SHC for his release ..........MQM detainees not being brought to court ..........MQM strike paralyses city life ..........MQM chief demands case against rangers Ruling Party ..........Govt for independent judiciary, says PM Death in custody ..........MQM worker dies in CIA custody ..........Probe demanded into death in custody ..........HR bodies urged to probe MQM mens torture Sanghar by-election fever ..........Election fever grips Sanghar ..........MQM to back PML candidate in by-election ..........Benazir has violated PPP manifesto, says Khaliq ..........Mohajirs cant betray Pakistan: Ishtiaq ..........Dero confident, Qureshi fears dhandli all eyes on Sanghar ..........Mob attacks Nawazs motorcade ..........Ghous alleges attempt on Nawazs life ..........Altaf flays attack on Nawaz ..........Opposition calls for presidents intervention ..........Rabbani refutes allegations ..........PML wants probe by SC judge ..........PPP accuses PML of attack Bomb explosion aboard a bus ..........25 critically hurt: Bomb blast abroad KTC bus kills seven ..........Shah visits injured in hospital ..........Leaders condemn blast Pakistan to launch second experimental satellite Release of loan: IMF asks Islamabad to meet criteria for performance General Abbasi says he was tortured PIA defends stand on Delhi flight FO rebuts terrorism charges: India fomenting Sindh violence Nawaz and Altaf agree on common approach Nawaz, Altaf agree on change of government Nasim blasts govt for wrong policies Pakistan was informed about Indian N-test plan Cabinet okays construction of Rs600m monument Ban on mobile phones, pagers to continue Newspaper office attack condemned Meher blames city violence on joblessness Secretariat strike paralyses Balochistan govt ---------------------------------

BUSINESS & ECONOMY

Nisar asks Leghari to halt privatisation UBL sale put off No reference price fixed for UBL: inform PC chief Sale of nationalised units: Provinces demand share in proceeds Korangi fish harbour gets poor response CLA, KSE coordination necessary for market development Alvi for saving tax structure from annihilation CBR surpasses tax collection target Banking on our political paucity Second largest crop protection company launched KSE 100-share index rises by 13 points Improved performance on stock market KSE indices move in opposite direction ---------------------------------------

EDITORIALS & FEATURES

Independence of the judiciary - II Ardeshir Cowasjee Their nostrum for all our ills M Ikram-ul-Haq The singer, not the song Mazdak Indias grand nuclear design. Gen Khalid Mahmud Arif Why fear trading with India ? S.M. Naseem Will India heed the warning ? Editorial Column Vigilance or vendetta ? Omar Kureshi Coping with diabetes Editorial Column The task before the NFC Editorial Column Calculated Terror Editorial Column The MQM - PML intent M.H. Askari -----------

SPORTS

Pakistan, Holland clash in youth hockey final Pakistan beat Holland to lift youth hockey trophy Mudassar gets hundred: Pakistans 7-wkts win over India =================================================================== DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS

NATIONAL NEWS

960111 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Two PPP leaders among seven shot dead ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI: Terrorists gunned down seven people in separate incidents bringing the weeks death toll to 46. An MQM activist, a police constable and two PPP leaders were among those murdered. Seven vehicles were also set ablaze in various parts of the city. A young MQM activist was killed in an alleged encounter in Orangi Extension. The victim was identified as Mohammad Shamim. In another incident a MQM activist Mustafa Kamal, his younger brother and a friend Shamsher Ali Khan were arrested by the rangers during raids in the city. MQM feared for safety of the three and alleged they were given a severe beating soon after their arrest. Two PPP leaders were also murdered and another was wounded when MQM men allegedly dragged them out of their North Karachi houses and sprayed them with bullets. The murder of two local PPP activists was strongly condemned by the provincial government and party leadership which termed it a conspiracy to scuttle peace efforts. The city people also witnessed the Haqiqi activists allegedly setting ablaze five minibuses as their conductors were found charging passengers the newly-approved government fares. Three minibuses were torched in Liaquatabad and one each in Nazimabad and Korangi. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Victims father had already moved SHC for his release ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 4: Nineteen days before his sons death in what the police said was an encounter, the father of an MQM activist had filed a petition in the Sindh High Court, seeking the release of his son, who he claimed, was in the illegal custody of rangers and police. Mohammad Nasim alias Charya, an MQM worker, died in an encounter with rangers in Gharibabad on Jan 2. Three other party workers also died with him. The police claimed that all the four had been allegedly involved in the kidnapping and killing of four army and police personnel in the early morning of Jan 1 and were allegedly members of an MQM militant group headed by Naeem Sherri. But father Haji Ahmed Din, claimed that on Dec. 14 he filed a petition in the Sindh High Court, seeking the release of his son from the illegal custody of rangers and police. Mohammad Nasim, the family claimed had been arrested on Dec. 11. The family claimed that rangers had arrested Nasim along with two other MQM workers  Syed Nasir Ali alias Bilal and Aneesuddin. It claimed that the rangers had killed Syed Nasir Ali on the same day and arrested Nasim and Aneesuddin. However, on that day, the police claimed that a terrorist, Nasir Ali, was killed during a gunbattle with rangers. Ranger Khalid Mehmood, they claimed, was also wounded. A pistol and some bullets were found on him. The police did not mention the arrest of anyone and had claimed that Nasirs companion escaped from the scene. On Thursday, a family member showed Dawn the copy of a petition (No 2445 of 1995) which was filed in the Sindh High Court mentioning the circumstances in which Nasim was arrested. The family of Aneesuddin who was also arrested along with Nasim also filed a similar petition (No 2442 of 1995) in the Sindh High Court praying for his release. A couple of days back, the Garden police admitted that they had arrested Aneesuddin after an encounter in the area. After the petition, the court issued notices to the advocate-general and other concerned authorities on December 18 and fixed the hearing date on Jan 15. But in the morning of Jan 2, Haji Ahmed Din learnt through newspapers that his son had been killed along with three other MQM workers while fighting with rangers in Gharibabad during a house-to-house search. The operation was launched a day after police had found the bodies of four army and police personnel who were kidnapped and killed in the area. The claims made by the Orangi neighbours of three other MQM activists who died in an encounter with Nasim has further deepened the mystery about the entire encounter. Some of the neighbours contacted by Dawn had claimed that Mohammad Salim, Shabbir and Akram Khan were in rangers custody since December. After the encounter, the rangers did not allow newsmen to visit the spot where the gunbattle had taken place. Even the police were unaware of the actual spot where the encounter had take place. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- MQM detainees not being brought to court ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 4: The MQM has claimed that prison authorities are not bringing opposition leader Dr Farooq Sattar and at least 100 other party workers to courts to face trial. Criticising the government, he alleged that the prison authorities were deliberately not producing MQM workers in courts and urged the judiciary to take notice of it. Dr Sattar, he said, was facing 85 cases but for the last 100 days he had not been produced in court even in a single case. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- MQM strike paralyses city life ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 4: An MQM strike, staged in protest against what it called the extra-judicial murder of four of its workers, paralysed the citys economic and business activities. As a whole, the city remained peaceful except for some stray incidents of violence in which MQM militants exchanged gunfire with rangers and police in Liaquatabad, fired on a circular train and set a private vehicle ablaze. Five people, including two women, were wounded in shooting incidents. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960107 ------------------------------------------------------------------- MQM chief demands case against rangers ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Correspondent LONDON, Jan 6: The MQM leader Altaf Hussain has demanded that the director general of the rangers and other officials responsible for the death of four MQM workers in a recent fake encounter should be charged with their murder and dealt with according to the law. He made this demand to the chief of army staff. Mr Hussain said that there was no doubt that the four man - Naseem, Akram, Saleem and Shabbir - were arrested in December. He alleged that these men were in custody since their arrest by the rangers, and were killed in a faked encounter. This is a clear case of murder the responsibility for which lies with the Prime Minister, the Sindh governor and Chief minister, the interior minister and the rangers. He appealed to the Supreme Court of Pakistan to take cognisance of the crime and register a case against the said persons. The COAS, said Mr Hussain, should take action against the DG of the rangers and other officials responsible for the act. Mr Hussain said it was being claimed by the rangers that these men were involved in the killing on Jan 1 of several officials even though the fact is that they had been under custody since December 11. It is also necessary to investigate who were the real killers of the officials on Jan 1. It is possible, he added, that the killings were the result of some infighting for which MQM workers are being held responsible. He pointed out that the rangers have set up more than two dozen torture cells in Karachi where numerous Mohajirs are detained, tortured, then many are later killed in faked encounters. He said all those under detention have their lives in danger and demanded their immediate release otherwise they would be killed like the four MQM workers who were murdered on January 2. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Govt for independent judiciary, says PM ------------------------------------------------------------------- JACOBABAD, Jan 04,: Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto declared that her government is committed to an independent judiciary. She said the constitution does not provide for the judiciary to amend the law. To amend the law, recourse has to be taken to Parliament. We believe that power cannot be exercised without responsibility and there cannot be responsibility without accountability. The premier stated that in our constitution, the Parliament is the supreme body to make laws. Members of Parliament are accountable in the court of the people. She said Pakistans longest period of Martial Law lasted over nine years from July 05, 1977 to December 29, 1985. Gen. Zia got himself elected as President by a referendum held in December 1984 where barely seven per cent of the people voted. The Premier said elections to National and provincial assemblies were held in early 1985. Again the non-party elections were totally illegal and against the clear cut provisions of the constitution. This unrepresentative and unconstitutional assembly enacted the 8th Amendment moving the country backward to the constitution of 1956 which is the root cause of political instability in the country. She said 8th Amendment permitted the usurper to combine the office of COAS and the President contrary to the provisions of all previous constitutions which provided that the President could not hold any other office of profit. The Amendment also indemnified all cruel and horrible punishments and ratified reactionary laws introduced by Zia. She said that political groups have used in our history, the President, the armed forces and the judiciary to fulfil their own unrepresentative agendas. She said that political stability does not depend on the government alone, political stability depends upon the President, the parliament, the judiciary, the armed forces, the provinces, the opposition and other organs of the State fulfilling their constitutional obligations. Prime Minister Bhutto said that if today there is poverty and backwardness in Pakistan, we must blame all those who violated their constitutional oath, exceeded their constitutional duties and power and sought to do what they were not supposed to do. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- MQM worker dies in CIA custody ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 9: A 35-year-old MQM worker died in the custody of CIA police. The body of Abdul Rasheed, son of Abdul Majid, a resident of Ranchhore Line, was brought to the Jinnah Hospital morgue for post-mortem. Inquiries made by Dawn showed that Rasheed Ahmed, who had been in the custody of CIA police for the last several days, had fallen unconscious on Monday evening owing to excessive torture during interrogation. A CIA police party, posing themselves as his relatives, took him to the Mideast Hospital in Clifton and told doctors that he had met with an accident in his house after a quarrel with his wife. His condition was worsening. He was gasping for breath. We asked his relatives (CIA men) to take him to the Jinnah Hospital as we didnt admit such cases but they insisted on his being treated. Shortly afterwards he died, said a doctor. There were torture marks on his back and he was in a very bad condition when brought to the hospital. His relatives insisted that he had met with an accident in the house but did not tell us of all the details. They said it was a family affair and we should treat him quietly, said another doctor who was on duty in the hospital emergency that night. Despite repeated calls, the concerned CIA Civil Lines staff were not available for their comments. During the first half of the day, the staff were busy attending a high-level meeting. After the meeting, they left their offices to conduct raids in the city and were not available till late Tuesday night. A spokesman for the Karachi police, however, claimed that Abdul Rasheed was arrested on Monday in Ranchhore Line by the CIA police in connection with a murder case and on the same evening his condition had worsened. He said: Sub-Inspector Javed Afridi of CIA Civil Lines Police took him to the Civil Hospital for treatment. After that he was brought back to the CIA Centre where he again complained about anxiety. On his request, he, with his mother and brother Muhammad Shahid, was taken to Mid-East Hospital by ASI Dost Mohammad, ASI Joher Maroff and SI Javed Afridi. There he was diagnosed as suffering from pneumonia and pain in the chest, causing breathing difficulties. At 11:30 pm, he stopped breathing, and the doctors declared him dead. His body was brought to the Jinnah Hospital for post-mortem and further proceedings were made before CIA Magistrate Syed Shabbir Hussain Shah. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Probe demanded into death in custody ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 9: The MQM coordination committee condemned the death in custody of Abdul Rasheed and demanded that the Chief Justice of Sindh High Court institute judicial enquiry into the incident. It said the death of Rashid following alleged torture in the custody of CIA, Civil Lines, had vindicated the MQMs stand and exposed state terrorism. It said the government took no notice when the MQM protested over the death of a prisoner in the Landhi jail last week. The coordination committee also flayed human rights organisations for not playing their role in the case of custodial deaths. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- HR bodies urged to probe MQM mens torture ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 9: Senator Ishtiaq Azhar, convenor, MQM coordination committee, has urged the human rights organisations to send their representatives to investigate the alleged large-scale arrests and torture of MQM activists and supporters in prisons. In a statement, he alleged that in the Karachi Central Jail, which has a capacity of 900 prisoners, over 4000 people, mostly MQM activists, have been dumped in conditions not suitable even for animals. He alleged that hundreds of MQM workers had been shifted to prisons in various other parts of the province where they were allegedly being subjected to torture. He said such a treatment of political activists was abhorring and demanded that such people should be given a fair trial. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960106 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Election fever grips Sanghar ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bhagwandas AS JANUARY 11 approaches, the election activity is gripping the otherwise quiet and remote rural areas of Tando Adam, Shahdadpur and Sinjhoro talukas of the Sanghar district (NA 181 Sanghar II) where people are scheduled to choose their future representative in the National Assembly. Though there are 19 candidates in the run, only four are campaigning and making their presence felt at constituency level and appear to be serious to get the seat, which had fallen vacant after the election petition filed by PPP's Shahnawaz Junejo was accepted and the seat occupied by Jam Mashooq Ali (PML) was declared vacant. Main candidates in the field are: Sen Makhdoom Khaliq-uz-Zaman (PPP- SB), Sen Fida Hussain Dero (PPP), Haji Mohammad Islam Qureshi (PML N), and former MNA Mohammad Usman Khan Noori belonging to the Haji Mohammad Haneef Tayyab group, claiming to have the sympathies of Maulana Shah Ahmad Noorani as well. Currently the Muslim League has suffered a setback after being divided into Pir Pagara and Nawaz Sharif factions, with locals following the dictates from Kingri House, while the settlers looking to Model Town, Lahore. Another big groupthe urban populationthough not in a position to win the seat for its candidate, can certainly influence the results as happened in the 1990 and 1993 elections. But as no candidate has so far been able to win the support of Altaf Hussain, the urban votes remain undecided. The biggest group in the constituency, like anywhere else in the rural areas of Sindh, is that of PPP supporters. Though in some other Sindh constituencies won by the PPP, some of its supporters are feeling let down, as their expectations have not been fulfilled by the party, in this constituency, held by the non-PPP person since 1990, such dissident vote either does not 'exist or is negligible. With Mir Murtaza Bhutto, whose faction of the PPP he is representing, Khaliq is banking on the almost non-existent dissident PPP votes and the Sarwari Jamaat members, some of whom might be undecided or confused between their political or religious leaders. Though Mir Murtaza has reportedly contacted Altaf Hussain and Pir Sibghatullah Shah Rashidi (Pir Pagara's son) to get their support for Makhdoom Khaliq, a clear announcement from both Kingri House and from London is yet to come. In the absence of open support from Altaf Hussain, Makhdoom Khaliq, known for his strong nationalist views, will find it difficult to woo the Urdu-speaking votes. MQM on its part might also find it difficult to support the Makhdoom, but being an opposition candidate goes in his favour and might appeal to the MQM. Former MNA Mohammad Usman Khan Noori, though a resident of the constituency, had been active in the Karachi politics and contested and won his NA seat, with the help of Haji Mohammad Hanif Tayyab group, in the 1985 partyless polls from the city. If the MQM remains undecided he is expected to get a substantial number of the urban votes. Though earlier he had been claiming the backing of Maulana Shah Ahmad Noorani, he could not appear and present Maulana Noorani's letter of nomination, so he could not get the party's symbol. There are over 300,000 voters (167,562 males and 139,102 females) in the constituency and the Election Commission has set up 224 polling stations. Presently it looks quiet difficult that any one candidate will be able to get the support of the MQM, PML (Pagara Group), PML (Nawaz Group). But in our political culture, where ideologies, principles or other such things have become obsolete and are at the bottom of the priority list, anything can happen. However, if any opposition candidate, particularly Makhdoom Khaliq-uz- Zaman, succeeds in getting the support of MQM and Pir Pagara, and Nawaz Sharif also agrees to withdraw his candidate, this otherwise one-sided contest, can turn to be an interesting neck to neck race. But if the present situation continues and MQM and Pir Pagara remain non-committed to anyone it is a smooth sailing for Fida Hussain Dero who, has a clear edge due to his strong financial position. Candidates in the run are: Sen. Makhdoom Khaliq-uz-Zaman (PPP Shaheed Bhutto Group), Sen. Fida Hussain Dero (PPP), Haji Mohammad Islam Qureshi (PML Nawaz), ex-MNA Mohammad Usman Khan Noori (Hanif Tayyab group), and independents Umaid Ali Shah, Pir Noor Mohammad Shah Jillani, Saindad, Syed Juman Shah, Salahuddin Qureshi, Abdul Khaliq Thaheem, Faiz Mohammad Qalander Bux, Lal Bux, Liaquat Ali Shoro, Mohammad ayub Khan, Mohammad Juman, Mohammad Hayat, Mohammad Farooq Baloch and Mukhtiyar Ali. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960107 ------------------------------------------------------------------- MQM to back PML candidate in by-election ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 6: MQM chief Altaf Hussain has announced that his party would support the PML candidate in the forthcoming by-election of Sanghar, according to the provincial acting general secretary of the PML, Mohammad Zahid Rafiq Butt. Mr Butt further claimed that former Sindh minister Jam Mashooq Ali had also announced his support for the PML candidate at a meeting with Nawaz Sharif. Though there are 19 candidates in the run, the main contestants are Fida Mohammad Dero of the PPP; Haji Mohammad Islam Quraishi (PML); Makhdoom Khaliquzzaman (PPP-SB) and a former MNA Mohammad Usman Khan Noori (JUP-Niazi). DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960108 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Benazir has violated PPP manifesto, says Khaliq ------------------------------------------------------------------- Maisoon Hussein THE 249,797 votes of Sanghar constituencya political barometerhave become a focus of national politics, with Benazir Bhutto and Murtaza Bhutto campaigning personally. The pattern to emerge here might well challenge PPPs sole claim of Sindh, and spell the scheme of things to come in the province. Mir Murtaza Bhuttos candidate, Makhdoom Khaliq- uz-zaman, scion of the Pir of Hala, stands confident, riding on a high graph of popularity in view of his sacrifices and loyalties, not being matched by Benazir. But the final strategy of the opposition is yet to be seenwhether it would be a three-pronged contest where PML, PML(F) and MQM will benefit while PPP(SB) will dent the hard- core votes of the ruling party, or a grand alliance of the opposition will emerge in Sindh to make the PPP, which has, till now, returned unopposed in all the by-elections of Sindh, meet its Waterloo. Dawn spoke to Senator Makhdoom Khaliquzzaman, the PPP (SB) candidate in the NA-181 (Sanghar) by-election. Following are excerpts of the interview: Q: How many elections have you contested and won? A: All three. I was elected as member of Sindh Assembly in l977, National Assembly in 1988, and Senate in 1991. I am still the sitting Senator. Q: Why did you resign from the PPP presidentship and central committee membership? A: Mainly because of differences on national and provincial issues: provincial autonomy, division of the province of Sindh and Kalabagh dam. Q: Can you elaborate? A: On Oct. 7, l986, when Benazir and I were on a tour of Sindh, she told me, at Thatta, that Karachi does not belong to the rest of Sindh. That was a shocking blowI felt I could not possibly work under a person who stood for division of Sindh. A month later, on the flight to Abbotabad, she said that she would not abide by the MRDs agreed formula of provincial autonomy, with the Centre having only four subjects. Her words were, Khaliq, how can I let the provinces be independent principalities, while I sit at the Centre without any power. That was the second blow. And then Kalabagh dam. She was equivocal on the issue, and to date, she merely dilly dallies. When three out of four provinces are ruled by the PPP, what consensus is she talking about? Q: What is your position? A: I believe its not necessary to store water upstream. A dam downstream can save water from being wasted into the sea, irrigate Thar and Karachi greenbelt and generate electricity for the rest of the country. But by building the dam upstream, Sindh will be deprived of its legal share of water, and it will become a desert, while a good portion of the NWFP will be inundated. Mr Khar is saying that the Tarbela dam affectees will be settled in Sindh. But why? Is Sindh a dumping ground? Why uproot people? People are not crops to be transplanted. Sindh has enough problems. Q: One understands now why you said goodbye to Benazir, but what made you welcome Murtaza? A: Because of his great struggle to save our founding chairman, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, and his struggle for democracy, against the dictatorial tyranny of Zia-ul-Haq and his progeny. When he arrived here, we had several opportunities to meet and to hold long sessions together. I found him a man with a vision, deeply wedded to the ideals of Shaheed Z. A. Bhutto. He has seasoned himself in the hotbed of superpowers war in Afghanistan and the Middle East politics in Syria. Academically, he is well qualified and has better grades than Benazir at Harvard. Politics for him is not the art of the possible(lotaism), but a science of principles for which his father sacrificed his life. Q: In the past, the PPP has had a walkover in Sindh by- elections ... A: I would request you to call it sarkari Peoples Party. Q: In the past, sarkari Peoples Party has had a walkover in Sindh. What prompted your party to challenge Benazir in Sindh? A: We are challenging the very character of Mohtarmas sarkari Peoples Party. She has left the path of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto by not abiding by the partys manifesto, by abandoning the masses and by surrounding herself with land grabbers, heroin godfathers, financial plunderers, commercial crooks. Most objectionable, the very people who were with Zia during the MRD struggle, and those involved in the hanging of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, those who made references against her, and those who threw obnoxious, concocted pictures of her mother and herself from helicopters in the Punjab are now her partys henchmen. So we have come into the field to restore the original Peoples Party. And this election campaign has already unmasked the true face of Benazir Bhutto. Q: Can you explain the break-up of the power forces in your constituency, and how do you see the alignments in the coming elections? A: We have been in touch with the MQM for a long time, having exchanged views with its members in the Senate. In the present context, we have told the party that we are the only alternative who can sit with them and try to solve the problem of Sindh. Benazir has failed, and no other leadership from any other province, be it Punjab, Sarhad or Balochistan, can have an answer to Sindh. We are prepared to talk on all issues except two: fifth nationality and fifth province. As far as Pir Sahab Pagaro is concerned, we enjoy a good relationship, ever since the return of Murtaza Bhutto. With regards to my election in NA l8l (Sanghar), we also came into contact with each other. I went to Lahore and met Pir Sahab Pagaro myself, and Mir Murtaza Bhutto has met Raja Sain. In fact, Nasir Hussains arrest was part of the rigging because he was the main link between us and Pir Sahab Pagaro and Raja Sain. Q: What are the local issues involved in the election campaign? A: In every constituency in Sindh, a criminal plundering alliance of Sarkari partymen and Patwaris and police has become a curse for the small-time farmer. His fields are starved of water; his cattle lifted, and he is exposed to banditry. His development funds are gobbled up by partymen, and his children are denied basic health and education. He is demeaned and blackmailed everyday in police stations by these party leaders who aid and abet crime. The entire sarkari party has become a party of contractors and commission agents, looting even the Zakat and ushr funds. We have come to liberate the poor from the Partys heavy-handedness and zulm. We will not tolerate these bullies. Q: Even if you win, what difference will one MNA make in the Parliament? A: Thats the propaganda being spread by the sarkari PPP. But this is not Makhdoom Khaliquzzaman going into the National Assembly, but the testing ground of Mir Murtazas l6-year struggle, of Makhdoom Talibul Maulas political stand throughout his political career; it is the movement of Zulfikar Ali Bhuttothe real PPPgoing into the National Assembly, a testing ground of our manifesto, our constitution, and our stand on critical issues. And when we win this election, it will be a message not only for Islamabad, but for the US, Moscow, etc., that the PPP sarkari has lost its hold in its home. Q: How many people originally filed the nomination forms? A: Twenty-one. Two have withdrawn. Q: Why was only your form rejected? A: Because the government feared that they will lose the elections. Thats why they are harassing the three candidates who support me. Without any warrant, without any case, their houses are daily raided, and the electricity to their villages cut offall this, to deter people from supporting me. They fear my victory. But they lost the elections the very day I filed the nomination. Thats why they changed their candidate. Or else why would they do that? Then they came up with some phoney billsof zakat and ushr etc., which I had already paid. I produced the documents before the returning officer. He disqualified me only because the payment was late as I had earlier contested their veracity. Now, how can someone be disqualified for that? If late, you pay the surcharge, which I had done. This is why I salute the tribunal, Justice Agha and Justice Awan of the Sindh High Court, who upheld the appeal. You can well understand the fairness of the government. Even the date of polls has been fixed on the second death anniversary of my father. Q: Are Jam Mashooqs people supporting you? A: Let this be a guessing game for the government. I am optimistic. They will not be favouring sarkari PPP. Earlier when I came into contact with Jam Mashooq Ali, a month ago, he said that if he is not restored by the Supreme Court, he will support me. So I hope he will stand by his word. The MQM, like functional Muslim League, as I said earlier, have not put up any candidates against me. Either they will not vote, or if they do, they will vote for me. Q: What about the murder case filed by the government against you? What is the status of that case? A: They falsely implicated me in Al-Murtaza House, Larkana murder case where two of our workers were fired upon and killed inside Al-Murtaza, under a police siege. The FIR only mentions, somewhere in the middle, that one SHO, not the complainant, spotted me in the crowd. Thats all. On this flimsy basis, they charged me with 302. While the fact is, I had never left Begum Sahiba and others in Al Murtaza House, when they opened fire. Q: What is the role of the major opposition party, Nawaz Sharif? A: I think Mr Nawaz Sharif has been ill-advised to field a candidate in this election. It would not be in the interest of the main opposition in the National Assembly to spoil the vote. I hope that Mr Nawaz Sharif will realise this, so that there is a one-to-one fight between sarkari PPP and me. Q: Do you foresee the Jam Sadiqs action replay by the present government in rigging the polls. If so, what action have you contemplated? A: Worse than Jam Sadiq Ali and Gen Zia-ul-Haqs period. At least Jam Sadiq let the candidates to contest the elections. In this case, the three contesting candidates, Syed Jumman Shah, Kalifo Faiz Mohammad, Mr Jumman Rang, who announced their support for me, have been forced to go into hiding, with the police raiding their homes. We have warned the government of Sindh and the local administration not to stop the people from exercising their constitutional right to cast their votes. The people are emotionally charged, and if any mishap occurs, before or after the elections, then the government will be responsible for the consequences. We will go all our way to give protection to our people. I invite the local, provincial, national and international media to visit and witness the proceedings of the elections, to expose the governments attempts of rigging the elections. I also invite the HRCP and international human rights organisations to see the real face of Benazir. Q: What is at stake in the election in Sindh that even the PM is coming to campaign? A: She knows that she will be losing the seat, so she is coming to put in the last moment effort. In Punjab, sarkari PPP has already lost most by-elections. This election will be a turning point in Sindh. It will provide a meeting ground of all the opposition parties of Pakistan, evolve a new pattern of polls in all future elections in Sindh. It will corrode the very basis of Benazirs power in Sindh. Q: How will the people of Sindh prosper if you win? A: They will prosper in getting rid of Benazir. If I win, it means she has lost in Sindh, and if she loses in Sindh, it means she has lost in Pakistan. So we will get rid of her. By her, I mean all what she stands for: the culture of corruption; bad governance, business bunglings and the decay of institutions. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Mohajirs cant betray Pakistan: Ishtiaq ------------------------------------------------------------------- NAWABSHAH, Jan 9: The convenor of MQM co-ordination committee, Senator Ishtiaq Azhar, has said the MQM would support the PML candidate in Sanghar by-election and he would represent the MQM in the election rally of PML in that area as directed by Altaf Hussain. Ishtiaq Azhar said the operation clean-up in Sindh was started during the government of Nawaz Sharif in 1992 with the approval of the MQM leadership. Mr Azhar said the Mohajir community wanted equal rights for everyone and an end to all kinds of victimisation and acts of suppression which were going on in Sindh. Answering another question, the convenor of MQM coordination committee said if today people stop calling themselves Punjabis, Sindhis, Balochs and Pathans then the Mohajirs would also stop calling themselves Mohajirs. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dero confident, Qureshi fears dhandli : All eyes on Sanghar ------------------------------------------------------------------- Aziz Malik SANGHAR: All eyes are focused on the by-election for (Sanghar) which are only 24 hours away. This is not just another by-election, for the very prestige of the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party, the Shaheed Bhutto group led by Mir Murtaza Bhutto, and Pakistan Muslim League is at stake. No wonder that a galaxy of political leaders had descended on Shahdadpur and Tando Adam and the state machinery in full swing. When this correspondent tried to get in touch with the PPP candidate, Sen Fida Hussain Dero, at his election office in Tando Adam, he found almost the entire Sindh cabinet present there. When Sen Dero was requested to spare some time for Dawn, he said today was the last day for canvassing and he was very busy. He, however, agreed to spare only a few moments in the evening at the bungalow of Atta Mohammad Marri, 38 kilometres away at Berani, after the chief minister and Mr Zardari had left for Karachi. This correspondent then came to Shahdadpur to meet the Pakistan Muslim League candidate, Haji Mohammad Islam Qureshi, and was confronted with a similar situation. FIDA HUSSAIN DERO Sen Dero is an amiable person and is popular in his constituency, including Urdu-speaking people and Punjabi settlers. The reason for his popularity is that although he is one of the biggest landlords of Sanghar district having over 5,000 acres of rich agricultural land, including a 1,400-acre banana orchard. Q. Dero Sahib you are in a strong position. Dont you think the presence of Mr Zardari, the chief minister and a host of ministers has provided a weapon to your rival candidates to cry wolf. A. There is nothing wrong with it. After all I am a PPP candidate and party leaders are bound to work for and support their own candidate. Are not the others doing the same thing? Sindh PML president Syed Ghous Ali Shah is addressing daily corner meetings in support of Mr Islam Qureshi. Similarly, Mir Murtaza Bhutto is also addressing public meetings in support of his party candidate, Makhdoom Khaliquzzaman. As far as Mr Asif Zardari is concerned I had made a special request to him to help me as he enjoys a lot of influence in the area. Q. Have any major groups, parties announced support for you? A. JUI(F) Pir of Naing Sharif, Pir of Ranipur, both groups of Lawari Sharif, Pir of Jhoke Sharif, Sajjada Nasheen Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, former speaker Sindh assembly Atta Mohammad Marri, Akbar Marri and other elders of the Marri tribe, the Sarwari Jamaat, the Sardar of Dahiri tribe, provincial ministers Mir Nadir Magsi, Abdul Salam Thaheem and Jan Mohammad Brohi, and the Rajput, Godra, Jatt, Ansari, Khaskheli and Rind communities have announced their open support for me. Besides, the Pakistan Peoples Party itself has a big vote bank in my constituency. Q. What about Pir Saheb Pagaro? He is maintaining a discreet silence? A. Pir Pagaro is not opposing me and has left his followers to their own choice. This is clear from the fact that Mr Atta Mohammad Marri has announced his open support for me after seeking permission from the Pir Sahib. Q. What about Shahnawaz Junejo? A. Shahnawaz Junejo is a PPP stalwart and he has been addressing my public meetings and will definitely support me. Q. In the past you had also announced your support for Jam Sadiq Ali at the cost of PPP. What have you to say about that? A. I had never supported Jam Sadiq Ali, but because of a tragedy in the family, I had sought permission from Ms Bhutto to lie low for some time. Q. What is your contribution to the PPP? A. I had taken part in the MRD movement of 1983 and 1986 and had been incarcerated for 14 months. Jam Sadiq Ali had also put me in jail for three months. Q. Why did Jam Sadiq Ali put you in jail? A. Because I had contested provincial assembly elections against him when he was the caretaker chief minister of Sindh. My voters were not allowed to cast their votes and, therefore, I had boycotted the elections. Jam Sadiq Ali was so annoyed that he not only put me behind the bars but also bulldozed all the water courses of our family land. Q. How do you claim to enjoy the support of the Sarwari Jamaat when their own Pir  Makhdoom Khaliquzzaman  is contesting the elections? A. The spiritual leader of the Sarwari Jamaat is Makhdoom Mohammad Amin Faheem and he has announced open support for me. So, it goes without saying that his followers will vote for me without any exception. Q. What have you to say about the allegations of Muslim League and PPP(SB) candidates about election malpractices, harassment of their voters and inclusion of 40,000 bogus voters in the voters list? A. No bogus voters have been enrolled and all the allegations being levelled against me are baseless and unfounded. The fact is that they are trying to find some excuse to wriggle out of the contest. Q. What will be the over-all impact of the Mohajir Qaumi Movement support to the PML candidate? A. Not much. It is most surprising that against whom Nawaz Sharif had launched the army operation because of their terrorist activities, are now being wooed by him. Q. What have you done for the development of your constituency as a senator? A. Because of my efforts, 95 villages have been electrified, 46 school buildings have been constructed, the prime minister has released Rs40 million under the Tameer-i-Watan Programme for 10 road schemes, 46 Sui gas schemes have been commissioned  four in Hyderabad district and 42 in Sanghar district  30 PCOs have been established, five roads of one kilometre each have been constructed from the sugar cess fund, underground telephone cables for seven villages are being laid and under the social action board, district council funds and from senators development funds, 70 roads have either been completed or are under construction. I can rightfully claim that these are record development projects in the whole of Pakistan. Q. It is being said that you had only 60 acres of land before you became a senator and now you are one of the biggest land holders in the district? A. It is absolutely wrong. I have not added one single acre to my property after I became a senator. My family owns 5,000 acres and I have a 1,400-acre orchard of banana and I am one of the top growers of sugarcane and cotton. I dont own any factory or any industry. When my father was murdered in 1963, the family had owned only 400 acres, half of which was disposed of by my uncle because of family circumstances. But through our own efforts and hard labour we purchased the rest of the land. Islam Qureshi Mr Qureshi is a new entrant into politics with hardly any political background. He deals in decoration business and is not a very rich person. Q. Have you ever contested any elections before? A. I contested local bodies elections in 1979, 1983 and 1987. Although I lost the first two elections but I had received more votes in 1987 than the other candidates yet I was not declared elected because of dhandhli. Q. What have been your political affiliations? A. I have always been a Muslim Leaguer and for the last 40 years I have been supporting Pir Pagaro. Q. Has any other party announced support for your candidature? A. Many communities like the Qureshi baradri and Rajput baradri have openly announced their support for me and these communities have quite a few votes. I am sure the JUP candidate will also retire in my favour. Besides, the ANP and the disciples of Pir Sahib Pagaro will also support me. Now I also enjoy the support of MQM which would make a world of difference as the MQM has over 30,000 registered voters. In addition, there are over 14,000 votes of Punjabi settlers and all of them will vote for me. Q. Pir Sahib Pagaro, according to press reports, has declined to support the PML candidate? Where does it leave you? A. I have been an ardent supporter of Pir Saheb Pagaro for 40 years and I am hopeful that he will not leave me in the lurch. The followers of Pir Pagaro have also appealed to their spiritual leader to allow them to vote for me. Q. How many registered voters are there in the constituency? A. In the 1993 elections, there were about 260,000 registered voters but now over 40,000 bogus voters have been included by the PPP to ensure the victory of its candidate. Q. Do you apprehend any malpractice? A. Malpractices have already started. Serial numbers in large number of voters lists are missing and no address of the voters is given in the list which speaks volumes for advance rigging. In one case the names of three brothers have been entered in the list and the age of all the three is mentioned as 21 years. The PPP government is doing everything to win the elections as the other name of the PPP is dhandhli. My supporters are being harassed and my election office in Tando Adam has been raided. Only day before yesterday, the PPP candidate had personally threatened Abdul Qadir Dahiri, an elder of the Dahiri community who had left the PPP and joined the PML, with dire consequences if he did not rejoin the PPP. Not only this but even the irrigation water of my supporters in Shahpur Chakar has been stopped which would destroy the wheat crop. Q. Are you satisfied with the outcome of your election campaign? A. Yes, I am fully satisfied as I am pulling more crowds than even Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto herself. When the prime minister addressed an election meeting in Sinjhoro only a few days back, hardly 4,000 people were present whereas over 5,000 people attended my corner meetings. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Mob attacks Nawazs motorcade ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Correspondent HYDERABAD, Jan 9: The motorcade of PML chief Mian Nawaz Sharif was attacked by unidentified men on the National Highway near Hala in which the windscreen of Mr Sharifs Pajero and the windowpanes of half a dozen other vehicles were broken. Mr Sharif escaped unhurt. About a dozen PML leaders and workers, including former Sindh minister Ismail Rahu, were hit by stones and injured. Eyewitnesses told Dawn that Mr Sharif had inaugurated his party office at Hala, the first of any political party in the PPP stronghold, and addressed a sizeable gathering. The police intervened some time later and the convoy proceeded towards Bhitshah where the leader of the opposition offered Fateha. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ghous alleges attempt on Nawazs life ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Correspondent HYDERABAD, Jan 9: Syed Ghous Ali Shah, provincial chief of Pakistan Muslim League, and other party leaders have alleged that a murderous attack was made on the life of the leader of opposition and former prime minister, Mian Nawaz Sharif, on the National Highway near Hala on Tuesday morning. However, Mr Sharif miraculously escaped unhurt while 12 others were injured. Giving details, he alleged the firing and stoning was done under police protection and from the government vehicles. What sort of democracy is this where a former prime minister and the leader of the opposition is attacked?, Syed Ghous Ali Shah asked. He claimed that the PPP was loosing the Sanghar by-election and therefore it had resorted to third degree tactics to frighten the voters. He alleged that the in-charge of the Sanghar by-election and provincial co-ordinator of the party, Mr Mumtaz Ridh, had also been kidnapped. He regretted that the traditions of Sindh had been violated at Hala and warned the administration that time never remained stationary and things were likely to change. He said the assailants had already been identified by the people and gave their names as Ameer Bux Solangi, Geedro who was a schoolteacher, Khalifo, Ramoon Mallah, Dhani Bux Arbab, Ghulam Ali Khoso and Arbab Mallah. Mr Ghous Ali Shah pledged that the PML will not be cowed down and added that PPP had lost its nerves as it was fast loosing ground in Sindh and a large number of people had joined the PML. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Altaf flays attack on Nawaz ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Correspondent LONDON, Jan 9: The attack near Hala on a procession led by Muslim League leader Mian Nawaz Sharif has been condemned by MQM leader Altaf Hussain who said that the firing by the PPP supporters and attempts to kidnap their rivals was an open and blatant act of state terrorism. The incident demonstrates that the government wants to win the Sanghar parliamentary by-election not through the ballot but by the bullet, he said in a statement. Mr Hussain accused the PPP of adopting heavy handed methods even before the polling day. He accused the party of introducing violence in politics and said whether they are in or out of power the PPP leaders allow the party to work for the elimination of its political rivals. They are again using the state machinery to do the same though the PPP projects itself as a democratic party outside the country. He condemned the use of force to resolve political issues and said that the targeting of political rivals by the PPP government is damaging for democracy and national security. He pointed out that he had warned of this trend when the government started its brutal attacks against the MQM but his warning was not heeded. The attack on Nawaz Sharif, he added, shows that the PPP cannot tolerate any political opposition. He asked for action against those who were involved in the attack and for the suspension of officials who neglected their duty in protecting Mr Sharif. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960111 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Opposition calls for presidents intervention ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bureau Report ISLAMABAD, Jan 10: Accusing the prime minister, her husband and the Sindh chief minister of masterminding an assassination attempt on Mian Nawaz Sharifs life, the opposition has sought the immediate intervention of President Farooq Legahri in this matter of grave national importance. The details of the letter sent to the president by PML secretary general Sartaj Aziz were made public at a joint Press conference by Sartaj Aziz, Iftikhar Gilani and Chaudhry Jafar Iqbal here on Wednesday. Sen Aziz reminded the president that the latest attack on Nawaz in Hala was the third attempt on the life of the leader of the opposition, pointedly noting that after the earlier attempt the president had informed the PML about the setting up of a judicial committee but that so far nothing seemed to have come out of it. He said that the series of attacks did not rule out the possibility of building up a fatal finale. Sen Aziz wanted the president to play his constitutional role by taking cognisance of the governments failings in protecting the leader of the opposition. He went even further to actually charge that the assailants had been brought to the attack venue in police vehicles and that the very fact that the whole incident took place in the presence of police and magistracy and yet no arrests were made, strongly points at the collusion of the police and magistracy in the incident. Replying to a question he said no FIR had been registered so far because the attackers could not be identified so far. He, however, could not explain why an FIR had not been registered against the prime minister, her spouse and the CM even when the opposition had already accused them of orchestrating the attack. Speaking on the occasion both Mr Gilani and Chaudhry Jafar deplored the incident, with Mr Gilani lamenting about the gradual destruction of the democratic norms and institutions in the country. In a related move the opposition has also requisitioned a session of the National Assembly to discuss, among other things, the attempt on the life of the leader of the opposition in Hala, at the behest of Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, Asif Zardari and Abdullah Shah. It is for the first time that the charges of attempted murder against members of the first family comprise the official agenda of a national assembly sitting. The other items include the countrys financial situation, law and order, and the Karachi issue. Sen Aziz has also shot off a letter to the chief election commissioner, apprising him of the details of the attack and also listing a number of other grievances related to the forthcoming by- election in the Sanghar constituency. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960111 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Rabbani refutes allegations ------------------------------------------------------------------- ISLAMABAD, Jan 10: Minister of state for Law and Justice Mian Raza Rabbani refuted oppositions allegations that PPP was involved in an alleged attack on the leader of the opposition during his visit to Hala. Talking to newsmen Mr Rabbani said it was false and incorrect that PPP in any way was involved in an alleged attack at Hala on the opposition leader. Mr Rabbani said that due to his lust for power he was still following the same policy of not condemning terrorism in Sindh, and his refusal to make categorical policy statement on MQMs demand for bifurcation of Sindh could be reasons which infuriated the people of Sindh. Similarly, he said, election campaign was going on peacefully before Mr Sharifs visit to Sanghar and it was only after his arrival that an incident of such nature had taken place. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960111 ------------------------------------------------------------------- PML wants probe by SC judge ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 10: Sindh PML chief Syed Ghous Ali Shah has condemned the attack on the life of the leader of the opposition, Mian Nawaz Sharif, in Hala, and demanded formation of a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge to conduct a probe into the incident. Speaking at a Press conference at Karachi Press Club on Wednesday, he said: It was an act of cowardice by the PPP workers, and the authorities should immediately register an FIR against the persons responsible for the attack, otherwise the PML will approach the court of law. Moreover, the PML would launch a countrywide protest in case the FIR was not registered, judicial inquiry was not ordered, and culprits were not taken to task, the PML leader said. The PML has already provided a list of the names of attackers to the officials concerned, he said. Mr Ghous alleged that the attack was engineered by the PPP government, with the collusion of local administration and police, when it realised that Mian Nawaz Sharifs popularity graph was going up in Sindh and PPP candidate was going to suffer a defeat in Sanghar by- election. He accused the PPP of pursuing a policy of intimidation and harassment. Such undemocratic actions were a part of PPP culture, he said, adding, we are still determined to thwart the PPP designs. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- PPP accuses PML of attack ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Correspondent HYDERABAD, Jan 9: The in charge of divisional information cell Pakistan Peoples Party, Hyderabad, Dr Tahseen Shaikh at a hurriedly called Press conference at Magsi house and accused the leader of the opposition Mr Mohammad Nawaz Sharif and other PML leaders, including Shah Mohammad Shah, of attack on PPP workers at Hala resulting in injuries to many of them. He said the entire election campaign of all the candidates for Sanghar by-elections was going on very smoothly and no untoward incident had taken place before the arrival of Nawaz Sharif. He wondered why Nawaz Sharif had not come to Hala according to his scheduled programme. He termed the attack on PPP workers as a conspiracy by the anti-PPP forces with a view to sabotaging the election process. He claimed that Hala was the PPP fort and all the residents of the town were PPP supporters. He said the PML had staged a drama to blame PPP of election malpractice. Speaking on the occasion the general secretary of PPP Hala taluka, Dr Bilal, said that an audio cassette of Benazir Bhutto was being played at a video shop when the PML supporters resorted to indiscriminate firing and attacked PPP workers. He alleged that PML and MQM supporters had chalked objectionable slogans on the walls of PPP workers and added that goonda elements had been brought from Badin and other parts of interior Sindh by the PML. He alleged that Zaman Shah, the brother of PML leader, Shah Mohammad Shah, Ghulam Mohammad Korejo and others had come to video shop and threatened to destroy the flags of PPP under the orders of Nawaz Sharif, Ghous Ali Shah, Shah Mohammad Shah and others. He alleged that Zaman Shah and Ghulam Mohammad were criminals and involved in kidnapping and dacoity cases. He said as a result of attack six persons namely Ghulam Akbar Bhutto, Ramzan Mallah, Lakha Dino Korai, Ayub Abbasi, Dr Fareed Memon and Manzoor Memon were injured while some others had been admitted to Saeedabad and other hospitals. The above injured were present at the Press conference and wearing bandages. Dr Bilal disclosed that an FIR had been registered against Nawaz Sharif, Zaman Shah and others at Hala police station. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960108 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 critically hurt : Bomb blast aboard KTC bus kills seven ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ghulam Hasnain KARACHI, Jan 7: At least seven passengers were killed and 35 others wounded  25 of them critically  when a powerful bomb blew up a jam- packed bus on the main Shahrea- Faisal during evening rush hours. The explosion in a passenger bus  the first of its kind in Karachi  added a new dimension to the on-going terrorism in the megalopolis. There was fire and smoke. Inside the bus there were several mangled bodies burning. Many people in a semi-nude condition were lying on the road, crying and shouting for help. Some had lost their limbs. Many had their legs and feet badly smashed, driver Ghulam Dastagir Qureshi of Edhi, who was among the first few to reach the spot, said. All of the wounded received burn wounds ranging from 15 to 80 per cent. Many had their flesh ripped off. Wounded passengers ordeal was compounded when they were brought to Jinnah Hospital which was in a mess and totally unable to tackle a tragedy of such magnitude. There were only a few doctors and nurses to look after the wounded brought by Edhi ambulances and vehicles of some other organisations. Doctors immediately ran out of a small stock of general medicine they had with them and many wounded passengers were then put on empty hospital beds, endlessly waiting for proper treatment. Several senior government officials were present but none of them seemed to take notice that the hospital was without any medicines or life saving drugs. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960108 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Shah visits injured in hospital ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 7: Sindh Chief Minister Syed Abdullah Shah condemned the bomb blast incident and said the elements who wanted to spread chaos and disturb peace in Pakistan, especially in Karachi, were behind it. The Chief Minister, who visited Jinnah Hospital to ensure that proper medical aid was given to the victims. The provincial chief minister asked about the welfare of the injured brought to the hospital. He further said the incident was a conspiracy by enemies of the poor and the country since it were generally the poor who travelled by bus. The chief minister on the occasion consoled the relatives of the blast victims and asked them to bear that tragedy with courage. He assured them that those found responsible for it would be given due punishment. He also declares that the government will pay compensation for deaths and injuries in accordance with the rules. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960108 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Leaders condemn blast ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Correspondent LONDON, Jan 7: The MQM leader Altaf Hussain has expressed deep regrets over the death of several people in a bomb explosion in a public bus in Karachi and described it as the worst form of terrorism. He said this incident is a clear example of the Governments incompetence and failure in safeguarding the life and property of ordinary citizens. He said the present Government has no justification for continuing to rule even for another day. Mr Hussain said that the resources of the Government and its agencies were being used to crush its political opponents. These agencies are used to lay siege of Mohajir localities to eliminate them while terrorists and saboteurs have been freedom to operate as they wish. Huge state resources are spent on guarding the President, the Prime Minister, ministers and their families but ordinary taxpayers find themselves helpless against terrorism. The Government, he added, cannot cover up its incompetence by blaming others for the mishaps in the country. He said the present Government has not given anything else to the people except corruption, terrorism and inflation. He called on the President to order the payment of compensation to the injured and the relatives of the dead, and held the interior minister and the Sindh Government responsible for it. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960108 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pakistan to launch second experimental satellite ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashraf Mumtaz LAHORE, Jan 7: Pakistan will complete its second experimental satellite, Badr -II, by the end of the current calendar year. At present, it is holding talks with different countries to have a launching facility, Dawn learnt through official sources. The satellite is being made by the Pakistan Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO). Sources said since Pakistan did not have the launching facility of its own, it was trying to get the facility from other countries at the lowest rates. Pakistan had launched its first such satellite in July 1990 but had lost contact with it only after five weeks. All efforts to restore contact with the missing satellite had failed. However, SUPARCO had achieved valuable data during the period the Badr-I remained in the orbit. Initially, it was expected that the SUPARCO would launch the second satellite during 1993. However, the target could not be achieved because of the difficulties that cropped up. The Badr-II will help Pakistan in the development of low-cost satellites and creation of infrastructure for space qualified system and acquisition of know-how and capability in the field of satellite attitude control. Pakistan, the sources said, would also acquire know-how and technology for earth imaging with the help of some sensors. The second satellite will be an advanced version of the Badr- I. It is expected to weigh 60 kilograms and will be placed in orbit at an altitude of 500 to 800 kilometres. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960109 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Release of loan : IMF asks Islamabad to meet criteria for performance ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ihtashamul Haque ISLAMABAD, Jan 8: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has asked the government to meet the performance criteria of the standby arrangement to qualify for the second tranche of 200 million dollars of the 600 million dollars promised under the agreement. The second tranche was contingent on the strict review of macro economic data by the IMF mission arriving here at the end of this month or early February. Pakistan has been asked to show the fulfilment of various targets set for Dec. 31, 1995 which included lowering of the bank borrowing from Rs55 billion in five months against Rs30 billion for the entire financial year. The Fund had agreed during pre-standby loan talks with the government to enhance the borrowing ceiling to Rs40 billion in the first six months as a concession in the face of a bad revenue collection position. The final target for the entire financial year ending June 30, 1996 would, however, remain Rs 30 billion. The IMF further called for maintaining certain amount of foreign exchange reserves which were now said to be 1.6 billion dollars. The Fund requires that the reserves do not go down beyond one billion dollars at any time during the next half of the financial year and that they must rise to 1.8 billion dollars by June end. Likewise, certain performance has to be shown to reassure that the government was capable of achieving the new GDP growth target of 6 per cent and a budgetary deficit target of 4.6 per cent of the GDP. Sources said that the IMF mission would finalise its recommendations after talks with the government which will then be submitted to the IMF management. And then these recommendations will be forwarded to the Funds Board for final decision. Sources said that expanding the taxation base by the Central Board of Revenue (CBR) would also be one of the important issues to be discussed by the IMF mission with the Pakistani authorities. The CBR has already reduced its annual revenue target to Rs 265 billion from Rs 270 billion which, it is feared would be brought down further in view of the weak recovery position. Press reports alleging doctoring of revenue collection figures would also come up for detailed discussion. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960108 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Gen Abbasi says he was tortured ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bureau Report ISLAMABAD, Jan 7: The leader of the alleged military coup, Maj. Gen Zaheerul Islam Abbasi, has claimed that he was illegally arrested, tortured and is being denied his rights as an army general and as a citizen of Pakistan. The press release maintained, the general was in a unlawful custody, and was denied even his basic rights as a human-being. At one stage he was almost choked to death, the three-member team of lawyers alleged. Gen Abbasi, Brig Mustansar Billah and about 40 other military officers were arrested on Sept 26 on the charge of plotting to storm a corps commanders meeting scheduled to be held on Sept 30 at the general headquarters in Rawalpindi. They were also accused of conspiring to kill the president, the prime minister and some important ministers of the cabinet. The generals defence lawyers also said the federal government authorities had been making public statements, maligning him and accusing him falsely and maliciously of having conspired to wage war against Pakistan, to wipe out the entire top brass of the army and even to kill the prime minister and her husband. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- PIA defends stand on Delhi flight ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 4: The Pakistan International Airlines maintains that it has provided the factual position to the federal anti-corruption committee (FACC) with regard to its June 6 flight on the Islamabad- Delhi-Lahore sector. Charter or extra-sections are aviation terminologys designated to flights that operate out of normal schedule for commercial or operational reasons, the PIA in its reply to the FACC contended. It offered this explanation after the FACC reacted sharply on getting two different versions for a PIA Fokker flight on June 6 that went to New Delhi from Islamabad and returned to Lahore the same day. The Civil Aviation Authority had informed the FACC that it was a flight chartered for the National Power Company. The PIA, however, maintained that it was an extra-section flight, and did not provide any further information. In its recent communication, the PIA informed the FACC that its flight PK2712 operated on the Islamabad-Delhi sector on June 6 and carried Keith Henry, chief executive of the National Power of UK. The flight was chartered on the requirement of foreign ministry, the PIA informed the FACC. The same plane, it said, returned as a ferry flight to Lahore the same day after dropping Mr Henry in Delhi. The airline also informed the FACC that on the return flight there were no passengers on board, nor was there any baggage or cargo. The same aircraft then operated as a normal flight, on the Lahore- Islamabad sector, carrying a full load of passengers. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- FO rebuts terrorism charges India fomenting Sindh violence ------------------------------------------------------------------- Hasan Akhtar ISLAMABAD, Jan 4: A Foreign Office spokesman refuted the assertion of Indian minister of state for external affairs R.L. Bhatia that Pakistan is a terrorist state and declared that if any state deserves to be called a terrorist state, it is India. The spokesman said: India has employed its intelligence agencies to destabilise Pakistan, particularly the province of Sindh where a number of Indian agents have been caught red-handed. He pointed out that Indian forces continued to illegally occupy Jammu and Kashmir and remained engaged in an arms build-up which includes nuclear and missile development as well as extensive purchases from external sources of sophisticated arms and weapons system beyond its legitimate defence needs. When asked whether Pakistan had attempted to get India declared a terrorist state by the United States, the spokesman said Pakistan had remained in constant touch with all its friends including the United States to make it clear as to which country in the region was fomenting terrorism in South Asia. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nawaz and Altaf agree on common approach ------------------------------------------------------------------- Athar Ali LONDON, Jan 4: In their talks, the opposition leader, Mian Mohammad Nawaz Sharif and the MQM chief Mr Altaf Hussain, are said to have decided on a common approach to tackle the situation, particularly in Karachi. Mr Nawaz Sharif later said the removal of the present government was a must, without which the situation in Karachi, and the country as a whole would not improve. But, he emphasised that all democratic and peaceful means would be used to dislodge the government. According to the MQM sources, Mian Nawaz Sharif, who was shown photographs and documents by Mr Altaf Hussain to prove his charges against the law enforcement agencies, assured him that he had and would continue to condemn the atrocities being committed against the Mohajirs, and would inform the Pakistani people about the terrorism for which the government was responsible. About his talks with the MQM leader, Mr Sharif said that they discussed the current political situation with special reference to Karachi. The situation of law and order generally was bad in Pakistan but continuing violence in Karachi has paralysed the most important commercial centre. If the present situation there continues any further Pakistan far from becoming a South Asian Tiger will economically fall behind other countries of the region, he said. The Muslim League leader said it was absolutely essential to try and bring Karachi to normality for the sake of the economic and social well-being of the whole country. He held the government responsible for the deterioration in Karachi. He condemned state terrorism and said the present conditions had largely been created by the government. Answering a question Mr Nawaz Sharif said If forces inimical to Pakistan are exploiting the situation, the opportunity has been provided to them by the government. He said his party in opposition had done all it could, adopting peaceful and lawful means. We dont want to give up the path of peace. But, he warned, that the situation was moving to a point when the nation would be willing to adopt any steps that might be required to save the country. They will have to take their decisions in their own hands, if they find that the politicians have failed to resolve the problems of unemployment, corruption, etc., and have also failed to stop the bloodshed in Karachi. They will be justified in that kind of action. Mr Nawaz Sharif said if it became necessary to conduct extra parliamentary campaign he would do so. But first he wanted to exhaust all the options. We do not want to take the country towards more uncertainty than it faces at present, and want to try every peaceful method. The government, the Muslim League leader said had neither the capacity nor the competence to do anything positive. It does not listen to the opposition with which its relations have been strained. In general, The roads to all corruption, people have come to believe, lead to the door of the Prime Ministers House. There is uncertainty and disillusionment all around them. Rumours or speculation about the fall of the government cause the stock and share prices to rise. This is something peculiar to Pakistan, he said adding that in other countries share prices rose not with the speculation about the fall of the government but if the government was stable. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960106 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nawaz, Altaf agree on change of government ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Correspondent LONDON, Jan 5: Pakistan Muslim League leader Mian Nawaz Sharif and MQM chief Altaf Hussain had a lengthy meeting and came to the conclusion that 'incompetence of the government' was main cause for serious problems facing the country and it was not possible to solve these problems without the change of the Bhutto regime. In a joint statement issued, both leaders agreed that the big loss of life in Karachi and other areas of urban Sindh was due to the 'brutalities and atrocities of the government.' The two leaders pledged to work together for the well-being and prosperity of the country in the belief that the entire nation was looking up to them for getting the country out of the mess. By changing the government, they said, they would ensure the supremacy of fundamental rights and the rule of law. Mr Sharif and Mr Hussain promised that the change of the government would soon occur with the help of the people and it would be ensured that the present rulers do not run away from Pakistan. They would be made to account allegedly for wrecking the country by their exploitation, they said. They asked the bureaucracy not to obey unlawful orders of the government. Anyone indulging in such conduct would be fully held accountable by the next government. They warned the people that if they remained silent or inactive at this juncture, incalculable damage may befall the country. The statement contains a pledge to scrutinise the atrocities committed on the Mohajirs in the urban areas of Sindh and to demand full accountability of those responsible for the present state of affairs. The two leaders committed that they would restore the supremacy of the Constitution, encourage investment and improve the taxation systems together with an improvement in the law and order situation. The joint statement offers a guarantee that the economic and political deprivation of the Mohajir population would be attended to by the state and they would be given justified Constitutional rights. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960107 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nasim blasts govt for wrong policies ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Correspondent PESHAWAR, Jan 6: Begum Nasim Wali Khan, provincial president of Awami National Party, has said that the Pakistan Peoples Party has lost public mandate and political support of its allies due to its pursuing of wrong economic and foreign policies. She said Benazir Bhuttos undemocratic policies had forced her own party workers to raise their voice against leadership. She regretted that people were facing lack of basic necessities of life, like education, health and food while prime ministers husband was making foreign medical teams available for the treatment of his horses. She declared that ANP would not let PPP and its allies to usurp the rights of the poor and play with the future of the country. She said that insult caused to the peoples mandate by the Peoples Party has no equal in the history of the country. Day is near when Benazir Bhutto will be left in the lurch forever by the people, she warned. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960107 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pakistan was informed about Indian N-test plan ------------------------------------------------------------------- Shaheen Sehbai WASHINGTON, Jan 6: The United States had informed Pakistan about Indian plans to carry out a second nuclear test in Rajhasthan much before the news was broken by New York Times, Dawn learnt. Knowledgeable sources said the US intelligence had picked up the activity at Pokharan and Washington had immediately conveyed its strong views to New Delhi which included a warning and a threat of sanctions. Pakistan was informed by the Clinton administration immediately thereafter but Islamabad was told not to make it an issue as Washington was quietly trying to dissuade India from carrying out the test. Several diplomatic notes were given to New Delhi by the US ambassador Frank Wisner and these clearly stated that a test by India would force the US to invoke the Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Law which imposes instant sanctions. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960109 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Cabinet okays construction of Rs600m monument ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bureau Report ISLAMABAD, Jan 8: The Federal Cabinet approved the construction of a monument in Islamabad in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of Pakistans independence. To be built at a cost of Rs600 million, the monument will have a convention centre, banquet halls, art galleries and a restaurant, information minister Khalid Kharal told reporters at a briefing after the cabinet meeting. The 250-foot high monument will have a 120-seat restaurant at the top with viewing gallery. He said the cabinet decided that to reduce the initial cost, only the monument and the convention centre would be build in the first go and will be completed before the special Islamic summit scheduled to be held in Islamabad in March 1997 in connection with the Golden Jubilee celebrations. Kharal said as the federal capital was short of convention centre it was decided to build a 2,000-seat modern convention centre with the monument. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ban on mobile phones, pagers to continue ------------------------------------------------------------------- Faraz Hashmi ISLAMABAD, Jan 9: The government has decided to extend ban on mobile phones, pagers and paycard phones in Karachi for another six months, sources at the interior ministry told Dawn. The decision to extend the ban was taken by Interior Minister Naseerullah Khan Babar. Intelligence agencies strongly opposed the idea saying that the ban had worked a lot in breaking the communication network of underground terrorist gangs active in Karachi. Mobile phone companies sustaining huge losses on account of the continuing ban on their operations are considering filing cases seeking compensation from the government. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Newspaper office attack condemned ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 9: The Sindh governor, the chief minister and ministers on Tuesday condemned an armed attack on the Karachi office of the Sindhi-language daily Ibrat by hooligans and termed it an attack on the freedom of the Press. In their separate statements, the Karachi Union of Journalists and the Newspaper Editors Council of Pakistan also flayed the attack on Karachi office of the Ibrat. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Meher blames city violence on joblessness ------------------------------------------------------------------- Azizullah Sharif KARACHI, Jan 9: The first Muslim lady mayor of Londons Borough of Waltham Forest, Meher Khan, said that the citys prevailing law and order situation was because of frustration among unemployed youths, urging the government to introduce social security system to overcome the unemployment problem. Ms Khan, advocating the need for creating more job opportunities said though the unemployment problem was now an international issue, there was a need to overcome it by introducing the social security system in Pakistan on Britain pattern. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Secretariat strike paralyses Balochistan govt ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Correspondent QUETTA, Jan 9: The Balochistan government remained paralysed for the third consecutive day as employees of Civil Secretariat refused to call off their strike till acceptance of their demands. Although heavy contingent of police and Balochistan Reserve Police were deployed inside and outside of the secretariat, striking employees were present inside the building and they did not allow any staff member to enter the offices. Due to strike government business was completely paralysed and people who came here from different parts of the province to solve their problems, faced hardship. About 88 employees, including Secretary Services Tribunal, have been arrested during the last three days.

BUSINESS & ECONOMY

960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nisar asks Leghari to halt privatisation ------------------------------------------------------------------- ISLAMABAD, Jan 4: Former federal minister and central leader of Pakistan Muslim League Ch. Nisar Ali Khan has urged President Sardar Farooq Ahmed Khan Leghari to play his due constitutional role in preventing the government from compromising on national financial sovereignty on the pretext of privatising UBL to foreign investors and PTC at throwaway prices. Ch Nisar said that the government had compromised on the foolproof procedure under which a committee under the chairmanship of Governor of State Bank had to prequalify the bidders as well as ensure transparency. But he said, the PPP government had rejected six domestic bidders and got two foreign bidders pre-qualified from a political committee which was headed by chairman privatisation commission Mr Naveed Qamar, a PPP, MNA from Hyderabad. He said all developing countries, during recent Uruguay Round of Talks, unanimously refused to open up their services sector including banks for foreign countries because it would tantamount to giving their financial control in the hands of foreign countries. He said UBL was the second largest Pakistani Bank having 25 highly profitable and foreign exchange earning branches abroad and over 1600 branches in the country and its sale to foreign parties would adversely affect Pakistans interests. Ch Nisar maintained besides fulfilling ulterior motives Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto also wants to prop up her government which is about to collapse financially. He said the government had decided to sell 26 percent share of the PTC and Rs 27 per share to collect just $1.2 billion while the income of PTC met this target amount in just 14 months. To another question he said the PPP government was knocking at the doors of bankruptcy and a loan of $200 million from IMF served as oxygen mask for it. He appealed to all legal, constitutional, and judicial institutions besides the national press to stop the loot. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- UBL sale put off ------------------------------------------------------------------- Faraz Hashmi ISLAMABAD, Jan 4: The Privatisation Commission put off the sale of United Bank Limited till Jan 22 at the request of two bidders selected for final bidding. The Privatisation Commission is taking extra measures to make the deal fully transparent and has decided not to accept bids in advance. Both the sealed bids will be received at the same time and will be opened at a public ceremony where representatives of the bidders as well as national and international Press would be present, said a source at the Commission. The extension of date of final bidding may cause an embarrassment to the government. In case both the bids are not acceptable to the Commission, it will delay the sale of the bank and the government has already made a commitment to the International Monetary Fund that the bank will be privatised before Jan 31, a source said. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960109 ------------------------------------------------------------------- No reference price fixed for UBL : informs PC chief ------------------------------------------------------------------- Faraz Hashmi ISLAMABAD, Jan 8: The Chairman, Privatisation Commission, Syed Naveed Qamar disclosed that the Commission has fixed no reference price for the United Bank Limited, (UBL) which will be put to hammer on 22nd of the current month. The Commission is maintaining utmost transparency in privatising the bank and the bids will be received and opened at a ceremony open to the press as well, he told a press conference. Refuting the oppositions demand to put off the sale of UBL he said the bank was running into losses and needed induction of the fresh capital, therefore, the government decided to privatise it. Naveed Qamar also brushed aside, the opposition fears that the privatisation of the bank to a foreign investor would be detrimental to the countrys economy. He pointed out that a number of foreign banks, including Faysal Islamic Bank, which is also a bidder of the UBL were already working in the country. Referring to a report of the Standing Committee of the Senate, he said, there was no harm in the foreign investment in the services sector. Country requires foreign investment, and now, when the foreign investment is coming they are raising objections, he said. The Commission, he said, would recall the bids if the Faysal Bank of Bahrain and Saudi Basharahil did not offer reasonable price. He said they would not sell the bank at a low price just to meet the IMF deadline of January 31. Earlier, the final bidding had to take place on January 8 but the two foreign firms, short-listed from a list of eight pre-qualified bidder, asked for more time to complete the due diligence process. The Commission accepted their request and put of the final bidding till January 22. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960107 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sale of nationalised units : Provinces demand share in proceeds ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sabihuddin Ghausi KARACHI, Jan 6: All the four provinces have demanded their share in the privatisation proceeds of the Federal government to get the rupee component of their debts cleared. The Federal government is reported to have realised more than Rs 119 billion so far through the sale of national assets sources closely linked with the working of the National Finance Commission (NFC) estimate. It includes over Rs 74 billion realised in 1995 they said and asserted that provinces have legitimate claim to get their share from the privatisation proceeds. Provinces are also suggesting to Islamabad to trim its huge establishments in respect of those subjects which fall exclusively under the provincial jurisdiction in accordance with the 1973 Constitution. Other demand of the province concerns sharing of Iqra surcharge which Islamabad has been collecting for the last 10 years. It is strange that education is a provincial subject and Federal government has levied Iqra surcharge. Islamabad is collecting this tax and spending it without even consulting the provinces is the view of Sindh officials providing secretarial support to the NFC. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Korangi fish harbour gets poor response ------------------------------------------------------------------- Aamir Shafaat Khan KARACHI, Jan 9: The growing lawlessness at Korangi has delayed the commencement of the operations of multi-million rupees Korangi Fish Harbour where fishermen and private processors are staying away because of the absence of buyers. While the lawlessness has gripped the entire Karachi for the last several months, Korangi has been scene of worst killings which has now started telling on the economic activities and has affected the industrial area as well as the upcoming Korangi Fisheries Harbour. The Harbour was to commence its operations from December 1995 but still gives a deserted look because the fishermen and investors have stayed away as frequent strikes and outbreak of law and order situation in the area has prevented buyers of fish to come there. A massive investment of Rs 903 million involving foreign exchange component of Rs 662.538 million in the Korangi Fisheries Harbour Project appeared to have been wasted because of the deserted looks at the place. Managing Director, KFH, Iqbal Ahmed Turk that the absence of buyers coupled with civic frenzy in Karachi particularly in Korangi area was threatening the financial viability of the project, causing inordinate delay in the Harbour to operate at full thrust, besides dragging feet of the prospective investors, fishermen and buyers. Another decisive deterrent for poor response, he said, was the non- existence of any nationalised or private banks in the Harbour despite sending several communiquis to the National Bank of Pakistan (NBP) and other banks to set up a branch at the Harbour for the businessmen. The KESC, Iqbal Turk added, had also played havoc with the Authority for not supplying 600 KVA of electricity since 1991 and at present the area lighting of the KFH was now entirely dependent on power generators. The Project, Iqbal said, had to complete in 1994-95 but KFH did not get funds amounting to about Rs 100 million for the installation of navigational aids and construction of roads and drainage. Preparations are under way for the completion of the above works by June 1996 after the release of funds, He added. Iqbal Turk was of the view that new registration of trawlers at the Karachi Fish Harbour should now be discouraged so that fishermen could divert their attention towards Korangi Harbour. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- CLA, KSE coordination necessary for market development ------------------------------------------------------------------- KARACHI, Jan 4: Jameel Ahmed Bhutto, member (Securities) Corporate Law Authority (CLA) has said that the objectives of the CLA and the stock exchanges was one and the same we are partners in progress and our mutual coordination is necessary for the market development. President KSE, Mr Arif Habib said the CLA and KSE through their co- ordinated efforts can play and important role for development of capital market. He said the basic emphasis would be on the improvement of corporate behaviour for which a committee had been constituted efforts, and reactivate computerised trading system on a full scale. However, a well thought policy would be presented to the government on various issues relevant to the public offerings, right issues, premium, GDR convertible, etc. He spoke of the problem being faced by the members as a result of the introduction of the settlement system. Due to this process not, only members, foreign investors and financial institutions are facing difficulties in handling settlement and deliveries on day-to-day basis, but the trading activities in all such companies, which are regulated through this process are also at a low level. He said such a process of settlements and deliveries is in operation worldwide, only where a depository system is in operation. Unfortunately this aspect had not been considered by the CLA while introducing this process. He urged the member-CLA to do away with this system immediately. He drew the attention to the proposals to carry out various amendments in listing regulations, which are necessary for the operation of depository and providing certain stringent provisions for regulating the corporate behaviour. He urged to review the decision about the suspension of provincial listing. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Alvi for saving tax structure from annihilation ------------------------------------------------------------------- FAISALABAD, Jan 4: The world economists have expressed their unanimous opinion to eliminate the tax exemption and subsequently decrease the tariff of taxes and duties in order to achieve a sustained economic progress. Elaborating in detail the policy guidelines of the Pakistan government taxation policy, the chairman CBR emphatically said that if we intend to save our tax structure from annihilation, we should evolve a uniform system under which the customs and income tax rates shall have to be reduced, the taxation system be made broad-based and the exemptions of taxes and duties be curtailed to maximum. The chairman CBR said the government is keen to rationalise its taxation policy under which minimum taxes and duties be levied on the people. He said the government has considerably decreased the corporate tax during the last three years to 35 percent in public sector, 45 percent in private sector and 50 percent in the banking sector from existing 60 per cent. Regarding the duty drawback, the chairman CBR revealed that the government has taken a drastic and historic step for the expeditious settlement of the duty drawback cases and issued directions to the commercial banks and institutions to immediately pay the claims to their clients, and later receive it from the government. He said that under this direction, the banks would surely receive the duty drawback amount from the government within six months time, unless any irregularity is traced by the customs authorities in a specific case. The chairman CBR further elaborated that it would be optimum effort of the government not to impose taxes on consumer goods so that the common man is not affected. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- CBR surpasses tax collection target ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nasir Malick ISLAMABAD, Jan 9: The Central Board of Revenue (CBR), has surpassed the tax collection target of Rs 116 billion in the first half of the fiscal 1995/96 beginning July. The CBR chairman told a news conference that the indirect taxes totalled Rs 85.6 billion against a target of Rs 84 billion, and direct taxes stood at Rs 33 billion against a target of Rs 32 billion. He said the main increase had come from customs collection and sales tax on the imported goods. Customs and sales tax on the imported duties increased tremendously to Rs 17.2 billion during November and December. Answering a question, he agreed that the tax collection had picked up after the imposition of 10 per cent regulatory duty and seven per cent devaluation of rupee against the dollar announced by the government. He said the tax collection improved, despite reduced tariffs and income tax. He said the increase was due to the efforts made by his department for bringing more people into the tax net. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960107 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Banking on our political paucity ------------------------------------------------------------------- ISLAMABAD: The World Bank must have a unique relationship with Pakistan. On one hand, its reluctant to give us loans when we really need them, and on the other, it goes out of its way to provide us with a prime minister (albeit of a caretaker kind). But contrary to the common perception, Pakistan has not had a one-way relationship with the WB. We, too, have given back a lot to the bank in the form of brilliant men like Mian Muzaffar Ahmed and also the astute ones like Dr Mahbubul Haq. Ironically however, the present breed of expatriate Pakistanis ensconced in their WB offices would rather emulate Dr Haq in his intelligent use of the WB offices than Mr Ahmed. Shahid Javed Burki, vice president in charge of the banks operations in the Caribbean and Latin American region, is no exception. But there is a reason for the Burkis of the world to look up to Dr Haq who, though having remained a finance minister, held a much lower office in WB than Mr Burki. Not that it stopped Dr Haq from cutting a tall figure for himself back home. Despite getting an opportunity to serve under a despot and to enforce any financial discipline of his preference, the fact remains that Dr Haq simply did not deliver and proved a rather easy adversary for the then rising stars like Ghulam Ishaq Khan and company. Now, well rested and revived for a second round, it has been a chastened and a much wiser Dr Haq to emerge from the vaults of the World Bank. Fully realising the aura surrounding the World Banks name, the doctor made it a deliberate habit of popping up in Pakistan without fail and to expound one financial panacea after another, budget after budget. He was the only former finance minister to claim front page space without even being a major political figure. Not only that; he also kept getting audiences with all those who mattered. This was the first time someone had made an intelligent use of a World Bank title in Pakistan. But then the arrival of Moeen Qureshi took the WB image to new heights. A whole new category of ambition was instantly created and it was only natural for other Pakistani-origin stalwarts of the bank to start dreaming about a similar play of fate in their favour. And this phenomenon does not exist in the minds of chronic cynics alone as betrayed by the nervousness caused recently by the simultaneous arrival of Dr Haq, Mr Burki and a couple of other top level WB officials in Pakistan. Matters even got to a point where newspapers kept openly hinting about the possibility of some major political change in the country and at one stage Mr Burki had to formally deny having come with any secret agenda. The gentleman kept acting surprised and at times even agitated by the attention he was getting but according to close associates, he loved every minute of it. For someone who holds no official folio for the region or Pakistan in particular, Mr Burki interestingly made it a point to discuss Pakistans economics with everyone, including the president. But, according to a very close relative his best piece of conversation took place with the present governments financial wizard, V. A. Jafarey. But first the trivia pertaining to his stay. The same relative confided that the list of callers on the World Bank executive read like the financial and political Whos Who of Pakistan and that he was being treated with a reverence normally reserved for the head of the government or the COAS, and they all knew he could never become the COAS so that leaves only... The remark was deliberately allowed to trail off unfinished and capped by a hearty laughter but apparently the countrys influential didnt view it as a laughing matter. You never know when another Moeen Qureshi could happen! Anyway, coming back to the Burki-Jafarey chit chat. According to the source, Mr Burki reportedly expressed his extreme concern over Pakistans economic situation and revealed to our ace fiscal wizard that according to WBs internal assessment, Pakistans real foreign exchange reserves stood at a peanut US$31 million. But if he expected the white-haired gentleman sitting across him to lose a further shade or two, he was sadly disappointed because Mr Jafarey kept looking at him with a dead pan expression. But you dont become a WB executive if you cant instil the scare of the bank in the hearts of the lesser third-world mortals and so Mr Burki persisted ahead with his doomsday scenario. He supposedly told Mr Jafarey that the bank was now viewing Pakistan on the lines of Mexico where only a last-minute fiscal intervention by the US government and the bank  which of course came in the wake of the acceptance of some of the harshest-ever terms by the Mexican government  saved the country from an absolute financial disaster. Once again, Mr Jafarey appeared totally unruffled. An undaunted Mr Burki then went on to warn the countrys de facto finance minister that when the crunch came, the Pakistan government might not even get as many days as Mexico to prevent an economic ruin. Once again, all that he evoked from Mr Jafarey was a cold, unperturbed stare. Finally Mr Jafarey spoke. In as many words he reportedly told the World Bank hot shot that in the event of a financial crisis he couldnt do a thing even if he wanted to because its impossible for me to get an appointment before two weeks. Even this early appointment, according to him, was a courtesy of two very influential business personalities of the capital. It was Mr Burkis turn to let his jaw drop open in amazement. After all, it does sound a bit ludicrous to believe that in a country where even the minions of the government have an access to the national exchequer, its custodian does not have any to the prime minister. Mr Burki later confided to his close kin either the gentleman was trying to take me for a ride or matters are even worse than I thought they were. Thanks to the Moeen Qureshi precedence, who knows he may be secretly praying for the latter to prove true. Probably the truth wont be known because in all likelihood Mr Jafarey may sound an angry denial about the conversation ever having taken place while Mr Burki would like to reserve this right till his second visit to Pakistan since it could provide some fresh space on the front pages of the national press. The bottom line, however, remains depressingly clear. It speaks volumes about our political paucity when a little media attention on a former cricket star or a second level international banker sends shivers down the weak spines of our so-called statesmen. Sorry, statespersons!. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960109 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Second largest crop protection company launched ------------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Reporter KARACHI, Jan 8: AgrEvo Pakistan with the turnover of over Rs 2 billion, ranks second after Ciba, in crop protection business, with the market share of 12.5 per cent from its own range. Dr Prante disclosed that the AgrEvo Pakistan would also be marketing agrochemicals products of Bayer A G in Pakistan from 1996 onwards, which would lift the company's combined market share to around 20 per cent. The current product range of AgrEvo, he stated, included products for cotton, rice, wheat, pulses and vegetables as well as environmental health insecticides. He stated that the company expects to launch 10 new products in the next 4-5 years, adding, that the R&D department of AgrEvo Pakistan having access to one of the largest Agrochemical Research and Development budget in the world and is continuously involved in exhaustive testing of new and more environmentally sound products under local considerations to ascertain their efficacy and correct dosage. He said, projected turnover of 1 billion DM in this region, by the turn of this century. Dr Prante lamented that the 10 per cent increase in the regulatory duty on agro chemicals, together with the impact of 7 per cent devaluation of Pakistani Rupee, would be burdensome and requested that the government should grant exemption to the crop protection products, just as it did for the fertiliser products. Clear distinction, he emphasised, should also be made between the research based ethical products manufacturers and simple traders. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960109 ------------------------------------------------------------------- KSE 100-share index rises by 13 points ------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce Reporter KARACHI, Jan 8: The Karachi Stock Exchange 100-share index rose 13 points, sending signals among investors that the advent of a bull-run might be imminent on technical grounds. However, the broader market did not perform well as general investors stayed away. The KSE 100-share price index was last quoted at 1,477.30 as compared to 1,464.14 at the last weekend as most of the base shares managed to finish smartly recovered. Bulk of the support remained centred around Hub-Power, and PTC vouchers. Most of the investment shares performed well. Leading among them, notably ICP mutual funds, and leading banks such as Faysal Bank, MCB, Bank of Punjab and Union Bank. Insurance shares rose under the lead of EFU Insurance on news of higher earnings and so did some others including American Life. Textiles shares generally fell though fractionally but leading among them managed to finish fractionally higher. Synthetic shares were actively traded under the lead of Dewan Salman, Dhan fibre and Ibrahim Fibre and so did Cement shares, most active them being Lucky Cement and D.G.Khan Cement. Hub-Power in the energy sector was massively traded on heavy covering purchases and so did some others but leading among them fell under the lead of PSO and Pakistan Oil fields. Honda Atlas came in for active support and led the list of active auto shares followed by Agriautos and Pak-Suzuki Motors. Most of the MNCs in the pharma sector notably ICI Pakistan, Wellcome Pakistan, Searle Pakistan, and Reckitt and Colman rose and so did Engro Chemicals and Brooke Bond and some others but Lever Brothers fell on late selling. PTC vouchers topped the list of most actives, up 65 paisa on 4.598 million shares followed by Hub-Power, up Rs 1.30 on 4.488 million shares, ICI Pakistan, higher Rs 1.30 on 592,200 shares, Lucky Cement, firm 55 paisa on 396,000 shares, Faysal Bank, steady 85 paisa on 390,500 shares, Dhan Fibre, lower 10 paisa on 222,000 shares, Fauji Fertiliser, unchanged on 169,000 shares and Ibrahim Fibre, steady five paisa on 155,500 shares. Trading volume fell to 18 million shares from the previous 22 million shares. There were 366 actives, out of which 173 shares fell, while 112 rose, with 81 holding on to the last levels. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Improved performance on stock market ------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce Reporter KARACHI, Jan 9: Stocks gave improved performance thanks to active follow-up support. The Karachi Stock Exchange index of share prices posted a fresh gain of 11 points at 1,489.60, reflecting the strength of the base shares. The investor bullish mood is also evident from the positive response to the new issues, which are being heavily oversubscribed, they said adding the news that the new floatation of Askari General Insurance was heavily oversubscribed as it received Rs 57 million against its offer of Rs 25 million is a pointer to the future direction of the market. Dividend news from Dadabhoy Leasing, Pakistan Telephone Cables, and First Tawakkal Modaraba, were disappointing and have their toll in their respective counters. But the second interim dividend at the rate of 10 per cent by EFU General Insurance was well-received in the rings as it was quoted further higher. Banks, leasing, investment and most of the ICP mutual funds came in for active short-covering and ended recovered and so did insurance shares, under the lead of Adamjee, EFU, and New Jubilee Insurance. Textile shares generally fell, although fractionally for want of buying support rather than large selling from any quarter. As the Dewan Salman, one of the trend-setters in the synthetic sector was being quoted on spot basis, the activity in Dhan Fibre and Ibrahim Fibre remained modest. Cement and energy shares were traded both ways but some of the leading power shares including Sui Northern, Sui Southern, KESC and PSO finished with good gains. Honda Atlas was actively traded in the auto sector and so did Ciba- Geigy, Reckitt and Colman, Cyanamid Pakistan, Engro Chemicals and some others. Telecard, Bata Pakistan and Tri-Pack Films were other good gainers. But bulk of the two-way activity remained centred around Hub-Power, PTC vouchers, Faysal Bank, ICI Pakistan, Lucky Cement and some others. The most active list was topped by PTC vouchers, off 40 paisa on 8.550 million shares followed by Hub-Power, easy 40 paisa on 5.157 million shares, Lucky cement, up 40 paisa on 1.110 million shares, ICI Pakistan, lower five paisa on 0.755 million shares, Faysal Bank, off 65 paisa on 0.600 million shares, Fauji Fertiliser, up 25 paisa on 227,500 shares, MCB, up 50 paisa on 111,500 shares and Honda Atlas Cars, off 10 paisa on 107,500 shares. There were some other notable deals also. Trading volume rose to 21.676 million shares from the overnight 17.619 million shares thanks to active bouts of buying and selling in pivotal. There were 345 actives, out of which 136 shares rose, while 143 fell with 66 holding on to the last level. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960111 ------------------------------------------------------------------- KSE indices move in opposite direction ------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce Reporter KARACHI, Jan 10: Stocks failed to extend the last two sessions improvement as investors hastened to take profits despite predictions of an extended bull-run. The interesting feature was that both the KSE 100-share index and the all share index moved in opposite direction, a phenomenon reflecting the performance of the broader market. While the former fell 4.89 points at 1,483.82, the latter rose 12.66 points at 834.60 from the previous 821.94. Bulk of the buying and selling was again centred around Hub-Power and PTC vouchers, which together accounted more than a half of the total volume. Both fell fractionally, reflecting that bears have an upper hand after taking profits at the early higher levels. Although minus signs dominated the list, some of the leading shares maintained their upward drive and were marked further higher, major gainers among them being First, second and 4th ICP mutual funds, Silver Insurance, Shell Pakistan, Reckitt and Colman and Lever Brothers, which posted gains ranging from Rs 2 to 5. Other good gainers were led by International Bank, Alico, Sana Industries, Apex Textiles, Crescent Textiles, Nishat Mills, Burshane, PSO, General Tyre and some others rising by one rupee to Rs 1.50. Leading losers were led by Dewan Textiles, Shafiq Textiles, Pakistan Refinery, Quality Steel and United Insurance, falling by Rs 2 to 4. Dewan Salman, which quoted spot remained under pressure and lost another Rs 4 on renewed selling by weakholders. Bata Pakistan, Philips, Exide Pakistan, Abbott Lab, National Motors, Bank of Punjab, MCB, and Adamjee Insurance were other leading losers. The most active list was again topped by PTC vouchers, easy 30 paisa on 7 million shares followed by Hub-Power, easy 10 paisa on 5.550 million shares, Lucky Cement, lower 45 paisa on 1.314 million shares, Faysal Bank, lower five paisa on 0.5 million shares, ICI Pakistan, easy 15 paisa on 0.515 million shares, Sitara Energy, lower 75 paisa on 169,500 shares, PICIC, off 45 paisa on 155,500 shares, LTV Modaraba, down five paisa on 208,000 shares, and Tri-Pack films, up 20 paisa on 199,000 shares. DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts* DAWN FACTS Another first from the DAWN Group of Newspapers --- the people who brought you the first on-line newspaper from Pakistan --- comes DAWN Facts, a new and powerful Fax-on-Demand service, the first service of its kind in Pakistan, giving you access to a range of information and services. Covering all spheres of life, the service arms you with facts to guide you through the maze of life, corporate and private, in Pakistan. With information on the foreign exchange rates, stock market movements, the weather and a complete entertainment guide, DAWN Facts is your one- stop source of information. DAWN Facts is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! DAWN Facts +92(21) 111-777-111 DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts*DAWNFacts* ------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBSCRIBE TO HERALD TODAY ! ------------------------------------------------------------------- Every month the Herald captures the issues, the pace and the action, shaping events across Pakistan's lively, fast-moving current affairs spectrum. Subscribe to Herald and get the whole story. Annual Subscription Rates : Latin America & Caribbean US$ 93 Rs. 2,700 North America & Australasia US$ 93 Rs. 2,700 Africa, East Asia Europe & UK US$ 63 Rs. 1,824 Middle East, Indian Sub-Continent & CAS US$ 63 Rs. 1,824 Please send the following information : Payments (payable to Herald) can be by crossed cheque (for Pakistani Rupees), or by demand draft drawn on a bank in New York, NY (for US Dollars). Name, Postal Address, Telephone, Fax, e-mail address, old subscription number (where applicable). Send payments and subscriber information to : G.M Circulation, The Herald P.O.Box 3740, Karachi, Pakistan We also accept payments through American Express, Visa or Master Card. Allow 45 days for first issue.

EDITORIALS & FEATURES

960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Independence of the Judiciary-II ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ardeshir Cowasjee ATTORNEY-GENERAL Qazi Jameel rang me last week. He does not seem to fully comprehend the responsibility vested in him by his office. Being the first law officer of the land, he has to be, willy-nilly, accepted by the Bar as leader of the profession. He opened up: I read your columns assiduously, never miss one. I countered: And having read them what do you do? He hummed and he hawed. He then came to the point, passionately assuring me that he had nothing to do with the filing of the writ in the Peshawar High Court challenging the appointment of Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah a year and a half after he was appointed. But, said I, I never wrote you had anything to do with it. We must all presume, I suppose, that it was mere coincidence that this writ was filed during the pendancy of the hearing of the 1995 judges case in the Supreme Court. That the petitioner Arif Khan, a member of the Peoples Partys Lawyers Forum, chose that particular point in time to employ a former associate of yours, Barrister Jehanzeb Rahim (whose services he can ill afford) to file a writ citing the CJ as the sole respondent, without joining the federation. No notice was sent to you, the AG. Normal pre-admission procedure was dispensed with and the petition was admitted. Moreover, again coincidentally, at just about the same time, the Competent Authority in Sindh ordered that the home of the CJs daughter be raided and searched and that his government servant son- in-law be arbitrarily suspended. Does the government not seem to be saying: Do what you are told, or else... Then, referring to his absence from Pakistan last month ostensibly to attend a conference on money laundering, thus successfully obtaining an adjournment in the judges case, I reminded the AG that at any given time there are at lest a dozen international conferences going on at Woolloomooroo and other such important centres around the world to which officials can conveniently be despatched. Take Dr Nassim Hassan Shah, our former Chief Justice. When, early in 1994 BBs government did not want him on the Bench in Pakistan, he was sent abroad on a six-week lecture tour to win Kashmir. Now, over to our neighbours, the Indians, and to how they constitutionally appoint their judges. 1981  Autocrat Indiras time. In the Supreme Court of India, Gupta vs The Union of India: The constitutional provision for the appointment of a high court judge in India is similar to that existing in the Constitution of Pakistan. Under Article 217 of the Indian Constitution, a high court judge is to be appointed by the President after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, the governor of the province, and the Chief Justice of the High Court. The question arose as to what was the meaning of the word consultation. Did it merely mean a reference to, and obtaining the views of, the two chief justices, or did it mean something more? By a majority of four to three the court held that: (i) A complete failure to consult the two chief justices was liable to render the appointment unconstitutional. (ii) The consultation must be not merely formal but meaningful and effective. However, the judicial appointment was essentially an executive function and, accordingly, the President, acting in accordance with the advice tendered by the cabinet, could refuse to follow the advice tendered by the chief justices of the concerned high court as well as the Supreme Court. 1993. Democrat Narasimha Raos time. In the Supreme Court of India, Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association vs. Union of India. With the passage of time, informed opinion in India altered, and it was decided that the view taken in Guptas case required reconsideration to further strengthen the concept of judicial independence. A nine- Judge bench was constituted in view of the importance of the matter and the judgements delivered were couched in dramatic and indeed, in certain cases, florid language. One learned judge asked: Whether the present day Solomons Throne (symbolising the majesty of our justice system) is fully supported by the Lions (symbolising the legislature and executive on both sides)? The court, after much anxious deliberation, overruled the judgment in Guptas case and the majority of seven held: (i) That, the proposal for the appointment of a judge, in the case of the Supreme Court, must be initiated by the chief justice of India and in the case of a high court judge, by the chief justice of the high court. (ii) That, in a case in which conflicting views were held by the executive and the judiciary, the opinion of the judiciary symbolised by the view of the Chief Justice of India would have primacy. (iii) That, accordingly, no appointment of a judge either to the high court or to the Supreme Court could be made unless it was in conformity with the opinion of the chief justice of India. (iv) That, the principle of seniority as a matter of healthy convention ought to be followed. The supreme court, in coming to the above conclusions, referred to the earlier applicable sections of the Government of India Act 1935 in which there was no provision for a mandatory consultation with the chief justices prior to a judicial appointment. The view of the court was that Indian Constitution, therefore, provided a deliberate departure from the earlier constitutional position. In Guptas case the court had earlier concluded that the views of the executive should have primacy, a view that was now criticised by holding that the reason given, namely, that the executive was accountable to the people while the judiciary had no such accountability, was an easily exploded myth, a bubble which vanishes on a mere touch. It was pointed out that in practice judicial appointments were never considered in parliament. Thus, the alleged accountability of the executive in such matters was merely theoretical and not actual. It was specifically noted that on the other hand, in actual practice, the Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of the High Court, being responsible for the functioning of the courts, have to face the consequence of any unsuitable appointment which gives rise to criticism levelled by the ever vigilant Bar. The court also took due note of the practice relating to judicial appointments followed in England. There, the Lord Chancellor enjoys a peculiarly high status and judicial appointments are made by the Prime Minister on his advice after following a wide-ranging, although informal, process of consultation. In England it is virtually inconceivable that incompetent men, lacking integrity, would be elevated to the Bench. On one occasion Sir Winston Churchill, while addressing the parliament, observed: The service rendered by judges demand the highest qualities of learning, training and character. These qualities are not to be measured in terms of pounds, shillings and pence according to the quantity of work done. A form of life and conduct far more severe and restricted than that of ordinary people is required from judges and, though unwritten, has been most strictly observed. They are at once privileged and restricted. They have to present a continuous aspect of dignity and conduct. The restraints which judges have to abide by have to be, in the final analysis, essentially self-imposed. In this context, it is worth raising the query as to whether the dignity and independence of judges is enhanced by their attending functions or dinners held by leading dignitaries of the state? Recently, the Prime Minister hosted a lunch for the Sindh High Court judges at the State Guest House. Should our judges not, without any hesitation, refuse such invitations? Although the constitutional provisions in Pakistan are, broadly speaking, similar to those in India, there is one difference. This was introduced in the time of General Zia-ul- Haq. The General sought two objectives: Islamisation of laws; and weakening of judicial independence. Though mutually incompatible, he wanted both. Articles 203-A to 203-J were introduced into the Constitution to provide for the formation of a Federal Shariat Court to decide whether or not the various laws of Pakistan were in accordance with the provisions of Islam. Tucked away in these Articles was a provision for the transfer of high court judges to the Federal Shariat Court, which provided that a judge of a high court who did not accept appointment to the federal Shariat Court shall be deemed to have retired from his office. Chief Justice Nasir Aslam Zahid of the Sindh High Court paid for his independence, and under this provision was moved to the Federal Shariat Court. Chief Justice Mian Mehboob of the Lahore High Court, when transferred to the Shariat Court, refused to go and retired. Why does Benazir feel constrained to exercise her power under the cover of bad laws promulgated under martial law by a man she loathed? Three of our four high courts are presided over by insecure Acting Chief Justices who remain seated at the whim of the government and who can be removed overnight by the simple issuance of a notification. Political opponents are being victimised. Our jails are overflowing; our lives and liberties are endangered. The government has done, and will continue to do, its best to see that one way or another the judges case now being heard in the Supreme Court is indefinitely adjourned. This case is vital to the independence of the judiciary. It is up to all of us, the people, to do what each of us can to ensure that our judiciary gains full independence from our untrustworthy executive. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960105 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Their nostrums for all our ills ------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof M. Ikram-ul-Haq and six other signatories of Pakistan Forum Lahore WE, the undersigned, have been pained to note that a group of six, eminent, retired civil-military officers of the country have recently deemed it fit to address an open letter to the Prime Minister of Pakistan through the Press. This "non-letter" expresses deep concern over the increasing politicisation of public services and corruption rampant in all departments of the government, and highlights the need for the appointment of a Presidential Commission for the restoration of the norms of good governance in the country. The tying of this aide-memoire its pronounced negative slant, its shying away from "the roots of most problems in the past" (military rule) in the country for 24 long years, during which power was concentrated in one hand, accountability to the disenfranchised people was the least, its simplistic solution of all ills in the shape of a Presidential Commission and its ominous refrain that Pakistan may not live into the 21st century, have immeasurably disturbed impartial observers. The letter has been designed to fuel the fire lit by the opposition and certain sections of the Press, which have a vested interest in the creation of conditions leading to a martial law in the country. The opposition leader daily shouts from housetops that 'Benazir's government has dismally failed'; 'the state structure is falling apart'; 'anyone but a Bhutto will be acceptable as Prime Minister and so on. Having totally failed in the National and Provincial Assemblies, despite repeated boycotts, threats of resignations and continuing absenteeism of opposition members, desperate calls for nation-wide strikes, wheeljams and 'deliverance days', instigation of traders for holding back tax payments, direct and indirect appeals to army officers to intervene and set things right, the opposition now cries itself hoarse for mid-term elections, a national government or martial law or presidential form of government. Having recklessly plundered the financial institutions of the state allowed drug smuggling on an unprecedented scale, completely politicised the administration and the judiciary by flooding these vital organs of the government with their political protigis, and indulged in unparalleled "horse-trading" in the assemblies, the opposition appears determined to repeat its performance, by doing all it can to paralyse the democratically constituted government. Most one-man political organisations and religious groups are busy setting up a united front to be counted as third options or pressure groups. Altaf Hussain's Mujib-like 'war of liberation' in Karachi, controlled from abroad and supported by the opposition leader who, in his own ascendant period, set the Mohajirs on the war path, has already harmed the country's solidarity and economic well-being irreparably, and put the simmering Kashmir problem on the back-burner. There are several factors compounding the tense situation, some of which deserve a registration. These are: fratricidal activities of extremist religious sects and ethnic groups; nearly three million Afghan refugees still living in Pakistan, aiding and abetting civil war in Afghanistan, paying Pakistan back by their terrorist activities, drug and arms smuggling sprees, and fomenting fundamentalist religious troubles in the NWFP; unemployment and spiralling cost of living in the country; unbridled powers and clout of feudal lords and Sardars in rural areas; continuous rumour- mongering in the name of the freedom of the Press. Prolonged confrontation between the government and the opposition, surprisingly belonging to identical political poles, politicisation of public services and the deepening morass of corruption, undermining the credibility of the state machinery, and the crescendo of the forebodings of the disintegration of the country, cannot be wished away by any quick fixes like the Presidential Commission proposed by the honourable Six. The situation needs more democracy and not less, an unfettered parliamentary democracy and not an Ayub-Yahya-Zia brand of presidential system. Bureaucratic prescriptions will never give us lasting solutions. Our brief analysis of the situation in Karachi, and the widespread corruption in the country, the two key areas spotlighted in the Open Letter, may be summed up as follows: i) The dialogue initiated by the government with MQM is a far-sighted step which can lead to political reconciliation, on the basis of an agreement to be evolved on the holding of local bodies' election in an atmosphere free of thuggery and terrorisation of the masses, judicious and compassionate review of criminal cases against MQM political activists, grant of legitimate share to the MQM in the provincial and federal governments, fixing of quotas for admissions to educational institutions and for recruitment to the services, and redressal of other legitimate grievances of the aggrieved parties. In order that the crucial negotiations may restart to conclude meaningfully, terrorism of the MQM, orchestrated by Altaf Hussain, must cease. Rocket attacks on the Sindh Secretariat, wanton killings of Punjabis and Pathans in Karachi, daily ambushes of the police, and interminable series of coercive strikes, cannot go side by side with talks with the government, for amicable settlement of issues. The leader of the opposition must strengthen the hands of the government, representing the majority of the people of Sindh, with whom the Mohajirs have to live like brothers. We appeal to Altaf Hussain to pursue the dialogue initiated by the government, earnestly and with a deep sense of urgency. ii) Corruption and politicisation of services bred and promoted by nepotism, favouritism and feudalism, are the ill-begotten children of martial laws in the country, and the bureaucrats are the carriers of this deadly virus subverting the health and existence of our country. Prolonged martial law regimes and the civil-military bureaucracy, are the two fountain-heads of the hydra-headed corruption in this land of the pure. Twenty four years of military dictatorship, based on coercion, fear, and lack of accountability to the people, has distorted and deformed our systems of administration, judiciary, revenue collection, political dispensation, education and moral values, beyond recognition. During military rule, the constitution of the country has been treated as 'a piece of paper'; political wheeling and dealing, and bribery was the main tool for sustaining the government from day to day; and the 'public servants' learnt to behave as servants of the dictator and masters of the people. The feudal class and bureaucracy are the bulwarks and pillars of martial law in the country. All military regimes, run by corruption and brute force, invariably unleash internecine forces coalescing into another martial law, or a loosening of the solidarity of the country, leading to its ultimate break-up. Mistrust of the people and corruption are the twin gifts of the cancer of martial law. The civil-military bureaucracy has been the hot-bed of corruption in our country, right from the days of Ghulam Mohammad to Ghulam Ishaq. Through their perpetual Intrigues, lust for power, accumulation of vast perks and privileges, and collusion with military dictators, colonial powers, and feudal lords, they have reduced Pakistan to a poor non-developing country, after 48 years of its turbulent existence, without taking the blame for it. They are the ones who prevailed upon our military and political rulers to borrow from Western countries and spend beyond our means. Thanks to Mehbubul Haq- Ghulam Ishaq-Sartaj Aziz-Jaffery line-up, controlling our finances, our external debt has shot up from five billion dollars in 1977 to 24 billion dollars in 1995. These debts line the pockets of bureaucrats and politicians, and contribute nothing to the development of the country towards self- reliance. From a foodgrain-exporting country, we have now turned into a foodgram-importing country in the range of Rs 50 billion annually. We are totally dependent on Western countries for our industrial and defence needs. Corruption is also bred by our feudal and Jagirdari system. Illiterate but moneyed elected representatives thrive on drug- smuggling and tax-dodging, with immense susceptibility to political 'horse trading' in the assemblies. Recruitment, even of teachers and clerks on the basis of political patronage and selections, not to speak of the appointments of police inspectors, taxation inspectors, and other functionaries, in complete violation of merit and suitability, amounts to the subversion of the state machinery. This legacy of the martial law regimes, has now been accepted and implemented as an established norm, like the Haj trips at government expense and treatments abroad for high-ups, the two gifts of bribery given by Zia. The favourites of the feudal elected representatives, bureaucrats and party workers-a new elitist and corruption-breeding entity are streaming into government offices at all levels. This mode of corruption must be stopped forthwith. To start with, all appointments and promotions, made from 1977 to 1995, on the basis of political favouritism, bypassing the merit criteria, should be listed, notified and screened. Unless there are exemplary punishments for infringements of rules, and a system of accountability for those who bend and break the rules, political appointees will continue to trickle into different streams. The demand for the appointment of a Presidential Commission assumes that a Presidential system has already been imposed on the country! We are convinced, however, that neither the appointment of a Police Commission, nor that of the proposed 'Presidential Commission', to be manned by individuals commanding national 'credibility and reputation', could restore good governance, efficiency and objectivity in public administration, and the independence of the judiciary, everyone is so enamoured of. Such a step can provide jobs for retired bureaucrats. The present political situation in the country cannot be transformed through technocratic prescriptions offered by M/s Moeen Qureshi, Shahid Javed Burki and Mahbubul Haq, with World Bank credentials, or the six retired civil-military bureaucrats. We firmly hold the view that the remedy of all political ills of the country lies in a viable and transparent parliamentary democratic system, envisioned by the Quaid-i-Azam, and built into the 1973 constitution. We should bear in mind that yet another military take-over, in the name of good governance or Islam, can prove the undoing of the country. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960106 ------------------------------------------------------------------- The singer, not the song ------------------------------------------------------------------- Mazdak AS the government goes through the motions on centre stage, the cheers turn to catcalls and the bouquets to brickbats; but more ominously, the muttering in the wings is growing into a chorus. According to the results of a Gallup poll published recently, 45 percent of the people surveyed in Pakistan think 1996 will be the same or worse than 1995. Compare this with the 10 percent who thought the coming year would be worse than the preceding one ,only half a decade ago. Clearly, disenchantment and disillusionment with those in charge over the last few years are multiplying rapidly. But more significantly, there is increasing concern about the viability of the system, and a debate about the parliamentary versus the presidential forms has now surfaced in the Press. Proponents of the latter argue that the current instability caused by the polarisation between the ruling party and the opposition would not be as marked if a strong president was vested with sweeping executive authority. Indeed, if the chief executive were elected directly, he or she would not be as beholden to parliamentarians and therefore under no pressure to constantly indulge in horse-trading. We would then be spared the spectacle of bloated and expensive federal and provincial cabinets consisting of ministers whose loyalty has been bought with portfolios. I have long argued that simply tinkering with the system is no answer because ultimately, the ruling elites will continue to call the shots. Also, if we are stuck with a constitutionally powerful president who has little regard for the rule of law, there are fewer remedies available to us. Our experience of strong presidents who enjoyed enormous power by virtue of military support has not been salutary. True, the exercise of dictatorial power by generals is not necessarily an apt example of a presidential dispensation, but on principle, the anarchist in me is against the concentration of too much authority in one person. Experience has shown that constitutional checks and balances do not function well in our climate. No doubt, the corruption in the air has a corrosive effect. Institutions like the judiciary and the legislature have been systematically emasculated over the years. The recent decision to appoint a retired 64-year-old civil servant with no experience in audit and accounts as the Auditor-General of Pakistan is an indicator of the government's concern for fiscal discipline. And the reported heavy-handed tactics being used against the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court show the respect this august body now enjoys. The independent Press, despite growing pressures, is the only instrument of public accountability still playing its role. By definition, parliament is supreme in any parliamentary system. Unfortunately more or less the same crooked lot get elected time after time. If this form of government is to perform reasonably well, it is clear that the quality of legislators has to improve significantly but, equally clearly, this is not happening. One reason is that the mainstream parties award tickets to those candidates who can finance their own (expensive) campaigns. But the major cause is the desire of voters to elect a representative who can look after their interests. They are not concerned with his voting record in parliament or, indeed, whether he is honest or not. What the voters expect is that he should have the clout to have a road built to their village, an electricity connection provided or a government job secured. They are not pushed about where he stands on the nuclear issue or whether he attended the debate on Kashmir. In short, a candidate is judged on his executive ability and not his parliamentary skills. Those of us who live in cities would not think of contacting our representatives for anything. Indeed, how many of us even know their names? But the millions who live in villages have no option because the Patwari, SDO or SHO pays no attention to ordinary citizens. So for them, the acid test is whether a candidate is accessible to them after he has been elected, and, secondly, if he is effective in solving their day-to-day problems. In developed democracies, the physical and social infrastructure is largely in place, so parliamentarians can concentrate on their real task of law-making and acting as watching on behalf of the electorate. Here, because of the state's failure to provide the basic necessities, public representatives are under pressure to be on the right side of the government if they are to keep their constituents happy. So while there is the occasional sound and fury in the house, there is a broad consensus between the ruling party and the opposition on keeping the system intact. It is in neither side's interest to rock the boat and when there is a change, it is purely cosmetic, with one lot switching places briefly with the other. While this pragmatic approach by the average voter may go some way to addressing his local problems, it is clearly not geared to raising the abysmally low level of governance. This transformation can only come about by ensuring a better breed of legislators, and this in turn will only happen if and when the major parties screen applications from candidates for ability and integrity, and the Election Commission exercises a tight check on spending limits in election campaigns. But since neither mirade will happen very soon, we are forced to examine other options. The strength of the American presidential form of democracy lies in its concentration of power on the one hand, and its decentralisation by granting tremendous autonomy to the federation states on the other. This balance of power between the centre and the states is ensured by a complex system of checks and balances which has evolved over two hundred years. The French system combines elements of both forms of government, with power divided between the president and the prime minister. However, when push comes to shove, the former calls the shots. But whatever system a nation opts for, ultimately it is the will to work according to the letter and the spirit of the original blueprint that determines its success. If a constitution is twisted out of shape and otherwise undermined by power hungry politicians for whom the rule of law has no meaning, no system in the world can guarantee that the government of the day will function within designed parameters. So the answer lies not in changing the system but the attitude of our ruling classes. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960109 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Indias grand nuclear design ------------------------------------------------------------------- Gen Khalid Mahmud Arif (retd) DECEMBER 1995 report appearing in the New York Times about the US spy satellite observing excessive activity at the nuclear test site at Pokharan put India on the spot by disclosing her clandestine activity. The satellite images alarmed the US that India might be secretly planning either to explode a nuclear device or fine-tune its bomb- making techniques. Highly speculative, cried India and counter-charged that Washington was pressuring it into signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty planned to be negotiated in 1996. India maintains that the CTBT must be linked with a firm timetable for achieving nuclear disarmament universally. Despite the Indian denial, the Asian Age reported that India was set to test-fire at Pokharan surface-to-surface missile Prithvi, capable of carrying conventional and nuclear warheads. Both the reports alarmed Pakistan, a victim of Indias covert sabotage and overt aggression. The testing of a nuclear bomb or its delivery system is designed to promote Indias claim for being accepted as a de facto nuclear-weapon power, the close- ended NPT not withstanding. Prithvi missile, reaching out to most of the economic and military targets in Pakistan, seriously compromises her security and demands a policy of a tit for tat. In the face of such a grave danger, Pakistan may have to forgo the hitherto observed nuclear self-restraint and convert her nuclear capability into a practical reality. Given Indias past behaviour the nuclear blackmail by it is an unacceptable option for Pakistan. The Indian intentions could be: one, testing its first thermo-nuclear weapon design before the CTBT forecloses such a chance for ever; two, testing the nuclear warhead for the Prithvi missile; three, cautioning the world that an external pressure against Indias nuclear-weapon option would be counter-productive; four, diverting the world focus from Indias ongoing and projected nuclear and missile-related weapons and technology acquisition from Russia; five, eroding the NPT and preparing a case for making India its associate member with the rights and obligations exercised by the nuclear-weapon powers; six, bargaining on the CTBT and demanding its pound of flesh; seven, promoting its claim for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council; eight, claiming to be treated at par with China; nine, browbeating its neighbours and dominating South Asia and beyond; ten, showing of chauvinism by Narasimha Rao to gain votes during the coming elections; and eleven, refining Indias nuclear weapons and their delivery systems. Indias decision-makers may opt for a bang if in their perception the resultant world reaction would be muted, India would not be globally isolated and the loss of external goodwill and advantages currently accruing to it would be transitory in nature. Conversely, India could renege under international pressure and/or deny that New Delhi ever had an ulterior nuclear intention. A tailor-made excuse could be that the US had either played its usual dirty tricks with India or the American intelligence had overplayed its hand. In either eventuality Indias immediate purpose  justification to retain its nuclear- weapon capability  is adequately served. The Indian diplomatic and media blitz will henceforth claim, as a quid pro quo, political, economic, technological and diplomatic concessions from its primary wooers. It is a tribute to Indias political charmers that by cashing in on the demise of the Soviet Union they successfully hypnotised the US policy makers to look at South Asia largely through the Indian prism. By opening up its economy to attract foreign investments India is busy shopping in the international weapon bazaar. Massive external investments in the economic sector permit India to divert its internal resources to the rapidly growing defence budget. In addition, the transfer of dual-purpose high-technology to India enables it to update its weapon-systems previously acquired from the Soviet Union at subsidised rates. The economic assistance and the technology transfers from the US amount to destabilising South Asia by arming a known bully. Additionally, India is also acquiring military hardware from Russia and elsewhere. The growth of its military arsenal increases its political arrogance and military appetite. New Delhis intransigence with its neighbours and imperial behaviour are the inevitable results. The convergence of the Indo-US interests in keeping China under pressure is fully exploited by India in promoting its own designs. On the one hand, it claims to settle the age-old Sino-Indian border dispute peacefully and on the other, permits the Dalai Lama living in India to stab China in the back. India has been vociferous against the Chinese nuclear weapon programme in the US policy-influencing and policy-making circles and seeking to equate itself with that country not withstanding the fact that unlike India China is recognised as a nuclear-weapon state. Poverty and power make a dangerous combination. The erstwhile Soviet Union is a recent example. The Indian poverty line going back into its ancient history, is written large in the streets of its cities, towns and villages and on the faces of its population. A gun-wielding hungry person poses a threat to himself and to others. Indias internal conflicts and dissensions are so numerous, so complex and so explosive that at any one time one half of its army is perennially deployed on internal security duties in half a dozen disturbed areas or more. Its neighbours  all of them  have had a bitter taste of its expansionist designs. India does not face any danger from outside but its internal security is a different matter. Therein lies the danger for itself and its neighbours. India can explode or expand. Neither of this possibility may be imminent but the seeds for both exist. The courtship between the recently-westernised India and the newly- Indianised US might have evoked interest in this country without ringing alarm bells if Washington had adopted a fair approach on major South Asian disputes. Its credibility in Pakistan, previously suspect, has nose-dived in recent times. Be it the nuclear issue, the narcotic trade, the human rights violations, terrorism or the Kashmir dispute, the US has shown a visible soft corner for India. While America kept mum on the sale of the Russian military aircraft to India, it bent backwards to convince New Delhi that the return of some repaired Pakistani military hardware to Islamabad would not disturb the regional balance (imbalance?) of power. Likewise, India was rewarded with a security agreement with the US after it test-fired Agni and Prithvi missiles. While the Pressler Amendment unfairly punishes Pakistan, India, no less unfairly, receives security assistance and military cooperation despite its expanding nuclear activity. The US policy statements on Kashmir have encouraged India to talk tough with and threaten Pakistan. The US policy tilt has thus aggravated the security concerns in South Asia. Washington would not be blame-free if there is another conflict in this region. Indian machinations, never hidden from Pakistan, now stand exposed to the world. Having failed to subdue the freedom movement in Kashmir it has launched itself on a Machiavellian path to pursue other options. Its imagination ran so wild that when an epidemic broke out in India, Pakistan was accused of infiltrating infested rats into the affected area. RAW is purposefully vitiating the political climate. The RAW- sponsored operations  the capture of hostages by the so-called Al Faran group and the air-drop of arms in East India  were launched with sinister motives to implicate Pakistan. With India breathing fire, Pakistans quarrelling politicians are doing their business as usual trading accusations among themselves. Therein lies the danger to this country. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960107 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Why fear trading with India? ------------------------------------------------------------------- S.M. Naseem THE debate on opening up trade with India is emotionally charged and motivated mainly by a desire to discredit present or past governments, rather than for analysing the problem on the basis of the merits of the case. Mixing politics with trade is almost as dangerous as mixing religion with politics, which is a legacy from which Pakistan is finding so difficult to recover. If the politics of the country has suffered from the infusion of religious, ethnic and other sectarian elements into it, the economy has also been handicapped by the intrusion of these extraneous elements in making optimal policy choices. Our continued infatuation with the dream of an Islamic economic bloc, whose prospects have always been suspect but whose feasibility becomes increasingly doubtful with the emerging ditente between Israel and the Arabs, has been one of the major reasons why we have failed to take seriously the experience of East Asia, notwithstanding the fact that it comprises two large Muslim countries. Any casual observer of the international scene of the past two decades cannot help being impressed by the fact that countries which have succeeded in invigorating their economies and achieving high rates of economic growth have done so through increased reliance on foreign trade. Moreover, they have done so by diversifying their trade and through increased interaction with countries of their own region. Political differences have also not stood in the way of closer economic ties, especially trade, between nations having a long history of hostile political relations. Besides the well-known example of Europe, which illustrates that economic ties are not only possible between political adversaries but that they also help heal past differences and create common bonds of understanding, many other instances can also be cited. In more recent times bitter enemies of Japan in East Asia (and often of each other), sank their differences and engaged in intensive trade with each other in the larger interests of their peoples well-being. Despite the political posturing between Taiwan and the Peoples Republic of China, a healthy and growing trade and investment relationship between the two economies has flourished. Indeed, one is hard put to find contrary contemporary examples of nations not engaging in trade because of political considerations. Apart from the UN-sanctioned (often US-led trade) embargoes against Iraq, Libya and at one time South Africa, the only remaining vestige of such politically-motivated trade policy is, ironically, being pursued by the US, the leading protagonist of free trade, against Cuba and Iran. But that is clearly a case of paranoia which the US nurses towards its perceived-enemies. With the signing of the PLO-Israel peace agreement, trading relations between the Arab states and Israel are fast developing. It is, therefore, difficult to understand why Pakistan should stand out as the only significant developing country to practise a politically-inspired trade policy, if only against one country. Indeed, there would be some strength in the argument for generalised trade restrictions to enable the country acquire a sufficiently strong industrial base before it launches itself into the uncharted waters of free trade in international competition. Unfortunately, the time for that argument has come and gone and our policy makers have frittered away the opportunities provided to them by the international trading system during successive regimes which promoted their own narrowly- focused, self-serving economic agenda rather than work towards the creation of a viable economic base which could stand international competition. Short of becoming totally isolated from the global economy for a considerable period of time, Pakistan does not now have the option of turning the clock back and attempting to regain the missed opportunities of the past. With the completion of the Uruguay Round and the establishment of the World Trade Organisation, all trading signatories of the Marrakesh declaration are obliged to accord each other MFN treatment and have agreed to reduce their tariff levels significantly over time. Such reduction is intended to greatly increase the volume of trade and result in more mutually beneficial pattern of comparative advantage. While the Marrakesh agreement is heavily tilted in favour of industrialised countries by virtue of their predominant position in world trade, the developing countries have managed to extract, through years of detailed negotiations during the Uruguay Round, the minimal concessions needed for the maintenance of a free trade environment. Another source of increase in international trade as an impetus for growth is the formation of regional cooperation in trade and investment, which has assumed increasing importance in most regions of the world, with the exception of South Asia. While SAARC has been in existence for well over a decade and has carried out some important activities, its achievements so far have been well below its inherent potential. Its main role has so far been in promoting exchange of visits, information and experience  activities, which, while seemingly trivial, can have a substantial value in the promotion of intra-regional cooperation. However, such activities have to be accompanied by greater liberalisation in trade and economic exchanges and, in due course, also by an overall improvement in political relations of cooperating countries. In the absence of the latter provisos, the mere promotion of cultural and professional exchanges could have a negative effect on the perception of people in cooperating countries as waste of resources. It is, therefore, necessary that concerted efforts for economic cooperation are not put off for too long; cosmetic essays in public relations are no substitute for these. The major stumbling block in SAARCs progress as a regional economic cooperation organisation is the poor and worsening state of political relationships between the two largest economies of the SAARC namely, India and Pakistan. Unless there is a significant improvement in this relationship, SAARCs image as a regional economic cooperation grouping will remain lacklustre and its high potential will not materialise. The lack of mutual trust between India and Pakistan affects the overall functioning of the organisation, since, as envisaged in its original charter, decisions at all levels in the organisation have to be taken on the basis of unanimity. Economic cooperation in South Asia has also been inhibited to some extent by the fear among some of the smaller countries in the region that India being the largest economy in the region, is likely to receive a disproportionately high share of any gain accruing from such cooperation. These fears are not without substance, but are often exaggerated by those industries and sectors in the economy which are likely to lose, while the potential beneficiaries, by far the more dynamic elements in the economy, who have been denied patronage and access to resources, have little voice in policy formulation. The main thing to recognise is that while there are likely to be both gainers and losers from increased trade with India and other countries, the country itself is unlikely to be a loser, even if its bilateral trade balance with one or some of the countries worsens and can be dispelled by giving adequate safeguards for any adverse effects caused to the national economy of smaller countries. For unless a country is grossly inefficient, growing trade is an increasing and not a zero-sum game, in which both trading partners can gain. Increased and diversified trade with new trading markets under the MFN or other concessional trade regimes will not give rise to the need for some restructuring of the domestic economy and refashioning of comparative advantage. This is going to be inevitable for Pakistan whose comparative advantage has been frozen since its early nationalisation in the 1950 and 1960s in favour of a few basic and un- specialised commodities. This pattern of comparative advantage is likely to crumble under the weight of more liberalised trade mandated by the Uruguay Round. To try to resist such restructuring on the plea that our industries will be swamped by Indian goods is counter- productive. India does not, after all, have a high competitive edge compared to other countries we will be opening our trade to. Under the pressure of competition, we may acquire a better competitive edge and be forced to develop market niches in other countries, including India, which our industrialists have not had any motivation for doing because of a captive domestic market and assured markets in low quality exports. Despite these fears of smaller countries, SAARC adopted the agreement on SAARC Preferential Trading Arrangement (SAPTA) at the 7th SAARC summit in Dhaka in April 1993. However, it has taken more than two years for its final adoption, with Pakistan being among the last to ratify. Pakistans continued reservations cast doubts on the agreement becoming operational soon. If and when it does become operational, the product-by-product approach in SAPTA is unlikely to make any significant difference to the existing low levels of intra-regional trade which is only three per cent of their total trade. As pointed out in a recent ESCAP study, a bold across-the-board preferential trade agreement on transit and trade to promote intra-SAARC trade is required, which undoubtedly will benefit to all the countries as well as stimulate the economic growth of the region. It is significant that Nepal, a small least developed economy, has beckoned the way by announcing a 10 per cent preferential tariff reduction on all imports from the SAARC region. Similar bold measures, perhaps proportional to the size of each regional economy, could pave the way for a vigorous increase in intra-SAARC trade. By adopting a negative attitude towards the expansion of trade with SAARC in general and India in particular, Pakistan is letting slip a unique opportunity of providing the economic and trade leadership to a region which has a large potential of becoming a dynamic economic force in the next century. Not long ago, India used to be afraid of being ganged up against by the smaller nations in SAARC; Pakistans attitude is likely to dissipate this fear. A much bolder and less diffident strategy on the part of Pakistan could shame India into making larger concessions in SAPTA and in making SAARC a truly dynamic region. The two countries need to engage in an economic and trade competition, instead of the senseless arms race that provides no real security to the people of either country. In this respect, as in many others, SAARC can benefit from the ASEANs experience, which is widely recognised as the most enviable example for conducting regional economic cooperation among geographically contiguous, politically independent nation states of medium size. Among the most important achievements of the ASEAN have been the creation of an economic and political environment in the region under which normal economic relations can take place without a threat of the eruption of an armed conflict among member countries within the region. ASEAN countries played an important role not so much in directly solving but in defusing bilateral conflicts of their members. They perceived regional peace in terms of public good whose existence benefits all member countries and whose absence causes considerable loss of resources that could better be utilised elsewhere. This is a major lesson that SAARC countries, especially its two chief adversaries, could profitably emulate. This public good aspect of regional peace is particularly important in an era when foreign direct investment is playing a major role in the industrialisation and development of developing countries. A major factor influencing multinational firms decisions to undertake foreign investment is the existence of peace and law and order in areas where they invest. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960108 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Will India heed the warning? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Editorial Column WASHINGTON'S warning to India not to persist in its move to conduct yet another nuclear explosion has not come a day too soon. There should not be the slightest doubt that if New Delhi went ahead with its plans, it would trigger a dangerous nuclear arms race in the region, the implications of which are too frightening to contemplate. The United States has reportedly conveyed to New Delhi that if it carried out the planned nuclear test, it would open itself to severe economic and trade sanctions under the 1994 Proliferation Preventive Act, and have assistance from the world finance bodies cut off. The point to note here is that Washington would not have administered a stern warning unless it was fairly convinced, on the basis of evidence, that India was in fact planning to conduct a second nuclear test explosion-after its first in 1974. The message from Washington should be expected to put the Indian government in a sober frame of mind and persuade it to reconsider the active pursuit of its bloated nuclear ambitions. However, since information on the exact nature of Washington's warning continues to be somewhat vague and sketchy, the countries of the region, especially Pakistan, are entitled to be clearly informed of the United States' stand in the matter. The US has kept Islamabad under pressure for years, through the highly discriminatory device of the Pressler law, excluding it from all economic and military assistance. All this while, India has defiantly opposed the signing of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT) and entering into any regional or bilateral (with Pakistan) arrangement to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and missile technology in South Asia. Pakistan, on its part, has repeatedly offered to accept any restrictions on its nuclear development programme which are equally applicable to India. To no one's surprise, there have been reports suggesting that India could be expecting to use veiled threats of reneging on its commitment to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), due some time this year, to drive a bargain for extracting certain concessions for itself. If this is what India is angling for, it would be preposterous to offer any quid pro quo as a "reward", such as a permanent seat on the UN Security Council or possible US assistance in nuclear and space research, merely to ensure India honouring its commitment to non- proliferation. Conduct of international relations would no longer be regarded as reasonably fair and principled if India, or any other country for that matter, is allowed to get away with such blackmailing tactics. Some US officials appear to believe that the warning administered by Washington may have already prompted New Delhi to back off from its proposed nuclear explosion. There is no tangible basis so far for such speculation, however, particularly because it is widely believed that India's prime minister, Narasimha Rao, may be hoping to shore up his sagging popularity ahead of next April's elections by upstaging his main rival, the ultra-nationalistic Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), whose manifesto calls for a full-fledged nuclear weapons programme for India. In this context, it must be stated without the slightest equivocation that Pakistan would under no circumstances knuckle under international pressure and accept a situation in which only India possesses the nuclear weapon, particularly in view of the fact that New Delhi already enjoys a clear edge over Pakistan in regard to conventional weapons. New Delhi knows fully well that its genuine security needs do not call for a nuclear arsenal. In spite of this, if it goes ahead with its planned nuclear test explosion, it would only confirm India's hegemonic ambitions in the region which it wants to prop up by its nuclear might. Should India go ahead with its nuclear test, it will destroy the present, delicate informal nuclear restraint regime in the South Asian region. This in turn could mark the beginning of a perilous nuclear arms race in a region, which, in any case, has been on the brink of military confrontation for some time. If major powers, such as the US, expect their warnings to be taken seriously, they must be prepared to use all the political, diplomatic and economic means at their command to obtain compliance with the needed restraint. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960107 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Vigilance or vendetta? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Omar Kureishi IN other times and days gone by when we were less cynical and not quite as earnest as we have become, the disclosure by a political columnist that four journalists had been picked up by the police in Islamabad for having some cans of beer in their car on New Years Eve would have been considered a premature April Fool joke, a kind of spoof. But I checked it out and it happened for real. I have read the column and though it reeks of sarcasm, an undercurrent of justified indignation runs through it. I agree that it is not funny at all and the incident has all the hallmarks of a set-up, and a pretty clumsy set-up at that. But why should we assume the worst? Why not take the best case scenario. There were beer cans in the car of the journalists and in the jargon of the police it was a fair cop. If that indeed is the case, then the police are deserving of our congratulations. It shows the police to be hawk-eyed vigilant. Thousands of cars ply the roads of Islamabad and yet the police were able to pick a needle from a haystack. Was it luck that they were able to pick up a car that was carrying contraband goods out of thousands of cars or was some high- class sleuthing involved? The law of probabilities is against the police if the check was random, improbable but not impossible. It goes beyond the remarkable and borders on the miraculous. But people do win a lottery against similar odds. Somehow I feel that it did not quite happen this way. And one sincerely hopes that an appropriate probe of the incident will be made, as promised. But the probe must be thorough because an extremely important principle is involved. There is first of all the fundamental rights of individuals and contrary to what many people might think, journalists are not a special breed and they enjoy neither greater nor lesser rights. They cannot or must not be targeted because of the nature of their profession. Freedom of the Press is more than a compact between the government and the media. It goes to the very core of a democratic society for it involves the right of the people to know. It has to be accepted that freedom of the Press means that there will be criticism, that a certain amount of scepticism will be shown to official versions. It is true that freedom of the Press has never meant licence, the right to cry fire in a crowded hall but those who choose to be in the public domain must learn to accept a certain amount of heat. Whether the four journalists who were picked up by the police had indeed cans of beer in their car or whether others scores were being settled is for the probe to decide. The credibility of the police is also involved and the senior officials must ensure that if there has been some hanky-panky then exemplary punishment must follow. Let this be a test case. Who knows it could be a defining moment in re- establishing trust between the police and the public. I have written several columns in which I have made a special point of lamenting the lack of trust between the police and the public. The police are not perceived as friends and the sight of a policeman far from being reassuring is intimidating. This is no way to get a lawful society. But something else is involved. Our country, like many other countries, is in the grip of terrorism, both domestic and international. Only recently we have had the bombing of the Egyptian Embassy in Islamabad and the blast in Peshawar. Both deadly serious in every sense, including literally, and both cowardly in the extreme. Although investigations are going on and there are many theories as to who may have been responsible, it cannot be claimed that the cases have been solved. if track records are anything to go by, we cannot be too optimistic. One must accept that both in the bombing of the Egyptian Embassy and in the blast in Peshawar, the police and other agencies were caught napping. The same must go for acts of terrorism in Karachi. There is no doubt that there is an information failure. Yet we find an almost oppressive police presence in the major cities and motorists and motor-cyclists are stopped and searched almost on a whim. It would not matter if we were getting results but obviously we are not, for there seems to be no end to the violence, certainly in Karachi, and the public feels it is being needlessly harassed. Besides, pitted against professional and highly trained terrorists, these efforts seem amateurish. The fight against terrorism must be based on solid information and our agencies have to be one step ahead. But most of all you have to have the people behind you and not at odds with one another. It is a matter of regret that the political parties have not closed ranks on this single agenda of terrorism. Terrorism is not only a crime against the state, it is a crime against the people of this country. The victims of terrorism are innocent men, women and children. Forty-five precious lives were lost in Peshawar besides scores who were injured. The dead are gone and beyond suffering, in this world at any rate, but those that are left behind must reckon with the consequences, their own lives that have been devastated. Can anyone justify this barbaric act, can anyone say that means justified the ends, that the cause was more just than the right to life of those who lost that right? Nobody can justify murder. Again, there is the perception that a good deal of snooping is going on and Big Brother is watching. Much of this may be imaginary. I do know that many people who consider themselves to be people of consequence are extra careful when talking on the telephone. This is particularly true of Islamabad. Even sitting in the coffee shop of the citys five-star hotel one gets the feeling that one is being watched. It may be nonsense, just a fit of self-importance. But if the agencies are alert, then it is a good thing for it means that they are on the job which is to hold our enemies at bay. The question arises: when it comes to the crunch, like the bombing of the Egyptian Embassy or the blast in Peshawar, all this supposed surveillance doesnt seem to amount to much. Yet we are led to believe that the police are able to nab four journalists who happen to have some cans of beer in their car! Why not this same vigilance against more serious enemies? Find those with bombs in their cars. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960108 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Coping with diabetes ------------------------------------------------------------------- Editorial Column THE warning that diabetes has acquired epidemic proportions in Pakistan needs to be taken seriously. The warning has been sounded by the Secretary-General of the Diabetic Association of Pakistan who was addressing a seminar on management of diabetes, in Karachi. He based his warning on the fact that 12 per cent of the population in the age group of 25 years or above suffered from the debilitating disease. Forty per cent of the people who have been living with the disease for more than 15 years could become incapacitated from complications arising from diabetic conditions and many of them may even die prematurely if not treated or cared for properly. The statistics are indeed fearful as diabetes is yet a disease which cannot be prevented or completely cured; it can only be kept under control, which puts an awesome burden on the patient as well as his family members. Many diabetic patients die of heart complications and 36 per cent of the cases of blindness in Pakistan are attributed to this disorder. Although diabetes is one of the oldest known ailments, our knowledge about it is still very rudimentary. In fact, in developed countries, half of the diabetic patients do not know that they are suffering from the disease. In the under-developed countries four out of every five diabetic patients are ignorant of the nature of the disease they are afflicted with. This lack of knowledge, and the required facilities and services, increases the dangers from diabetes. Therefore to spread knowledge and to make people conversant with the essential do's and don'ts of management and control is imperative. Fortunately efforts are not lacking in Pakistan although a great deal more needs to be done to make people conscious on a wider scale. In spite of the fact that education plays an important role in the prevention and management of diabetes, there are millions in the country whose knowledge about the disease is as scanty as can be imagined. The people have to pay a very high price in impaired health and very many complications and disabilities that emanate from it for this lack of knowledge. Moreover, the absence of adequate health care facilities in the country, especially in the rural areas, make people easy prey to this and a host of other afflictions. The situation can be improved with the spread of education in general and knowledge about diabetes in particular. There is urgent need for the health authorities to pay more attention to this problem and set up the required medical and counselling facilities and services for the benefit of diabetic patients. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960109 ------------------------------------------------------------------- The task before the NFC ------------------------------------------------------------------- Editorial Column THE task of the National Finance Commission (NFC), appointed by the President recently on the expiry of the tenure of the previous one, is infinitely more difficult and complex than what its predecessors ever faced. It is required to allocate very scant revenues between the Centre and the provinces and among the provinces in the face of highly exaggerated expectations. The financial position of the federation and the provinces has reached a stage where even moderate claims tend to outstrip the available resources. The present financial crisis is largely the result of accumulation of huge debts by the federation over the years, so much so that 50 per cent of the federal revenues are gobbled up by debt servicing. Provincial finances are also under severe strain for two reasons. First, provinces have for long been very niggardly towards education, health and maintenance of assets, with the result that the demands of these have now become too pressing to be ignored or postponed any longer. Second, provinces never made any serious efforts to mobilise resources falling within their jurisdiction. They remained entirely dependent on federal tax assignments and grants-in-aid. During the last four years, provincial tax and non-tax receipts increased, on average, by only four percent annually. On the other hand, federal tax assignment rose by 22.5 percent. Adding to its predicament, the NFC is faced with the absence of exact statistics of population which was in the past, the sole criterion for distribution of resources among the provinces. Census was due in 1991; it could not be held as scheduled, nor is it likely to be held in the near future. Neither are statistics on inter-provincial migration available. These two missing elements make population as a basis for distribution of revenues highly questionable. In this situation the provinces would plead for the expansion of the divisible pool, while the smaller provinces would want the NFC to adopt a new set of criteria, comprising, besides population, geographic spread, development levels, etc., of different provinces for reasons of equity. In view of the highly precarious financial position of the federation (debt-servicing and defence consuming almost all revenues), the President, in NFC's terms of reference has excluded receipts from excise duties from the divisible pool and also asked the Commission to examine the question of continuation of payments of royalties on crude oil and surcharge on natural gas. Exclusion of excise duties, royalty and surcharge, if accepted, would substantially reduce the pool and consequently the shares of the provinces, especially those of Balochistan and Sindh. The shrinkage would be greater if the federation insists its own share to be raised from 20 per cent to 30 per cent. In the present political environment and in view of the claimant needs of the provinces, these exclusions and federal share enhancement are neither practical nor advisable. Demands of the provinces for payment of royalties on account of ports and cotton and rice production seem almost frivolous. At any rate, the finances of the federation do not allow consideration of such demands at this stage. The Commission will have to attempt a balance between the claims and needs of the Centre and the provinces on the one hand and the availability of tax receipts on the other. The finances of one cannot, and should not, be strengthened at the expense of the other. What the NFC should do this time is to specify sources which the provinces must tap for increasing their revenues. They have not so far touched the source which the Constitution has exclusively reserved for them-income from farming, which constitutes 25 per cent of the gross national product. Similarly, the source of non metropolitan town properties for revenues has not been properly tapped. There may be many other sources which need to be discovered and developed to improve provincial finances. As for fixation of inter-provincial shares, the issue is complicated and sensitive. Population alone was never an appropriate criterion and, in any case, the demographic statistics are now totally out of date. Rough estimates of population may be considered as one of the factors. Others to be taken into consideration are area and the level of development of a province and, as an incentive, its efforts to mobilise its own resources. Fiscal equity demands weightage in favour of the poor. Hence backward and underdeveloped areas have a proportionately better claim than others. Similarly, creation of physical and social infrastructure and provision of utilities in a sparsely populated area require large resources than in thickly populated regions. These two factors should become important components of the new criteria. Some weightage needs to be assigned to individual efforts of the provinces to raise revenues. For that purpose, the federation may set aside a portion of funds for distribution in proportion to the ratios in which the provinces raise additional revenues each year. Although assignment for local bodies is not included in the terms of reference of the NFC, a time has come when opportunities for grass-roots participation in efforts for raising resources and for implementation of the development programme should be provided. The Commission should, therefore, devise some formula for drawing local governments into the process of development. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960109 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Calculated Terror ------------------------------------------------------------------- Editorial Column OVER and above the daily dose of violence and strife which has plagued life in Karachi for many years, Sunday's bomb explosion in a public bus is a stunning indicator of the extent of mindless mayhem to which the city now stands almost helplessly exposed. The explosion resulted in the death of seven persons and serious injuries to 35 others. The faceless purveyors of death and destruction struck at the unsuspecting busload of people in the peak traffic hour of the afternoon. Some of the critically injured may have been disabled for life and, therefore, reduced to and impoverished existence. The extent of the havoc wrought by the explosion may take time to assess as many of the bodies were charred beyond recognition and parts of others lay scattered in the debris as the Edhi workers and other volunteers rushed to the scene of the incident. The ordeal of many of the wounded passengers, even after they had been rescued, was compounded when they were rushed to the Jinnah Hospital which was reportedly quite unprepared to cope with an emergency of that magnitude. Reports spoke of a shortage of doctors and nursing staff and the hospital ran out of some vital life-saving medicines. Any attempt at apportioning blame for the-outrage amongst the many groups and factions practising violence and terror would at this stage be a meaningless exercise, especially in the absence of some new efforts either to stem the tide of violence or to resolve the underlying causes of the violent conflict. Far more important is the need to mount a new initiative to put an end to the vicious circle of violence and counter violence that has trapped Karachi for long: As a starter, there has to be a moratorium on violence agreed to by all parties involved in the conflict. The respite thus obtained may provide the opportunity for coming to grips with the causes of popular discontent and alienation in Karachi. That would, of course, call for a resumption of a dialogue-and not a pantomime -between the government and the MQM who between them hold the key to the restoration of peace and normality to Karachi. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960110 ------------------------------------------------------------------- The MQM-PML intent ------------------------------------------------------------------- M.H. Askari THE full implications of the agreement reached between the MQM and the Pakistan Muslim League during Mr Nawaz Sharifs recent visit to London are still not quite clear, but the development could mean a fresh wave of turmoil in Sindh, particularly in Karachi and Hyderabad, and that is a prospect that cannot be viewed with any sense of equanimity. The joint statement issued by the two leaders in London deplored the atrocities and brutalities suffered by the Mohajir community in Sindh, specially Karachi, and called for putting an end to the present state of affairs by bringing about an immediate change of government through a demonstration of the will of the people. In a language which is an uncomfortable reminder of the rhetorics used during the erstwhile PNA movement, directed against Zulfikar Ali Bhutto after the 1977 elections, the joint MQM-PML statement spoke of the national duty of the people to get the country out of its present mess. While the alienation of the Mohajirs from the mainstream of national politics began largely with the launching of the Operation Cleanup in Sindh in June 1992, when a government headed by Mr Nawaz Sharif was at the helm of affairs, it is undeniable that the Mohajirs have been pushed to the brink in more recent years. Little has been done by the PPP leadership to endear itself to the Mohajir community, large segments of which now suffer from an acute sense of persecution at the hands of the law enforcement agencies. There are armed cadres of militants operating in Karachi (and many other parts of Sindh) under the umbrella of almost every political party and faction. Yet, more often than not, almost every act of violence in Karachi or Hyderabad is blamed on the MQM and its activists. There have even been insinuations that MQM militants could have been involved in the bomb explosion in a bus in Karachi last Sunday. However, the Sindh chief minister, Syed Abdullah Shah, blamed the outrage on elements who want to spread chaos and disturb the peace in the country. He did not point an accusing finger at any particular group or faction. In any case, the MQM leader, Altaf Hussain, promptly expressed a deep sense of horror at what he termed as the worst form of terrorism. It is clear that the PML has a great deal to gain from the compact with the MQM, which will give the party a foothold in urban Sindh. (The PML has already the support, even though it may not be so overt at times, of the large number of Punjabi settlers in rural Sindh and among the labour in cities such as Karachi). Mr Nawaz Sharif and his party colleagues are campaigning hard for the Sanghar by-election and his claim that the political pattern has changed in the interior of Sindh also apparently arises out of the support he expects from the MQM apart from some dissident groups of the PPP. Mr Nawaz Sharif has claimed that his lengthy discussions with Mr Altaf Hussain in London led to a consensus on possible ways and means of tackling the complicated situation in Karachi and Hyderabad. However, the MQM has to evaluate the prospective gain (or loss) arising out of the London talks from its own point of view and what they could mean to the future of the Mohajirs and the MQM in the long term. After what the PPP spokesman and the prime minister herself have said, there should be no doubt that the Altaf Hussain-Nawaz Sharif deal is viewed by the ruling party as a conspiracy to subvert the democratic process. What the London statement apparently envisages is a mass struggle to bring the government down. It has warned the people that if they remained silent or inactive at the present juncture, incalculable damage may befall the country. These are ominous signals and could be interpreted to mean that the struggle that is envisaged would not be entirely peaceful or democratic. The MQM should be expected to ask itself the question: whether after all that has been happening such a programme to dislodge the government which happens to be in power would be in its larger interest or not. Mr Nawaz Sharifs record, judging from the policies followed by his government when it was in power last time cannot be regarded as exactly compassionate towards the position of the Mohajirs in Sindh. He quietly manipulated a rift between the MQM and the PPP after they had forged an alliance after the 1988 elections but coolly dumped the MQM three and a half years later when he found it expedient to impose the Operation Cleanup. Whether the Operation was launched at his behest or under pressure from the army, which is what has sometimes been argued, the fact is that it was the Mohajirs and the MQM who suffered an irretrievable setback once the operation had been launched. The MQM was split into two factions almost simultaneously and there has been nothing but the most bitter relations between them ever since. A great deal of killing which Karachi has had to witness subsequently has in fact been a direct manifestation of this rift. It must also be recalled that the late Gen Asif Nawaz went on record to say that the Operation Cleanup would be limited to a few months, with the sole objective of restoring law and order in Sindh, and that a package of social, political and economic reforms would be needed to remove the basic cause of unrest and disaffection in Sindh to ensure more durable peace and stability. The reforms could justifiably have been considered the responsibility of the government at the helm (and not the military authorities) but they never came about. In fact, the situation was allowed to further deteriorate. However, there have been suggestions that it was Gen Asif Nawaz himself who obstructed the implementation of the proposed reforms, ostensibly to maintain and, if possible, to strengthen and enlarge the hold of the military over civil affairs. Now that the General is dead, there is no way to know what exactly was the substance of such a suspicion. There were admittedly statements by Choudhry Nisar, one of Mr Nawaz Sharifs cabinet colleagues, asserting that the army had gone beyond its mandate. But even if this is considered valid, the responsibility really lay with the government. It is also a fact that at an early stage of the Operation Cleanup a list of some 77 patharedars had been drawn up so that they could be apprehended in the interest of future law and order. To the best of ones recollection, no action was taken by the government against the patharedars. Even more relevantly, there is little evidence that the intelligentsia and power elite in Punjab, which should be regarded as Mr Nawaz Sharifs main source of political strength, have demonstrated any particular compassion or sympathy for what the Mohajirs and the MQM have been going through in the recent years. On the contrary, there has been plenty of contempt for the political ambitions of the Mohajirs and some of the leading intellectuals in Lahore and Islamabad have even started a debate on whether or not the Mohajirs were justified in their claim of having spearheaded the Pakistan movement at considerable sacrifice to themselves or of upholding the ideals for which Pakistan, according to their own concept of it, was created. A leading (Punjabi) intellectual author has even suggested that the attitude of mind, which the Mohajirs brought to Pakistan with them and which expressed in their own perceived right to impose their language and culture on the people of Pakistan, amounted to Pakistan being expected to live under an alien culture. This, one hopes, represents only a minority view and is not representative of the overall thinking in Punjab and other parts of Pakistan. However, the Mohajirs must realise that, being largely concentrated in Sindh, their political future lies in Sindh. There is no denying that there are elements in Sindh who continue to regard them as intruders and outsiders. There is also no doubt that the PPP, with its base support in Punjab having been largely eroded, may want to, for reasons of expediency, identify itself with hard-line Sindhi nationalists and, in the process, even adopt an adversarial attitude towards the Mohajirs and the MQM. However, in their own interest, the MQM leadership would be ill advised to give up its efforts to maintain some sort of communication with the saner elements within Sindh and possibly even the PPP. On its part, the PPP leadership should realise that there can be no durable peace in Sindh so long as a large section of its population (i.e. the Mohajirs) remain discontented or alienated. It has been recognised by the government more than once, even at the level of the President of Pakistan, that the problem of Sindh is basically political and a political solution has to be found for the restoration of peace and calm. There has to be a moratorium on the use of force to achieve a political aim, on the part of all parties concerned. The government should in fact be expected to provide the lead in this regard. The apparently unending hunt for so-called terrorists and their alleged foreign link can only complicate matters. Statements indicting the MQM was solely responsible for containing violence in Karachi can serve little practical purpose. There are elements in the Sindhi society, both ethnic Sindhis and new Sindhis (viz: Mohajir), who earnestly yearn for peace. A group of about a hundred leading intellectuals, writers, social workers, human rights activists, both Sindhis and Mohajirs, issued an appeal last month, stressing the commonality of interests which makes it inevitable for all those living in Sindh to regard one another as their full partners in the movement for peace and harmony. The appeal has somehow not received the notice that it deserved. What is needed is a full- pledged crusade for restoring sanity among all sections of people and defeat the forces of divisiveness.

SPORTS

960106 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pakistan, Holland clash in youth hockey final ------------------------------------------------------------------- Farhana Ayaz ISLAMABAD, Jan 5: Pakistan will play Holland in the final of World Youth Hockey Festival here at Army Hockey Stadium on Saturday at 230 p.m. In two distinctive pre-finals Pakistan and Holland rallied to identical 3-0 triumphs against Japan and Belgium respectively, with the difference that while the Dutch secured the match in the first 18 minutes Pakistan did it in the last 18 minutes of the game in front of a moderate crowd gathered to witness the clash. Pakistan made heavy weather of the first session in which credit should also go to ever agile Japanese who successfully tightened off hot favourites fluent combination inside the 2S yard zone. Their defence and their goalkeeper Seiji Okada excelled to keep the hot favourites without success in the first half. In the first session Pakistan was seen struggling to push 40, with the opponents utilising their stimulating physical fitness to restrict the individual brilliance of hosts' strikers. First time tackling and passing of ball by the Japanese made Pakistani forward line lethargic as Captain Khalid with left wing Babar and the right trio of Zakirullah-Imran-Farooq kept their heads down-to manoeuvre an opener. More significantly it was Pakistan's failure on penalty corners, eight in the first half, that further raised the agony of drawing blank at the breather. In fact, on three separate occasions before half time Japan had a chance to move ahead. However, Pakistan defenders checked the Japanese movements and things were kept under control. In the second session, game was being played in quite the same tempo with Pakistan still looking for their first goal. Just after the resumption, Pakistan introduced Rana Atif in place of centre-forward Farooq to try and break the deadlock. The breakthrough finally came in the 52nd minute when a classical layoff from Rana Atif was netted by Imran Yousuf to the jubilation of the crowd and more to the satisfaction of the Pakistani bench. Six minutes later, Muhammad Usman drove home a sizzling penalty corner conversion to double the lead. Pakistan's leading goal-getter fullback Ali Raza who found himself under pressure against the Japanese shrugged off his lax attitude with a blistering shot onto the board to convert the 15th and last penalty corner for Pakistan just four minutes before the final whistle. During the last moments Pakistan was playing with nine men. After forceful charges by Imran and Aamir resulted in penalisation for yellow cards. In a postmatch comment, manager Samiullah said that Pakistan had the ability and strength to inflict a much bigger defeat on Japan but that it was off day for their penalty corner hitter besides Japan played tight hockey. The manager also stated that it will be a tough match against Holland. In the second pre-final, the Dutch venture to secure a berth in the final took only first 18 minutes, more due to the wrong technique applied by the Belgian goalkeeper Stephane Moraux. The Belgians did launch the opening attack in the 2nd minute. But the Dutch did not waste time in drawing the first blood when Mark de Jong's push sounded the board in the 5th minute. Later, the Belgian goalkeeper tried to tackle the Dutch strikers on top of the circle. The move against spearhead Jiskoot was faulty who had no trouble in beating him to ground and striking home from top of the circle in the 14th minute to make it 2-0. The match was sealed when the Dutch struck for the third time off right wing Egbert Ho in the 18th after Belgian keeper strode out to meet the charging forward. While in the second session the Dutch tried to save energy for the final against Pakistan, the Belgian keeper geared up to a better performance and foiled many attempts. Holland obtained 13 PCs but only converted the first. The Dutch manager Vettorato viewed the final as tough but he said his boys would give their best. "We wanted to play Pakistan in such a tournament to find out our real strength and weakness," he said. In the positional fixture, a solitary goal by Luca Urli gave Italy the vital win over Malaysia. Urli coverted penalty corner in the 46th minute to bang home the winner. In the clash of the underdogs, Mexico overpowered Kenya 2-0 to secure ninth position in the tournament. Leading 14 at breather, off a penalty stroke conversion by Vazgdez in the 11th minute, Mexico added its second goal when Morales converted a penalty corner in the 56th minute. In the other fixture at Wah, South Africa rolled over Russia 5-3 over shootout after the game was tied 2-2 in the regulation time. A 3rd minute lead by striker Emile Smith was equalised by the Russians four minutes before breather. At resumption the Russians were put ahead by their vibrant striker Alexei Mikheev, but SA also took no time to equalise within next three minutes. FIXTURES: Jan 6: SA vs Italy at 9.30, Japan vs Belgium at 1200 Final: Pakistan vs Holland at 2:30p.m. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960107 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pakistan beat Holland to lift youth hockey trophy ------------------------------------------------------------------- Farhana Ayaz ISLAMABAD, Jan 6: Pakistan disposed of Holland 2-0 to lift the 7up World Youth Hockey Festival trophy in front of a jam-packed Army Hockey Stadium. Japan edged past Belgium 9-8 on sudden death shootout. Trailing by two goals at the breather they held Belgium 2-2 in regulation time, scoring the equalisers in the last seven minutes of the game, to clinch third slot in the under-18 world hockey meet that concluded after ten days of competition amongst ten teams of the world. The final clash between Pakistan and Holland was a battle of rivalry between the Asian and European game strategies. Pakistan banking its hopes on its strikers faced off sturdy and firm defence by the Dutch. For Holland, the suspension of penalty corner striker J.J Vant Land proved irreversible as the Dutch scoring plan relying on penalty corner conversion flopped in seven attempts. Also, their replacement of Van, Olaf Bakker got injured off a corner shot by Pakistani striker to bring about a third change which altered the main structure of the Dutch squad. At the outset of the final, Holland initiated the opening attacks, but there were no attempts. The hosts launched their offensive from the right flank. They succeeded in acquiring the first penalty corner in the fifth minute. However, Ali Razas direct slam was deflected by the Dutch keeper Josef Kramer. In a counter move Holland right wing sent in a classical cross to the centre of the shooting circle but a full stretched dive by left wing striker Olaf Bakker fell short to connect the ball. This also sent waves of excitement in the spectators. Next, although Pakistan maintained its pressure through the right flank winger Rana Atif and spearhead Farooq fumbled with excellent open net chances. In the 14th minute Farooq after hopping onto to a gap pass from Imran Yousuf had world of time to hit a winner but his strike landed onto to the keepers pads. The left flank had one significant rally in the 18th minute with left half Waseem, who has displayed maturity during the crunch games, tapped in a classical left wing pass to Baber Abdullah but the winger failed to capitalise it. Pakistan secured their second penalty corner in the 20th minute, though Ali Razas strike was above the board. Later, Rana Atif sent wide a top of the circle attempt after Waseem had stopped Dutch Van Ryn within 25 yards. The fumbling prompted manager Samiullah to replace an off- colour Rana Atif with winger Zakirullah. The Dutch mid- fielders in their attempts to give a clean pass to forward tried mostly to scoop the ball but the strategy did not bring forth anything worthwhile for them. In the 25th, Pakistans opening goal might well have come from Farooq who was downed by the charging Dutch defender inside the shooting zone while he was trying to place the shot. A penalty corner was awarded. However Pakistani players tried for a penalty stroke. It was the thundering direct slam from full back Ali Raza onto the board that made Rawalpindi public dance in jubilation as Pakistan went one up in the 26th minute. Three minutes before breather, the Dutch stepping up efforts to equalise, saw a brilliant diving attempt by David Meuwsen foiled. This also secured their first PC, but Ali Razas speedy dash gave no time to Dutch striker Maarten Froger and the indirect hit went for a corner. Just before the half time whistle, Dutch skipper Friso Jiskoot was penalised with yellow card after he had shouted at the referee over a call inside Pakistani half. Pakistan resumed the game in much better spirits and with superior moves as the green-shirted strikers infiltrated the opponent zone without break in the first 15 minutes of the second session. The raids also produced an outstanding diving connection from right wing Zakirullah in the 46th minute. Zakirullah striding inward from his own position after a fine lay off from Irfan had the ball a little out of reach but his diving angular attempt got the keeper Kramer not ready, who was still trying to judge his moves. Leading by two goals, the charging Pakistani strikers shattered the Dutch defences. However, Dutch keeper played steadily to foil the attempts. In the 14th minute, Pakistani skipper Khalid was penalised with a yellow card for a wrong charge against a Dutch player. Playing with 10 players the Dutch found plenty of openings to penetrate the Pakistani half as they secured two penalty corners but Pakistani custodian Qasim who has remained flawless in his performances, was unbeatable. After Pakistan eased the Dutch pressure with some long hitting and two excellent moves by Farooq and Khalid, the Dutch launched another string of raids, as they earned four penalty corners, but swift dashes by Pakistanis gave them no direct attempts especially on the seventh and last PC Babar Abdullah took the ball from right under the nose of Dutch strikers and embarked on a solo run into the Dutch zone. The manager singled out left half Waseem Ahmed as the player of the tournament for Pakistan, stating that the boy has a lot of potential. Sami went on to state that with a few changes Pakistan will retain the same team for the World Junior Championship. The Holland team manager J. Vettorato said that the two changes in his team proved hard against the hosts. However, he said that Pakistan deserved to win the event since they had displayed far better technique, skill and stamina during the competition. Pakistan: Muhammad Qasim, Ali Raza, Tariq Imran, Irfan Yousuf, Muhammad Saqlain, Waseem Ahmed, Zakarullah, Ejaz Imran, Muhammad Farooq, Muhammad Khalid (capt), Aamir Mehmood, Iftikhar Ahmed, Muhammad Usman, Imran Yousuf, Rana Atif, Babar Abdullah. Holland: Olaf Bakker, Marcel Bulder, Lucas Duijndam, Maarten Froger, Danny laHaye, Egbert Ho, Michiel de Jager, Friso Jiskoot, Mark de Jong Josef, Jan Jorn, David Meuwsen, Okke Monking. Japan recorded a thrilling 9-8 win decided over shootout in a sudden death play against Belgium in the third position play- off after they held the opponents to a 2-2 draw in regulation time. This is the second time in a crucial game that the Japanese after trailing two down have gone ahead to hold their opponents. Earlier, in the vital pool-B fixture against South Africa, two down the Japanese forced the tie drawing 2-2 at the end to qualify for the semi-finals. The Belgians struck twice on two consecutive penalty corners in the first half to sit pretty in the positional play-off. They opened the account early into the game when skipper Renaod Fayt converted the first penalty corner in the 6th minute. Later Jean Blune made it 2-0 by converting the second. Although, Japan dominated better part of the game but their strikers failed to score, and it was only in the last seven minutes of the game that substitute Akabane rallied home to reduce the margin 2-1 in the 63 rd minute. Two minutes later, Hitomi Kakumaru converted the 10th PC to tie the scores 2-2. In the penalty shootout, the scores remained tied with 3-3, and the match could only be decided on a sudden death play at 6-5. Coming to terms with their stricking targets, the Malaysian strikers registered 7-3 triumph over Russia in the 7-8 position play - off at Army Stadium. Malaysia was leading 4-1 at the breather. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 960108 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Mudassar gets hundred : Pakistans 7-wkts win over India ------------------------------------------------------------------- Virendra Varma SHARJAH, Jan 7: There was hardly any dramatic twist to the script of India-Pakistan matches at Sharjah. Pakistan invariably reserve their best for India, and today it was the turn of their masters to continue what by now has become a familiar trend. Their stiff legs suddenly found enough energy and their batsmen the touch they were groping for. The transformation, even by their reckoning, was a bit surprising. And the man who made it all happen was Mudassar Nazar, carrying his bat with a brilliant unbeaten 107, his highest in one-day cricket. In official one-day internationals his best being 95 recorded against Australia at the same ground in 1986. What actually tilted the scales in the favour of Pakistan, new-comers to the tournament, was their ability to convert singles into twos, an area which had the Indians huffing and panting. In fact, Pakistan built their innings around singles and twos. There were just eight boundaries in their total of 216. Mudassar played extremely well and so was Sadiq Mohammed who chipped in with a delightful 49 off 68 balls. Sadiq has been playing regularly back home averaging over 50, and his fluent knock didnt come as a surprise. It was a team effort that saw us through in this close match. The target(216) was anyway achievable on this wicket, said the captain whose bold decision to opt for fielding surprised many. We wanted to take advantage of the heavy outfield in the morning, added Zaheer. Indian captain Sunil Gavaskar said: We didnt do justice to our abilities. The guys were stiff and it was not easy to run between the wickets. I think playing two consecutive matches was a bit too much for us. I am not trying to find an excuse for our defeat, but certainly playing on two successive days sapped out energies. India made a quiet start to their innings in the face of an accurate medium pace attack of Pakistan. Both Bakht and Mudassar bowled a maiden each before India opened their account in third over. The loss of K. Srikkanth in the fourth over, splendidly caught by Ejaz Fakih at backward short leg off Mudassar for just four, killed Indias hopes of piling up a big total (If Srikkanth gets going any score is possible. as Gavaskar put it). Gavaskar and Mohinder Amarnath quickly got into the groove and went about heir task of repairing the damage with a great deal of authority and conviction. It was a treat to watch the way the two dominated the bowling, but then again they did not have enough steam for quick threes or twos. When Gavaskar left, caught by Tasleem Arif off Iqbal Qasim, India were in a comfortable position of two for 2100 off 23.3 overs. During his flawless know of 43 off 78 balls, Gavaskar hit two glorious fours. Mohinder completed his second successive 50 in the company of Dilip Vengsarkar (28 off 31 balls with one four). The two looked in good command and were stroking freely before a tired (62 off 82 balls with four fours). Rana himself out to a direct under-arm throw from Majid Khan. Sandeep Patil did try to open up, hitting 12 off 14 balls before snicking straight into the hands of wicketkeeper Tasleem Arif, who did a great job behind the stumps despite being out of touch with the gloves for years. It were Madan Lal (33 off 29 balls) and Syed Kirmani (27 off 24 balls) who raised the momentum of the game with lusty hitting and added 63 runs off the last 58 balls. Their scintillating stroke-play put so much pressure on Pakistani fielders that they dropped as many as four simple catches  one each by Iqbal Qasim, substitute Aftab Baloch, Salim Yousuf and Zaheer Abbas  in the last two overs. But slippery fingers did help India to take the score 47 runs in the last five overs. Pakistan were off to a dream start with their openers Sadiq and Mudassar negotiating the well-balanced Indian attack with authority. The 51-year-old Sadiq initially was the most aggressive of the two and the way he chipped, pulled and on-drove had many marvelling at his ability to retain part of a once-amazing wristy touch. With Nazar digging deep into his experience, the two paced their innings according to plan: kept the score ticking. It was simply unbelievable to see the way the two, Sadiq in particular, converting singles into twoes. Where they got all that energy from was a mystery? When Sadiq left  to a standing ovation from the crowd and players  he had already made sure of a Pakistan victory. The opening pair made 113 off 26.1 overs. Zaheer promoted himself up in the order but his intentions of finishing the match met a premature, rather freak, end. A straight drive from Mudassar crashed against the stumps at the non- strikers end, catching Zaheer off the crease. Zaheer made 14 off 17 balls. With Mudassar hardly showing any signs of fatigue, the only interest left in the game was how and when the winning run would come. Salim Yousuf (19 off 22) was shaping well before running himself out. In fact, all the three Pakistan batsmen were run-out victims. After his exit, it was left to Majid Khan (12 off 17 balls)) to help Mudassar complete the formalities which he duly did in the 44th over. I was determined to carry the bat through and I am pleased things worked out to my liking. Its my first century in one-day cricket. Though it came late, still I am pretty excited about, said Mudassar who scored 107 off 140 balls with five fours. Scoreboard INDIA K. Srikkanth c Fakih b Mudassar Nazar 4 S. Gavaskar c Arif b Iqbal Qssim 43 M. Amarnath run out 62 D. Vengsarkar c Majid b Farrukh Zaman 28 S. Patil c Arif Iqbal Qasim 12 Madan Lal not out 33 S. Kirmani not out 27 TOTAL (for 5 wkts in 45 overs) 215 FALL OF WICKETS: 1/7, 2/100, 3/130, 4/152, 5/156. DID NOT BAT: K. Ghavri, S. Nayaak, B. Sandhu, S. Venkat. BOWLING: Sikandar Bakht 9-2-27-0, Mudassar Nazar 9-1-34-1, Majid Khan 9-0-42-0, Iqbal Qasim 9-0-46-2, Farrukh Zaman 5-0-40-1, Wasim Raja 4- 0-22-0. PAKISTAN Mudassar Nazar not out 107 Sadiq Mohammad run out 49 Zaheer Abbas run out 14 Salim Yousuf run out 19 Mjaid Khan not out 12 Extras (lb-8, nb-2, w-5) 15 TOTAL (for 3 wkts in 43.4 overs) 216 FALL OF WICKETS: 1/113, 2/140, 3/176. DID NOT BAT: Taslim Arif, Iqbal Qasim, Sikandar Bakht, Farrukh Zaman, Ijaz Fakih, Wasim Raja. BOWLING: B. Sandhu 4-0-16-0, Madan Lal 6. 4-0-30-0, S. Patil 6-1-28-0, S. Venkat 9-0-34-0, S. Nayak 9-0-55-0, K. Ghavri 9-0-44-0. RESULT: Pakistan won by 7 wkts. MAN OF THE MATCH: Mudassar Nazar. 33

Dawn page