-------------------------------------------------------------------

DAWN WIRE SERVICE

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Week Ending : 4 May, 1995 Issue : 01/17

-------------------------------------------------------------------
The DAWN Wire Service (DWS) is a free weekly news-service from Pakistan's largest English language newspaper, the daily DAWN. DWS offers news, analysis and features of particular interest to the Pakistani Community on the Internet. Extracts from DWS can be used provided that this entire header is included at the beginning of each extract. We encourage comments & suggestions. We can be reached at: e-mail dws%dawn@sdnpk.undp.org fax +92 (21) 568-3188 & 568-3801 mail Pakistan Herald Publications (Pvt.) Limited DAWN Group of Newspapers Haroon House, Karachi 74400, Pakistan (c) Pakistan Herald Publications (Pvt.) Ltd., Pakistan - 1995 ===================================================================

CONTENTS

NATIONAL NEWS

Human Rights Convention ..........HRCP may verify MQM charges of 'excesses' ..........HRCP for independent judicial system ..........Special laws required to protect human rights: PM SAARC summit ..........SAARC may consider change in charter ..........Leghari, Rao meet : India agrees talks on Kashmir Karachi & MQM ..........Govt MQM talks continue in London ..........Farooq Sattar hospitalised ..........3 cops, 5 others killed in city Opposition ..........Nawaz seeks trial by larger bench ..........Sharif family's mill being liquidated Kashmir ..........US accuses Pakistan of aiding Kashmiris Chakwal station to be operated by Pakistanis UK govt urged to help Pakistan combat violence Plan to induct & build mine-hunters: Mirani EU opposes move, slams Washington Extortion victim speaks out Pakistan may play key role in US-Iran row --------------------------------------

BUSINESS & ECONOMICS

UK firm to advice on sale of PTC shares +++The Business & Financial Week ----------------------------------------

EDITORIALS & FEATURES

Criminal breach of trust By Ardeshir Cowasjee Questionable moves in electronic media sector By Javed Jabbar Friends not foes The signals are confusing, but welcome From M. Ziauddin India can make 80 N-bombs, Pakistan 25 From Masood Haider *From the Press Gallery ..........An intelligent opposition move Nasir Malick ------------

SPORTS

Zubair goes down fighting to Jansher Khan =================================================================== DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS ===================================================================

NATIONAL NEWS

DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950429 ------------------------------------------------------------------- HRCP may verify MQM charges of 'excesses' ------------------------------------------------------------------- By A Correspondent KARACHI, April 28: The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan may constitute an international team to verify alleged excesses against activists of Mohajir Qaumi Movement, HRCP conference sources said. This was stated by HRCP chairperson Asma Jehangir on Friday when a two-member MQM delegation, led by its deputy leader in the Sindh Assembly, apprised foreign delegates attending the regional conference on human rights of the alleged violations of human rights by the state apparatus, and sought their intervention in this regard, said the sources. Delegates from India, Sri Lanka Bangladesh, Nepal and Bhutan expressed deep concern over the presentation, during which the MQM delegation also distributed copies of the 1000-page petition filed before the Supreme Court. The HRCP chairperson explained that "while allegations levelled by the MQM are serious, at the same time equally serious allegations have been levelled against the MQM as well. "Such a controversial situation cannot be taken up without proper verification," she said and emphasised that "owing to political polarisation and fear of violence, verification can only be carried out by an international mediation team." The MQM delegation agreed to cooperate with any such team which would be nominated by the HRCP, and as such the HRCP chairperson promised to consult to executives and thereafter proceed in the matter, the sources said. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950430 ------------------------------------------------------------------- HRCP for independent judicial system ------------------------------------------------------------------- By Shamim-ur-Rahman KARACHI, April 29: The three-day regional conference on human rights on Saturday called upon governments to make prevalence the rule of law and independent judicial system their primary concern and urged the countries of the region refrain from mutual hostilities and proxy wars. The Karachi Declaration issued at the end of the conference resolved that the tendency of the governments to suppress or punish dissent was wholly unacceptable and should be eschewed. "A state should be secular and engender a secular outlook in society," the conference emphasised and added that "it should strictly follow a non-discriminatory policy in all respects." Regretting that "governments tend to express human rights concerns selectively and for political objectives" it emphasised the need for finding quick and effective remedies against incidence or tendency towards intolerance. "The role of judiciary should be strengthened towards this end," it said. The conference also called upon the countries of the region to "refrain from mutual hostilities, cold or proxy wars and negative propaganda and proceed to defuse existing tensions and preferably use mediation, where necessary, of other countries of the region." The conference emphasised the need for promoting people to people relations, especially among the youth and professional groups, and cultural exchanges of all categories. The conference further resolved that "anti-terrorist laws have served more to victimise innocent people than to end civilian discontent or militancy." "A government does not need this addition to its armoury to combat any terrorism that exist in its society," the declaration said. It expressed grave concern over the threat posed by intolerance to stability and development within the countries and to cooperation and peace in the region. It noted that intolerance also often bitterly divides a community against itself, of which Karachi was one of the current examples. It also called upon the countries of SAARC to set up committees to address problems of intolerance in the region. It also called upon them to ratify the core international covenant protocols, and conventions like CEDAW and the convention against torture and bring their domestic legislations in line with these instruments. It resolved to work towards peaceful and speedy resolution of conflicts born of poverty, racism gender discrimination, crime and all forms of violence; to fight against violation of rights, including the rights of the child, and to promote good relations between the people of the region. The declaration called upon human rights NGOs to promote the idea of a regional charter and a regional court of human rights and to press their governments in that direction. The conference also called for setting up a South Asian People's tribunal for child rights as a nongovernment body registered with SAARC secretariat to take note of violations and abuse and monitor implementation of the convention of the rights of the child. At the end the conference adopted two resolutions. One of them expressed its deep concern at the human rights situation in Bhutan, especially the plight of more than 100,000 Bhutanese refugees. It resolved that expulsion of thousands of Bhutanese citizen and arbitrary detention of political dissenters and human rights defenders were manifestations of intolerance. Calling for release of "all political poisoners immediately, and unconditionally the conference urged the Royal Government of Bhutan to immediately facilitate the return of Bhutanese refugees from the neighbouring countries. Through another resolution, the conference expressed satisfaction over the call given by the parliament of Sri Lanka and the demand made by the Prime Minister of Pakistan that the Burmese state law and order restoration council immediately release Daw Aung San Suu Kyi >from her six years of house arrest, along with all other political prisoners. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950428 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Special laws required to protect human rights: PM ------------------------------------------------------------------- By Shamim-ur-Rahman KARACHI, April 27: Reaffirming her commitment to the ideals and objectives of human rights, Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on Thursday emphasised the need for creating public awareness, constitutional amendment and special laws for special situation as the rights of citizens were under attack from forces of tyranny, extremism and terrorism. "To protect human rights, we need to create public awareness and forge unity to defeat the forces of darkness which seek to obliterate the light of civilisation," she said while inaugurating a three-day regional conference on "Human Rights and Tolerance, An Asian Perspective." Ms Bhutto said tolerance and human rights were enshrined in the principles of Islam and these were at the heart of human dignity. She said human rights must include the right to worship according to one's belief because such freedom was at the heart of Islam and at the core of Pakistan's founding principles. Human rights, she said, also concerned the fundamental freedoms, including the freedom to speak without fear, to work without discrimination, to engage in political activities and to decide the destiny of their nations through free, fair and impartial elections held at regular intervals. She said that unfortunately in present-day society, there are vigilante groups, who seek to exact revenge for themselves and take the law in their own hands although in a civilised society the law must take its own course. Defending the laws her government recently promulgated to deal with acts of terrorism, Ms Bhutto said special laws were required to deal with such crimes because under the existing laws it was difficult to convict murderers of innocent people as they got bailed out. "We are committed to protecting human rights but at the same time, we are detained to eradicate crime and not let the hardened criminals go scot-free," said the Prime Minister. She expressed confidence that soon people would realise the significance of the law. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950501 ------------------------------------------------------------------- SAARC may consider change in charter ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From Mahmood Zaman NEW DELHI, April 30: The eighth SAARC summit begins here on Tuesday to consider an amendment to its charter to make room for bilateral resolution of outstanding conflicts in the region and suggest measures to improve cooperation. After the first day's informal meeting in the morning, held to finalise the summit declaration Pakistan Foreign Minister Sardar Assef Ahmed Ali told reporters that "a feeling had emerged among the member-states to review the SAARC charter, keeping pace with needs and requirements for the second decade of the seven-nation regional body. What is being felt is the need to suggest a mechanism to resolve conflicts among the member-states through bilateral talks." The SAARC charter, approved in 1985,does not provide for raising bilateral issues. The move to amend the charter could only meet with success if there is unanimity of view on the need to change the 10 year old document. Sunday's meeting of foreign ministers also decided that the SAARC Preferential Trading Arrangement (SAPTA), approved during the seventh summit conference in Dhaka, would be ratified by Dec 8 this year. Replying to a question, Mr Ali said Pakistan's stand on Kashmir was based on principles and President Leghari was to take up the matter with Indian Prime Minister Narasimha Rao when the latter would call upon the President. He said New Delhi should also take into account the price it was paying to keep the issue boiling. Both India and Pakistan were poor states and must set their priorities keeping in view the cost of armaments, nuclear, missile and conventional, and the grave conditions of poverty among their people. During the first session of foreign ministers conference, emphasis was on economic and social issues which the heads of state and government would discuss in the light of far-reaching global changes which had taken place in the recent past. The session showed the same spirit of consensus and cooperation that had characterised the previous meetings. Pakistan, the foreign minister said, was fully committed to the SAARC process and had contributed to the evolution of the association and its on-going projects under the integrated programme of action. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950503 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Leghari, Rao meet : India agrees talks on Kashmir ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From Mahmood Zaman NEW DELHI, May 2: President Farooq Ahmad Khan Leghari discussed Kashmir and other issues of bilateral interest when he met Indian Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao here on Tuesday after the inaugural session of the SAARC summit, which began at the elegant Vigyan Bhavan Conference hall. After their first meeting, which lasted about 50 minutes, President Leghari said in the presence of the Indian Prime Minister that he had discussed with Mr Rao "the core issue, that is Kashmir, and we have felt that the dispute must be resolved through peaceful means and not by military means". The two leaders were aided in bilateral talks by their foreign ministers and diplomats. "India also wishes so (that the Kashmir dispute should be resolved peacefully) and wants to discuss the issue at all levels, political, intellectual and other fora", the president added. President Leghari said both the countries had felt that despite the positions taken by them on the Kashmir question, it was necessary that talks must continue and no side should feel hesitant on this question. He said talks should take place at levels other than the official level. He said he had apprised the Indian Prime Minister of Pakistan's concern over atrocities being committed in Kashmir and the desire that a peaceful resolution of the Kashmir question be found. Responding to a question, Mr Rao said he agreed with President Leghari's view that negotiations must continue. To another question, he said he would not rule out the possibility of having discussed Kashmir. Replying to a question on the Indian government's plans to hold elections in Kashmir, President Leghari said Pakistan believed that elections there would be meaningless in the presence of troops and when atrocities were being perpetrated on Kashmiris. But, he said, the question of elections in Kashmir was not raised during their talks. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950428 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Govt MQM talks continue in London ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From Athar Ali LONDON, April 27: While talks between the Sindh government and the local leaders of the Mohajir Qaumi Movement are continuing, there cannot be any prospect of direct talks with MQM leader Altaf Hussain who is living here in self imposed exile. This was stated by a two-man team of Karachi politicians sent to Britain by the government to explain to the Pakistani community and also British members of parliament the reasons for the deterioration in law and order situation in Sindh. Senator Kamal Azfar and Mr Iqbal Yusuf on Wednesday met the junior minister at the Foreign Office, Mr Tony Baldry, who had recently led a trade mission to Pakistan. Iqbal Yusuf, adviser to the Sindh chief minister, said there was a lack of commitment in the country to the problems of urban areas. He said that the local MQM leaders, with whom the Sindh government had been negotiating, lacked the will to take vital decisions and were almost a "hostage" to Altaf Hussain. He said a great deal of understanding had to be created in order to tackle the situation in Karachi which, he believed, was also being exploited by foreign elements. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950504 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Farooq Sattar hospitalised ------------------------------------------------------------------- By Our Staff Correspondent KARACHI, May 3: The under detention Leader of the Opposition in the Sindh Assembly, Dr Mohammad Farooq Sattar, was admitted to the National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease late on Tuesday night. According to an MQM Press release, he was admitted to the hospital due to pain in his chest. He had suffered a heard attack one-and-a- half day months back and on Tuesday, his condition deteriorated, after which he was taken to the institute where doctors examined and admitted him. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950503 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 cops, 5 others killed in city ------------------------------------------------------------------- By Our Staff Reporter KARACHI, May 2: Eight people, including three cops, were killed in clashes between rival groups of Mohajir Qaumi Movement and attacks on police in the last 24 hours. Four people were killed on Tuesday night in clashes between rival groups of Mohajir Qaumi Movement in Asif Colony. Two of them were Haqiqi activists, one belonged to the Altaf group and the fourth was a pedestrian. Police claimed that some unidentified men came to Asif Colony in a Suzuki Hiroof and attacked Haqiqi workers. In the shooting from both sides, four people were killed. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950501 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nawaz seeks trial by larger bench ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bureau Report LAHORE, April 30: Former prime minister Mian Nawaz Sharif has challenged the trial of plots reference against him in the special court under the President's Order 16 of 1977 and requested that his constitutional petition in this behalf be heard by 'a larger bench of senior judges," of the Lahore High Court. In particular, the petition says, the special court order summoning him to appear and answer the charge on May 8 should be declared to be "without lawful authority and of no legal effect." The petition challenges the special court order dismissing the accused's plea for acquittal before the framing of charge under Section 265(K) of the Criminal Procedure Code and mostly reiterates the arguments advanced in favour of the discharge application before the special court. Though the petition is mainly directed against the dismissal of the discharge application under Section 265(K), it challenges the very assumption of jurisdiction by the special court "as the jurisdictional facts, the objective existence of which is essential for such assumption, are missing from the case." The order suffers >from the lack of jurisdiction, the petition alleges. Citing the special court, the interior ministry and the LDA director- general as respondents, Mr Sharif alleged that he was being subjected to a systematic campaign of victimisation "intended to annihilate him economically and to oust him from the political seen. "The sharp sting of confrontation has been converted into personal animosity and has culminated into launching of malicious criminal proceedings" against him under Article 3 of the Holders of Representative Offices (Punishment for Misconduct) Order (XVI of 1977). DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950504 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sharif family's mill being liquidated ------------------------------------------------------------------- LAHORE, May 3: The Lahore High Court has ordered the liquidation of the Sharif family's Hamza Board Mills for its inability to repay about Rs 46.2 million in bank credit now or ever. Hamza is a public limited company but is not, unlike other Ittefaq and Sharif concerns, listed on the stock exchange. Among the directors are ex-premier Mian Nawaz Sharif's father, Mohammad Sharif, mother Begum Shamim Akhtar, son Hussain Nawaz, daughter Maryam Nawaz, brother Abbas Sharif (MNA), nephew Hamza Shahbaz and sister-in-law Nusrat Shahbaz (wife of the self- exiled Leader of the Opposition in the Punjab Assembly). The directors are personally liable if company assets are found to they have been misappropriated DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950504 ------------------------------------------------------------------- US accuses Pakistan of aiding Kashmiris ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From Our Staff Correspondent WASHINGTON, May 3: There are credible reports of support by the Government of Pakistan for Kashmiri militants, a report released by the US State Department on patterns of global terrorism in 1994 has claimed. The report compiled for the year 1994 said in its overview of Asia that Pakistan continued to provide support to some of the freedom fighters in Indian-occupied Kashmir. The official US statement contained in the report denies Pakistani claims that it was helping the Kashmiris through moral, political and diplomatic support. Coming within days after Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto's visit to Washington, the report negates Pakistani claims that her visit had brought Washington closer to the Pakistani point of view on Kashmir. Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto had claimed on arrival back from Washington that Pakistan's position on Kashmir had been vindicated in her US visit. The report devotes two paragraphs to India and three to Pakistan but the charge that Pakistan was helping the Kashmiris officially has been repeated in both the sections. In its comments on Pakistan, the report says "The Government of Pakistan acknowledges that it continues to give moral, political and diplomatic support to Kashmiri militants but denies allegations of other assistance. There were credible reports in 1994, however, of official Pakistani support to Kashmiri militants. Some support came >from private organisations such as the Jamaat-i-Islami. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950428 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Chakwal station to be operated by Pakistanis ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From M. Ziauddin ISLAMABAD,April 27:The proposed UN-sponsored Chakwal seismic station, which is yet to be built, would not be capable of monitoring Pakistan's nuclear programme or other sensitive installations, Foreign Minister Sardar Assef Ahmed Ali told a group of senior journalists at the foreign office here on Thursday. Assisted by senior officials from his ministry and top technical personnel from the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission(PAEC),the foreign minister explained that the centre, which would be equipped with about 200,000 dollars worth of US-made state-of- the-art equipment, would be capable only of detecting earthquakes and manmade underground explosions, including low-intensity tests, with high precision. He conceded, however that the UN sponsorship of the seismic system was related to the implementation of a global verification under the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty(CTBT) as and when it was successfully negotiated and came into force. Appealing to the Press not to perceive a sell-out where there was none, the minister said India, Iran and China already had this capability, and '-our participation in the global exercise will, therefore, enable Pakistan to match this capability with India." He said the station would be manned, maintained and operated entirely by Pakistan engineers and technicians. He said neither Iran nor China had protested to Pakistan officially on the matter and added that "delay in launching of our Array(station)has been caused due to postponement in the supply of equipment donated by the US and Norway." Answering a question, he said since it was an UN-sponsored installation, the supply of the highly sophisticated equipment from the US for the station would not come under the purview of the Pressler law. Technical experts said the Chakwal site was selected because it had granite rocky surface, an ideal platform for setting up such a station. They said Pakistan had 100 per cent data-collection capability but it faced some limitations on the score of analysis. But here, too, there were offers from the international organisation to train Pakistan scientists in the art of data analysis. All data collected would go to the Data Centre in Washington during the experimental period. After experimental period of two years was over, Pakistan would not be obliged to send the data for analysis any where, they added. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950430 ------------------------------------------------------------------- UK govt urged to help Pakistan combat violence ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From Our Correspondent LONDON, April 29: An "early day motion" has been tabled before the House of Commons urging the British government "to assist the government of Pakistan in every way to combat crime and violence." The motion has so far been signed by 40 members belonging to all the three main political parties. The move has been sponsored by Labour member of parliament, Max Madden. The Labour MP feels the majority of his Pakistani constituents condemn without reservation religious hatred and religious intolerance wherever and however it occurs in Pakistan. They want those responsible for sectarian violence, including murder, arson and bomb attacks, to be brought to justice without delay. The 'early day motion' urges members of British Parliament to use their influence on political parties in Pakistan to support any legislation brought before the National Assembly to repeal or reform the blasphemy laws introduced under martial law. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950430 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Plan to induct & build mine-hunters: Mirani ------------------------------------------------------------------- KARACHI, April 29: Defence Minister Aftab Shahban Mirani said here on Saturday that Pakistan planned to induct mine-hunters in the navy with transfer of technology for their construction in the country. Mr. Mirani said these mine hunters would also include the Eridan class. Speaking as the chief guest at the rebuild completion ceremony at Pakistan Navy Submarine at PNS Abdoze ground, PN dockyard, Mr Mirani said the government was not oblivious of the naval requirements of the country. He said that the government was striving to encourage indigenous production of defence equipment, as no country could depend entirely on outside sources for its defence requirements. He said that a second naval harbour at Ormara was already under construction and would prove to be a valuable asset for the country on completion. Similarly, Jinnah Naval Base would have refit and rebuild yard and would be an important stride towards self-reliance and indigenous construction he added. He said that Pakistan had recently acquired the Type-21 frigates from Britain as an interim measure to fill the gap due to the unexpected return of frigates leased from the US. He said that Pakistan Navy was in the process of acquiring modern and state-of-the-art submarines from France which is expected to substantially improve the strike capability of the Navy. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950503 ------------------------------------------------------------------- EU opposes move, slams Washington ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From Shadaba Islam BRUSSELS, May 2: American plans for trade sanctions against Iran have come in for fierce criticism from the European Union. French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, current chairman of the EU's decision-making Council of Minsisters, has said that the EU "does not believe in unilateral embargoes". EU officials in Brussels say the Union intends to continue its "critical dialogue" with Tehran. Of the 15 EU states, France, Germany and Britain have said clearly that they will not follow the American initiative. German Economic Minister Guenter Rexrodt said in a radio interview that Bonn did not believe that a trade embargo is "the appropriate instrument for influencing opinion in Iran". "The right thing to do is to conduct a political dialogue with Iran," Rexrodt added. "Only political dialogue can bring Iran to behave responsibly." A British Foreign Office spokesman said London maintained a policy of "critical dialogue" with Iran, but denied allegation of a rift between the EU and the US on the issue. But, EU officials say that President Clinton's decision to cut off trade and investment ties with Iran has taken the Union by surprise. According to French diplomats the EU was not consulted by the Americans although Washington is clearly seeking European support in its policy vis-a-vis Iran. The EU has made clear that despite pressure from the US it has no intention of curbing the activities of private European businessmen in Iran. EU officials say that while the Union has often denounced Iran's flouting of international law, and specially the death sentence passed on British author Salman Rushdie, there are no plans to freeze relations with Tehran. "We intend to leave all lines of communication open with a country which is an important trading partner and an important regional power," an official commented. "We are attentive on all issues that relate to human rights and the respect of international law," the Commission spokesman said. According to statistics published by the European Commission, the bilateral trade flows between the E.U. and Iran were valued at over 14 billion dollars in 1993. The E.U. imported goods worth 7 billion dollars from Iran, with oil accounting for 6 billion dollars of the total. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950504 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Extortion victim speaks out ------------------------------------------------------------------- By Our Staff Reporter KARACHI, May 3: A prominent city industrialist who claimed to have been the victim of extortion for the last few months, went public on Wednesday by accusing Mohajir Qaumi Movement (Haqiqi) chief Afaq Ahmed Khan and his party of carrying out Tuesday's Rs 4.3 million robbery at his mills and extorting money from other industrialists. Farooq Summar, 46, the former chairman of All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (Sindh-Balochistan Zone) and the owner of Rs 1,000- million Mohammad Farooq Textile Mills in Korangi, unfolded a series of events. Mr Sumar, who is also the chairman of the National Textile Foundation, said after a daylight robbery at his Korangi factory on Tuesday afternoon, an anonymous telephone call later in the night and police refusal to register a case against Afaq Ahmed Khan, he had decided to tell the people "every thing." Giving the details, Mr Sumar said the Haqiqi leaders started giving him and his employees threats when he started resisting frequent demands for cash by the party which had become larger and more frequent during the last seven to eight months. Mr Sumar claimed that the police were performing the role of a silent spectator and were unwilling to take any action against the Haqiqi activists. "We have to force the government to stop supporting criminals and their activities. There is not just terrorism in Karachi. In my view it is political terrorism, opposition terrorism, agency terrorism, and religious terrorism," he said. "The government should not ignore economic and business activity in Pakistan just because billions of dollars are coming from abroad, but billions of dollars are already invested in Karachi," he added. The MQM Haqiqi, he alleged, instigated, planned and executed the Tuesday's robbery since he had not given in to their earlier attempts to extort money. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950504 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pakistan may play key role in US-Iran row ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From Shaheen Sehbai WASHINGTON, May 3: Pakistan is likely to assume a crucial role, both for Iran and the United States, following the declaration of a trade war by President Clinton against the oil-rich country he describes as a "rogue state." "We will have to play an important role because we might just be the only country which could act as a bridge between these two embattled states," a senior Pakistan diplomat said. But Pakistani diplomats dismissed fears that the strong association of Islamabad with Tehran could bring some negative fallout of the trade embargo for Pakistan as well. "Pakistan and the United States have reached that level of mutual understanding which automatically defines many parameters and there is not likely to be any misunderstanding on that count," the senior Pakistan diplomat told Dawn. But some circles fear that Pakistan could face pressures from Washington if the trade war escalated and Washington had to face the continued cold response to the embargo from its major allies and friends, as witnessed in initial reactions round the globe. These circles believe that Pakistan was already the closest geographic, physical and ideological link between the rest of the world and Iran. In the face of a trade ban, followed by other economic sanctions it would automatically become a religious and national duty of Pakistan to provide Iran with whatever it could to defy the ban, these circles believe. They hope that Washington would show a sense of understanding and would not treat any assistance and help by the Pakistani people to Iranians as a gesture of defiance by the government of Pakistan against the trade sanctions on Tehran. Diplomatic observers are sure that Washington would be viewing the growing economic ties between Pakistan and Iran, specially the talk of a gas pipeline from the Gulf through Iran, Pakistan and eventually India, with suspicion. The general reaction to the trade embargo against Iran has been negative and already US media have started describing the Clinton move as a disaster. Senior columnist Arnaud de Borchgrave said in The Washington Times on Wednesday that United States "now finds itself isolated on both the Iraqi oil sanctions and the Iranian trade ban." Former US Secretary of State Alexander Haig opposed the ban strongly and echoed reactions from Europe, Japan and other moderate Arab states which had rejected the embargo. "There are two major Gulf powers, Iran and Iraq, and it makes no geopolitical sense to treat these two traditional rivals for influence as co-equal enemies of the United States," Haig told the Washington Times. He even quoted the Israeli reaction to the trade ban and said the Rabin government believes that a total boycott of Iran could make renewed terrorism a self-fulfilling prophecy. =================================================================== DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS ===================================================================

BUSINESS & ECONOMICS

950428 ------------------------------------------------------------------- UK firm to advice on sale of PTC shares ------------------------------------------------------------------- Bureau Report ISLAMABAD, April 27:The Privatisation Commission has selected British company Morgan Grenfell as the financial advisers for the sale of 26 per cent shares, along with the transfer of management control to a strategic investor, of the state-run Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation, an official announcement said on Thursday. The short-listed companies, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs of the United States and Britain's Morgan Grenfell, had contested for the position. The bids were opened on April 10 and their offers were assessed by the Privatisation Commission. "Morgan Grenfell, in collaboration with Coopers and Lybrand, Denton Hall, Muslim Commercial Bank and Abacus Consulting, have been selected as the financial advisers for the second phase of privatisation of the Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation," a Press release issued by the Privatisation Commission said. The government intends to convert the PTC into a public limited company by December 1995 when the management would be transferred to a strategic investor. Morgan Grenfell is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Deutsche Bank Group and has acted as financial advisers to different governments on four telecom privatisations involving the sale of a shareholding to a strategic investor. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950429 ------------------------------------------------------------------- +++The Business & Financial Week ------------------------------------------------------------------- +++PAKISTAN and the UAE have agreed to explore the avenues of laying sub-marine optic fibre which will adequately fufil the potential telecom of needs of the region. +++NBP is planning to concentrate on equity participation with clients rather than normal lending which has been the norm since the sixties. +++THE IFC is making an equity investment of US$ 300,000 in Abamco Ltd, which is expected to become the first asset management to be established in Pakistan. +++KESC is facing a problem of power shortage to the tune of 45kw due to the closure of KANUPP for maintenance purpose. +++PAKISTAN is likely to start exporting Reti and Bajri (sand for construction) to the Maldives, as shipments of 50,0W tonnes each are ready for despatch at the initial stages. +++FOREIGN Investment to LDCs in expected to total $81.9 billion this year, being less than half of what it was in the preceding year. +++THE ICCI chief has called upon the government to formulate a trade policy for 1995-96 based on long term vision and focussing on strengthening the manufacturing sector as well as being export oriented. +++FEDERAL Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources is to award about 15 new licences to various international companies for oil and gas exploration in the next two months. +++THE Federal government has engaged a team of American technical consultants on the payment of $2 million to come to Pakistan and import training to the manufacturers of surgical instruments in Sialkot. +++SINGLE Window clearance facility has been formally inaugurated at the Karachi Port Trust, at West Wharf for the clearance of motor vehicles, personal baggage and other cargo. +++RS 83 billion resources from the public as well as private sector have been put together under the PM's Karachi Package in an attempt at making Karachi self-reliant in energy. +++5 million acres of textile land has been badly damaged by water bogging and salinity throughout the country affecting 28 per cent of the total textile land in Pakistan. ------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBSCRIBE TO HERALD TODAY ! ------------------------------------------------------------------- Every month the Herald captures the issues, the pace and the action, shaping events across Pakistan's lively, fast-moving current affairs spectrum. This month in Herald 1) Who's Afraid of Imran Khan ? A Herald special report on Imran Khan's journey into the uncharted waters of pressure group politics... plus exclusive interviews with Imran Khan Sarfaraz Nawaz General Hameed Gul 2) The Empire Strikes Back The crisis in Chechnya and the Russian connection 3) Roadblocks on the Information Highway A look at how the country's entry into the rank of interacting nations is being hampered by short-sighted government policies.... ...and of course, much, much more..... Subscribe to Herald and get the whole story. Annual Subscription Rates : North America & Australasia US$ 72 Rs. 2,088 Africa, East Asia Europe & UK US$ 60 Rs. 1,656 Middle East, Indian Sub-Continent & CAS US$ 45 Rs. 1,200 Latin America & Caribbean US$ 90 Rs. 2,520 Please send the following information : Name, Postal Address, Telephone, Fax, e-mail address, and old subscription number (where applicable). Payments (payable to Herald) can be by crossed cheque ( for Pakistani Rupees), or by demand draft drawn on a bank in New York, NY (for US Dollars). Allow 45 days for first issue. Send payments and subscriber information to : G.M Circulation, The Herald P.O.Box 3740, Karachi, Pakistan DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS ===================================================================

EDITORIALS & FEATURES

950428 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Criminal breach of trust ------------------------------------------------------------------- By Ardeshir Cowasjee ONE just cannot condone waste, any waste. And, one must not, under any circumstances, condone the criminal waste of public funds, and the use of such funds for private gain or personal glorification. The funds belonging to a nation and its people constitute a "sacred trust". In our case, the prime trustee of that trust, the Prime Minister, is primarily responsible for ensuring that the funds held in trust are not misused. Relevant safeguards pertaining to this trust are enshrined in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. For example. "Preamble "Whereas sovereignty over the entire Universe belongs to Almighty Allah alone, and the authority to be exercised by the people of Pakistan within the limits prescribed by Him is a sacred trust; "And whereas it is the will of the people of Pakistan to establish an order Wherein the State shall exercise its powers and authority through the chosen representatives of the people" "3. The State shall ensure the elimination of all forms of exploitation and the gradual fulfilment of the fundamental principle, from each according to his ability and to each according to his work." "29.(1) The Principles set out in this Chapter shall be known as the Principles of Policy, and it is the responsibility of each organ and authority of the State, and of each person performing functions on behalf of an organ or authority of the State, to act in accordance with those Principles insofar as they relate to the functions of the organ or authority. "(2) Insofar as the observance of any particular Principle of Policy may be dependent upon resources being available for the purpose, the Principle shall be regarded as being subject to the availability of resources. "(3) In respect of each year, the President in relation to the affairs of the Federation, and the Governor of each Province in relation to the affairs of his Province, shall cause to be prepared and laid before the National Assembly or, as the case may be, the Provincial Assembly, a report on the observance and implementation of the Principles of Policy, and provision shall be made in the rules of procedure of the National Assembly or, as the case may be, the Provincial Assembly, for discussion on such report. "38. The State shall. "(a) secure the well-being of the people, irrespective of sex, caste, creed or race, by raising their standard of living...; "(b) provide for all citizens, within the available resources of the country, facilities for work and adequate livelihood with reasonable rest and leisure; "(c) provide for all persons employed in the service of Pakistan or otherwise, social security by compulsory social insurance or other means "(d) provide basic necessities of life, such as food, clothing, housing, education and medical relief, for all such citizens irrespective of sex, caste, creed or race, as are permanently or temporarily unable to earn their livelihood on account of infirmity, sickness or unemployment. "218.(1) The President, a Governor, the Prime Minister, a Federal Minister, a Minister of State, the Chief Minister and a Provincial Minister shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise of powers and performance of functions of their respective offices or for any act done or purported to be done in the exercise of those powers and performance of those functions: "Provided that nothing in this clause shall be construed as restricting the right of any person to bring appropriate proceedings against the Federation or a Province. "(2) No criminal proceedings whatsoever shall be instituted or continued against the President or a Governor in any court during his term of office. "(3) No process for the arrest or imprisonment of the President or a Governor shall issue from any court during his term of office." N.B. The immunity as set out in (2) and (3) above does not extend to the Prime Minister, to the Chief Ministers, to their Ministers and Advisers, or to the servants of their Governments. Take this month's visit to the US by our Prime Minister, with her substantial retinue and entourage, more correctly referred to as ballast or baggage. What were the losses sustained, the gains accrued? The intangibles (the loss of remnant repute and respect, the earned ridicule) cannot be quantified in terms of money, the tangibles can. The sums I have done are, perforce, rough rounded estimates, ballpark figures, since our government as a matter of policy holds in its secret sacred trust all truths, so that the people remain totally ignorant of what is spent, squandered or stashed away in their name. The main heads of expenditure: 1) Advance preparation for PM's visit: Expenses incurred by Cambridge Chaudhry Senator Aitzaz Ahsan, former law minister Senator Groovy Haider, Adviser Baaji Nahid and their retinue, plus hullagulla wallahs necessary to organise cheer-leaders, to buy off the MQM anti- squads, plus large amounts paid to US lobbyists and PR consultants = US$ 5 million (2) PM's special 'plane, plus backup' plane cost, expenses plus loss of earning = US$ 2 million. (3) Other travelling expenses in Pakistan and in the US; hotel expenses at the Waldorf Astoria, New York (why not PIA's Roosevelt?), Willard, Washington, and Los Angeles hotels, limousine hire charges; stayover/stayback expenses for PM and family (The Dorchester, London) friends, hangers-on (reportedly 150/180 went in dribs and drabs) = for approx. 10 days, say US$ 1 million. (4) Advertisements in the Press: 16-page supplement/ads in Washington Post at US$ 63,228 per page, in New York Times at US$ 67,110 per page, Los Angeles Times at US$ 61,340 per page, 8 pages of ads in Time Magazine plus 'charges' for portraying our Prime Minister on the cover of the Time (Asian edition only), and advertisements in other US publications = say, US$ 2,250,000 (5) Fashion/cultural show in Washington and Los Angeles, masterminded by the wife of Foreign Secretary Najmuddin Sheikh = US$ 0.5 million. Say, total debit = US$ 10.75 million x Rs. 31.75 = Rs. 34 crores. Columnist Khalid Hasan from Washington estimated a total of US$ 10.5 million and the editor of Nawa-i-Waqt from Lahore Rs. 35 crores. We three and the people of Pakistan would be very happy were the government to be able to prove us wrong. On the credit side: The US has agreed to return to us non-unable spare parts, unrepaired, in the same condition in which they were sent to them in 1990. The storage charges plus the return freight for this 'scrap' will be borne by the people of Pakistan. The Prime Minister does not deny that she and her family spend our money wantonly on "international relations" usually involving joyrides for favourites such as Hamid Nasir Chatta, their brothers- in-law, mothers-in-law, sons, daughters, nephews, nieces and cousins thrice-removed, all of whom are lavishly entertained at our expense in hotels around the world, even at Las Vegas and at the various international Disneylands. Surely her priorities should rather lie in the provisions of Article 38. She herself disregards what is written by the watchdogs of democracy, the men and women of the Press, the Fourth Estate. Her paid hacks, when awake, counter some of the criticism levelled but their words are devoid of credibility. Such rebuttals inevitably involve what they term the greater misdoings of Zia or Nawaz & Co., thereby tacitly admitting their own party's misdoings. Those who try to stem the rot are considered by her and her supporters as 'vipers' and 'spiders' to be shunned. She was removed from office in 1990, on, inter alia, charges of corruption. Some 20 references were filed against her and her family and friends, but they were never seriosly prosecuted by her successors in office (now the opposition), they being more intent upon raking in and augmenting their own pile. Ours is a poor country, where many die for want of proper nourishment and medical care, where the necessities of life such as drinking water and electricity are scarce, and where education barely exists. We have an abundance of law and a complete lack of order. One can go on and on and on listing our woes. The present opposition is ineffective. They seem only to believe in civil disruption, strikes and marches, and in disrupting Assembly proceedings by futile walkouts. They are every bit as bad as those in government. The people are helpless. They are taxed and they receive nothing in return. The country is broke. Our pensioners and widows do not receive their dues. What can be done by the people to stem this waste of our trust funds and resources, to ensure that the money is spent only for their good as dictated by the priorities enshrined in our Constitution. Culpable the Prime Minister would prima facie seem to be. Can our eminent learned lawyers, or even the more sensible among her own advisers, not convince her that in law she actually is? Not that this would cause her to beat her breast and lament, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa", but it might make her stop and think about mending her ways. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950501 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Questionable moves in electronic media sector ------------------------------------------------------------------- By Javed Jabbar A recent report reveals that permission has been given by the "competent authority" in the Federal Government to a particular individual/company/group to operate the first-ever nation-wide cable TV system and 3 FM radio stations without inviting bids from the public. The report underlines the gravity of a situation in which an unhealthy media monopoly by the government itself (PTV, STN, PBC) and by selected favoured parties (NTM and the new beneficiary) is being strengthened and expanded. It is notable that no denial of the report has been issued so far. The air waves of Pakistan have been forcibly taken over by a media mafia that is using electronic media for political propaganda and for personal profiteering. As if this were not bad enough, the latest reported action by the Federal Government violates the Constitution of Pakistan and long- established principles of public interest. To give government-controlled corporations, e.g., PTV, STN, PBC, the permission to operate TV stations/radio stations may be barely tolerable because they are, after all, public sector bodies. But in this new case, an entirely private sector entity of the same status as any other citizen has been specially singled out for an exclusive benefit. Para 8 of the Preamble of the Constitution (The objectives Resolution of 1949) which forms an integral part of the Constitution of Pakistan states, in part: "wherein shall be guaranteed fundamental rights including equality of status, of opportunity and before law...." This guarantee is further reinforced in Article 18 which refers to "freedom of trade, business or profession" and in Article 25 which refers to "the equality of all citizens before law." By denying equality of opportunity to interested citizens to make a bid to win the right to operate TV and radio stations the federal government has deprived them of a basic right guaranteed to them by the Constitution. Whereas citizens are able to apply for permission under the Registration of Printing Presses and Publications Ordinance to publish a newspaper or magazine, no equivalent law exists to enable citizens to apply for permission to operate TV or radio stations (the Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation Act 1973 is specific only for Radio Pakistan. PTV and Shalimar Recording Company Ltd [operator of the STN channel] are joint stock companies like any other corporation with all, or a majority, of their shares owned by government). The only Article in the Constitution which refers to broadcasting and telecasting is Article 159 but this deals only with the relations between the federal and the provincial governments with regard to the construction and operation of transmitters. Here is a vacuum in the law that is distinct and deliberate. This loophole is kept open by those vested interests in the establishment and the federal government which want to preserve the unjust monopoly by the state over TV and radio, and those elements who want to grant permission to their own favourites in the private sector by manipulative methods. The important power to authorise companies or individuals, public or private, to operate TV and radio stations is used on a non- transparent and selective basis purely at the discretion of the government. In the procedural manner of awarding this latest contract, the federal government has also violated various rules of business. The award of a cable TV system and FM radio stations to a particular group without advance public notice amounts to blatant discrimination against the citizens of Pakistan depriving them of: (a) Freedom of speech on TV and radio which is guaranteed to them by Article 19 of the Constitution, but which is denied to them because TV and radio, specially news and current affairs programmes, are rigidly controlled by the Government; and (b) Freedom of opportunity to compete by granting licenses and contracts to the favoured private parties to operate programme contracts on TV and radio without fair and open competition. In October-December 1994, according to a report, Shalimar Recording Company (STN), whose majority shares are controlled by Government of Pakistan, in a secret and dubious manner arbitrarily extended the monopolistic contract for the STN channel to NTM for an additional period of 10 years. Moreover, this was done by improving the terms in favour of NTM in a manner which was not requested by the private party. A constitutional writ petition filed by 14 leading advertising companies challenging the illegal monopolistic contract to NTM is still pending in the Sindh High Court for adjudication after being admitted for hearing in February in 1993. The meeting of the Board of Shalimar which extended the contract reportedly at the behest of a certain individual was held on an irregular basis. Protests by private sector members of the Board against this action were ignored; the impropriety of procedure is a fit case for investigation by the Corporate Law Authority. During the tenure of the caretaker government in August-October 1993, STN was ordered to publicly invite bids to end the unjust monopoly of NTM so that at least 3 contractors could compete and provide programmes to STN for separate sets of days in a week. However, despite a number of attractive bids being received, the monopoly was permitted to continue after the induction of the present Government in October 1993. Pressure and threats were reportedly applied to some of the bidders to withdraw their bids. The latest development exposes an unconstitutional and illegal favour done by the federal government: it also reveals the latest step in a calculated plan to tighten the grip of certain individuals over the electronic media sector of the country. Even the government of the Pakistan Muslim League between 1990 and 1993 did nothing to correct the unjust monopoly created by STN in 1990, in the tenure of the second PPP government. This is one indicator of how devious methods are being used to influence public policy, irrespective of which political party is in office. Though the concept for a new TV channel system was developed during the tenure of this writer as Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting between December 1988 and September 1989, the award of the monopolistic contract was made in 1990 after this writer ceased to be Minister. In 1995, the situation has deteriorated further. There is a definite conspiracy in the electronic media sector of our country which is detrimental to the national interest of Pakistan: it must be fought vigorously by concerned citizens, by newspapers and magazines, by media, by Parliament and by legal means. The federal government should cancel the illegal permission awarded for the cable TV system and FM radio stations as well as the 10 year extension of the NTM contract. A fully transparent, fair and equitable process should be adopted within a new legislative framework for TV and radio approved and continuously monitored by Parliament. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950429 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Friends not foes ------------------------------------------------------------------- AT LONG last, religious parties belonging to various schools of thought have evolved a code of conduct which, they claim, will bring sectarian violence to an end. The parties, which have formed a national solidarity council, met here for two days and discussed all issues threadbare. Apart from the code of conduct, two other important decisions were taken, to observe a complete strike in the country on May 27 to protest against the government's plan to amend the blasphemy laws, and observe May 26 as a day of solidarity with the Islamic countries, especially Iraq, Libya, the Sudan, Iran and the Filipino Muslims who are struggling for independence. This rare show of solidarity by the religious parties is expected to lead to sectarian peace in the country and one hopes that the sorry practice by one sect calling the other a bunch of apostates will come to an end. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950429 ------------------------------------------------------------------- The signals are confusing, but welcome ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From M. Ziauddin ISLAMABAD: The opposition is sending confusing signals. Beginning with a meeting between Nawaz Sharif and Gen Waheed, it has now come to a stage where the PML has launched overt moves to construct a conduit to the Presidency. Already they have silenced their guns against President Leghari and as an expression of the opposition's faith in him, Nawaz has asked the President to intervene and put a stop to what he calls the uncalled-for persecution of the opposition by the ruling party. The opposition has also ended its boycott of official functions which enabled Senator Chaudhry Shujaat to attend the reception the President hosted for formation commanders last week. Nawaz Sharif's meetings with the visiting heads of state and government have started being shown in the main news bulletins on the PTV. Senator Shujaat's cousin, Pervaiz Elahi, acting leader of the opposition in the Punjab Assembly, has already been released on bail. Nawaz's brother Abbas Sharif, MNA, and his nephew Hamza Sharif (Shahbaz's son) held on charges of financial irregularities, are likely to be released on bail soon. Also it now transpires that the PML is having second thoughts about its decision to withdraw from House committees. The possibility of their early return to these committees cannot be ruled out in the House itself, the exchanges during the just concluded session had remained more or less civilised, barring a few incidents here and there, mostly provoked by dimwits on the two sides. The other day I asked the secretary-general of the PML, Sartaj Aziz, for his comments on these developments. Instead of giving a direct reply, the Senator made a short but profound observation on what he termed" Western" democracy. This system, according to him, makes it impossible for the government and the opposition to have anything but a confrontational relationship. Any seeming concord between the two on anything, he maintained, would be regarded as a sell- out and "we would be labelled as loyal opposition." When I pressed further asking him if, as a consequence of these new developments, he expected the government to accede to the ruling of the speaker and bring the incarcerated members of the PML to the House, he said: "If they do that, then we would be in a better position to table a no-confidence motion against the government." But he hastened to add that the opposition would go for the kill only if it had a relatively bigger margin than one or two votes. Another interesting observation which he made during this conversation was that the opposition has now switched its politics >from the streets to the drawing-rooms. He did not elaborate. Sartaj Aziz's mention of noconfidence motion brought to my mind a conversation I had some weeks back with a young PPP MNA from the South. The topic was Rule 90. He gave me the impression that the government had been under great stress from within at the time when it started hitting back at the opposition with cases and arrests in the name of accountability. The pressure mounted on the government by the opposition from the streets during the train march, according to this MNA, had given a handle in the hands of the avaricious on the treasury benches and they had started making unreasonable demands on the leadership thinking that since the Prime Minister was facing an impending no- confidence motion, she would readily grant them their lucrative wishes. It was at about this time, the MNA from South said, that the PM decided to hit her way out of the corner. And the opposition just happened to be in the firing line. This PPP MNA has a very poor opinion of the interior ministry and thought that the FIA was too ill-equipped professionally, as well as morally, to investigate economic crimes. While it is trying to establish seemingly normal links with the Presidency and the GHQ, the opposition appears otherwise determined to keep targeting at the ruling party's weakest spot, its wafer-thin margin in the House. Another one of the ruling party's weaker spots is its perceived queasy relationship with the army. And the opposition has tried to push a wedge into every real and imaginary crevice in this relationship whenever an opportunity came its way or it could contrive one. So far it has not succeeded in its aims. But it is not likely to give up trying. Last week Chaudhry Nisat tried it again by talking fast and loose in the Press gallery of the National Assembly. I remember once PML MNA Ahsan Iqbal telling me at the peak of the opposition's train march that the army and his party were natural allies. The implications were too obvious, and ominous too. The chances are the opposition will continue to use every opportunity to bring the government down, which is their legitimate right. And the government, on the other hand, would use every trick in its bag to ward off the slings of the opposition as best it could and try to complete its term which, rumours have it, is likely to be reduced by one year by the government on its own. Meanwhile, there is nothing wrong if the PML develops a proper relationship with the other two members of the troika, the President and the Chief of the Army Staff (COAS),both of whom by the very nature of their offices have to be politically neutral. The President, especially, has a role to play in keeping the two sides from committing excesses. Establishment of open lines between the opposition and the Presidency and between the opposition and the COAS would serve also to eliminate useless misunderstandings and wasteful debates on non-issues. An unhindered line to the GHQ would in addition serve to curb the temptation to take liberties with security issues and related matters like who should be promoted and who should not; who should be given a two- year extension and who should be sent home immediately; and how early should one announce the name of a retiring chief's successor. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950429 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Carneige endowment report : India can make 80 N-bombs, Pakistan 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From Masood Haider UNITED NATIONS, April 28: Pakistan has the capability to produce as many as 25 nuclear devices within hours or days while India can assemble 80 nuclear devices within the same period. The apparent ability of both South Asian states to deploy short-range nuclear- capable ballistic missiles threatens to trigger an escalating arms race between them, says a Carnegie Endowment study. The study which was unveiled on Thursday at a Press conference at the United Nations in the backdrop of the 178-nation nuclear Non- Proliferation Treaty's extension debate, says: "Pakistan's nuclear weapons are thought to have yields comparable to the device used by the United States on Nagasaki." The study, called "Tracking nuclear proliferation, a guide in maps and charts-1995," says that, according to conservative estimates of India's nuclear weapons programme potential published in India in 1992, it had that time enough plutonium to make 60 nuclear warheads and, in 1995, it was projected to have enough plutonium to produce as many as 80. India, the study says, is also working on two nuclear-capable missiles, the short-range Prithvi, intended for use against Pakistan, and intermediate-range Agni, apparently intended for use against China. Quoting the State Department study made in April of 1994, which was submitted to US Congress, it was projected that Pakistan could assemble "a limited number of nuclear weapons in relatively short timeframe." A portion of Pakistan's potential arsenal apparently consists of a number of complete but unassembled nuclear weapons, which could be readied for use in hours the study says. The remainder of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal, the Carnegie study says, consists of weapons-grade nuclear material, that together could be fashioned into weapons in weeks or possible days. In all, Pakistan might be able to deploy between 15 and 25 nuclear weapons. The Carnegie study says Pakistan, which is not a party to the Nonproliferation Treaty, secretly launched its nuclear programme in 1972, in the aftermath of its defeat in the 1971 war with India. The programme, which accelerated dramatically after India's nuclear test in May 1974, made substantial progress by the early 1980s. A 1983 US State Department analysis of Pakistan's nuclear-weapons effort declared that there was "unambiguous evidence that Pakistan is actively pursuing a weapons development programme." The report highlighted Pakistan's progress in key areas of weapons manufacture, its critical dependence on clandestine efforts to procure nuclear equipment from private Western firms, and nuclear assistance from China, including assistance "in the area of fissile material production and possibly also nuclear device design." The centre piece of the programme is Pakistan's Kahuta enrichment plant, which is not subject to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards, says the study. The Carnegie study says that however, Pakistan's ability to produce weapons-usable nuclear materials will be further enhanced upon completion of a plutonium production reactor now under construction at Khushab. The reactor, which is being built with Chinese assistance, according to US officials, is not subject to IAEA inspection and, when completed, will provide Pakistan with its first source of unsafeguarded plutonium-bearing spent fuel. If plutonium >from that fuel is extracted at the nearby Chashma reprocessing plant or at the pilot-scale plant at Rawalpindi, both of which are thought to be ready to operate, but neither of which is currently subjected to IAEA inspection, Pakistan could obtain plutonium that it would be legally free to use for nuclear arms. (China is also supplying to Pakistan a nulcear power plant, which is under construction at Chashma, which will be placed under IAEA. DELIVERY CAPABILITY: As regards Pakistan's ability to deliver the nuclear devices in case of a war, the study says it possesses a variety of nuclear-capable fighter-bomber aircraft, including the US- supplied F-16s, that could be modified to deliver nuclear weapons in a crisis. There is also a growing evidence that Pakistan has received nulcear-capable, 280-km range M-11 missiles from China, or key components for the system. It had not deployed this system as of early 1995, but apparently could take this step relatively quickly. In August 1993, the study says, the United States imposed sanctions on Pakistan and China. The sanctions against the latter were lifted in October 1994, after China agreed to a ban on the sale of missiles inherently capable of carrying a 500-kg payload to a distance of 300 km or more, a ban which China agreed prohibited further exports of the M-11. In the mid-1980s also, with Chinese assistance, Pakistan launched a programme to develop two short-range nuclear-capable ballistic missiles, the Hatf-I and Hatf-II, with ranges of 80 km and 300 km respectively. US intelligence sources believe that the Hatf-I has probably already been deployed but that the Hatf-II will not be available for a number of years, the study adds. DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS*DWS 950428 ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From Press Gallery : An intelligent opposition move ------------------------------------------------------------------- ISLAMABAD: Opposition Pakistan Muslim League in all fairness deserves credit for its timely move to disapprove, through a resolution, the recently-promulgated Presidential ordinance empowering the special courts to accept the confession of an accused given before a police officer as evidence. The treasury benches were caught off guard when the Speaker told them that the disapproval motion was received by his secretariat a fortnight hack. When Deputy Law Minister Raza Rabbani tabled a heap of ordinances before the House, the acting deputy opposition leader, Hamza, opposed the laying of the first ordinance relating to the special courts. The silver-tongued Raza Rabbani took refuge behind the rules saying that at least three days' notice was required for moving a disapproval motion and that it was purely the Speaker's discretion to allow it Or not. But he must have received a shock of his short parliamentary life when the Speaker told him that the motion was received in his secretariat at least 12 days back. This is also a hint that the government was not enjoying the Speaker's confidence, otherwise the ruling party is normally informed about such resolutions by the Assembly secretariat. Though the opposition was less effective without Iftikhar Gilani at such a crucial time, Yaseen Wattoo pleaded the opposition case in spite of Hamza's presence, who is good at spoiling even a strong argument. Since this was for the first time in Pakistan's parliamentary history that such a motion had been moved, the Speaker patiently heard the two sides hefore giving his decision." I use my discretion in favour of the opposition," Gilani said allowing the disapproval motion which would now be discussed and voted upon during the next session. The ruling party would hopefully also seriously take the advice of the Speaker that the controversial ordinance should be bulldozed. But bills have been bulldozed by the ruling parties in the past with the connivance of the Speaker. The 12th Amendment would not have been passed in 20 minutes had the then speaker, Gohar Ayub, who is now championing the cause of democracy, not colluded with the ruling party. Gohar failed in the test when it was time to prove his democratic credentials and now it's Yousaf Raza Gilani's turn. Hopefully history will not repeat itself. The opposition fear that the ordinance has all the ingredients for being used as a whip against it is not totally unfounded. The police are known for getting confessions through third-degree methods and all the pitfalls must be studied before the government decides to pass this bill. It might have its own reasons to bring this law but it must listen to the opposition's voice instead of making it an issue of its ego. Since this was the last sitting of the present session, the opposition and ruling party members were trying to settle the scores by generously passing remarks and taunting each other. Witty Ghazanfar Gul, whose remarks are mostly ignored by the Speaker, was at his best today. He did not leave any opportunity to target Hamza. When an opposition member pointed out the lack of quorum in the House after most of the opposition members had left the hall, Ghazanfar was quick in saying that Hamza has such a repulsive personality that even opposition members have run away from him after he was imposed on them as their deputy opposition leader. When the Speaker asked Hamza to brief him on the rules for presenting a disapproval motion, it was Ghazanfar again who said: "Mr Speaker, he doesn't know the rules himself, how can he brief you." The move by the opposition members to create a quorum problem did not meet with success. After the passage of an opposition resolution, which had caused embarrassment for the government, the ruling party members can ill-afford to leave the House. PPP's chief whip Khursheed Shah has a tough job to ensure the presence of his party members and though being a minister he prefers to sit on the back benches to keep vigilance. Even Petroleum Minister Saifullah Khan had to mortgage his file to guarantee his return. While Saifullah was about to leave the hall, Khursheed Shah rushed to him and asked him to leave his file with him to ensure his return. Opposition member Ahsan Iqbal, who had a major role in creating a pandemonium in the House on Wednesday, was cautioned by the Speaker not to use provocative language. Every time he would stand up to speak on some issue, the Speaker would ask him to refrain from using provocative language. The privilege motions moved by the MNAs have become a laughing- stock. We have seen breach of privilege motions being moved by the members where someone's driver was not allowed to take a weapon inside the airport car-park, or where the plane was delayed for bad weather or where someone's relatives were not given a VVIP treatment. A similar case was brought up by opposition member Amjad Yaseen who was annoyed over why the PLA failed to provide him a seat on his open ticket. And it was painful to see that he moved the motion knowing well that three other ruling party members who had open tickets were also not accommodated in the same plane. Demanding seat on an open ticket is not a privilege of a member whether it a national airline or a private airline. What should have the airline done, thrown out one of the passengers who had a reserved seat. Those who have elected them and sent them to the assemblies must be given more respect and it is time that the parliamentarians stop being frivolous about their privileges. It appears they need more careful handling than even the glassware. Let them put on sticker on their foreheads reading: "Parliamentarians handle with care." ===================================================================

SPORTS

950504 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Zubair goes down fighting to Jansher Khan ------------------------------------------------------------------- *From A Majid Khan PESHAWAR, May 3: Top Seed Jansher Khan, world champion for the first time conceded 11 points against Zubair Jahan Khan who came close to taking a game before the former moved into the semifinals of the Sixth PSF Federation Cup here this afternoon. Jansher Khan whose quarter final was played at the PAF Squash Complex, had to stay on the court for 33 minutes before recording a 9-0, 9-3, 10-8 win. In his earlier two matches superfit Jansher Khan did not drop a single point in his ruthless eliminations of his rivals. Jansher-Zubair match: Playing with supreme confidence Jansher started the game in a commanding way pocketing the first game at 9-0 in just five minutes as hard hitting Zubair Jehan Khan committed many unforced mistakes. Zubair's drives time and again hit the 19-inch tin of the PAF Squash Complex as he had played his earlier two encounters on courts with 17inch tins. However, Zubair Jahan, former runner-up of the Asian Championship here, took some time to get used to the 19-inch tin. He improved his play in the second game against Jansher who after leading 2-0 trailed 2-3 as Zubair hit two forehand winners. Great Jansher was back in the game in a punishing mood and produced a brace of winners. He took seven points in one hand with Zubair invariably hitting the tin (9- 3). ====================== END DAWN -- 4 MAY 1995 ===================
Dawn Page